- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 118,166
- Reaction score
- 58,469
Yep. I think the Suns should have been on that one. If he had signed that deal here, I would have been happy. Our FO seems to be waiting for something.
I have no other explanation.
Yep. I think the Suns should have been on that one. If he had signed that deal here, I would have been happy. Our FO seems to be waiting for something.
Our FO seems to be waiting for something.
Anthony Randolph.
And acquisitions like Humpheries would show that isn't the case and they serious about winning?Or they're happy with an "entertaining" team that competes for a playoff spot, and don't feel any strong need to try to move beyond that. Or they're just inept.
Or they're happy with an "entertaining" team that competes for a playoff spot, and don't feel any strong need to try to move beyond that. Or they're just inept.
was traded from Bulls to Magic for 2 2nd rounders.
And acquisitions like Humpheries would show that isn't the case and they serious about winning?
was traded from Bulls to Magic for 2 2nd rounders.
And expected to be waived.
Yes. What's the point of cultivating Dragic as a SF, or Marcus Morris as a center? That's not the path to long-term success. Get players that allow the "keepers" on the roster to play at something resembling a natural position.
At this point the Suns have 96 C and PF minutes per game that they need to staff. There's no way they can come close to that without severe small ball. And if the whole point is to start rebuilding the credibility of the franchise, severe small ball is a huge mistake. I'd much rather see an overpaid, mediocre stopgap PF than playing Tucker in that position. And don't even get me started about the farce that is going to be the center rotation this season.
So he IS available.
:championship:
If the Suns sign Boozer, this place will go crazy bonkers with how lame he is.
If the Suns sign Boozer, this place will go crazy bonkers with how lame he is.
That's just stupid.
Is Boozer the best PF available?
Can the Suns get him at a decent price?
Is he better than what they have?
Or they're happy with an "entertaining" team that competes for a playoff spot, and don't feel any strong need to try to move beyond that. Or they're just inept.
He is terrible.
He averaged 14/8 last year in under 30 mins.
Carlos Boozer is really, really bad
He ranks 79th out of 89 PFs in the survey with a -3.79, and I doubt that surprises anyone. What's shocking about this number is that it's made up of a -3.74 on offense and a -.05 on defense.
Now it's probably fair to note that if you are playing defense next to Joakim and Taj, both amongst the best defenders in the NBA then you'll look a bit worse on defense than you really are, but I can't truly believe that Boozer's defense is just a shade below average.
What I can believe is that his offense has been horrible this season. He no longer can score in isolation at all, though truth be told, he was never that good at it for Chicago anyway. He draws no fouls, hits no threes, and shoots mostly fade away jumpers at a pedestrian rate.
When Boozer can't score, he's dead weight on the floor because he sure isn't helping anyone defensively. That said, the Bulls need someone to chew up some minutes, and at least Boozer can do that better than Nazr Mohammed.