Look, I'm not the only one with this point of view. Snoop around NBA sites and you'll see all sorts of chatter about James's leadership failures. That doesn't mean that the chatter is correct, but it seems pretty haughty to dismiss it out of hand as "one of the more ridiculous things ever said."
I don't care what people write on the internet to drive traffic. I think it's beyond ridiculous to say he doesn't make his teammates better and since you just refused to acknowledge literally ANY point made about his previous teams, it's pretty obvious to me that either a) you don't watch many of his games or b) just can't admit that you're wrong.
In addition, getting to the Finals and losing isn't the standard that the greatest players measure themselves by. Jason Kidd's Nets got to two straight Finals, and those teams sucked. A lot of people think that Stockton and Malone's 0-2 Finals record tarnishes their legacies. Imbalance between the conferences can make it a lot easier to get there through one side than through the other.
There's no doubt that it's easier to get to the Finals from the East... but the fact that LeBron, and LeBron alone can seemingly get ANY team he plays on to the Finals has to say at least A LITTLE about his ability to make the players around him better, IMO.
And I don't know what Kidd, Malone and Stockton have to do with anything. Are you in any way shape or form actually comparing them to LeBron and linking his failures to them? Because i'm pretty sure 6 finals appearances (on a lot of BAD teams) and two titles wins have nothing to do with guys who NEVER won a title (except kidd in his twilight).
Since I mentioned Chamberlain specifically, I have to wonder whether you read my post. As for Bird, he was at full strength for only his first 9 seasons, so 3 titles isn't a bad percentage, especially since he was up against legitimate all-time greats in Abdul-Jabbar and Magic.
I read your post... just starting piling on other guys who should fit your bill as players with overwhelming talent that apparently don't make players around them better. As for your caveat with Bird... he had HOF talent surrounding him his entire career. Can you say the same for LeBron? And LeBron didn't have All-Time greats he was going up against, mostly single-handedly? Tim Duncan, Manu, Parker and their cadre of titles AREN'T all-time greats? Come on.
And should we put Hakeem in the category of not making players around him better? I mean, he only won two titles and was overwhelming more talented than any big man in the game. I mean, what a loser that guy was!
Pick you favorite candidates for top-5 all time and ask yourself if they would ever lose to the 2011 Mavericks in a Finals. That's just one glaring example.
it's one glaring example... because it's the exception to the rule. Can you give me other glaring examples?