Suns targeting Ntilikina?
Meh
Right now the Suns <<The sum of their parts. They have some talented pieces but they can’t seem to put it together.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
An indictment of coaching if ever there was one.
If we are going to give Elie a good look lets do it. Ntilikina seems a pretty sideways move to me. So yeah. Meh.Suns targeting Ntilikina?
Meh
We have the worst PG and PF situation in the entire NBA. Sure we have talent, but we have gaping holes in two very important spots.Maybe I’m overvaluing Suns talent but there are some other teams around the league that seem to be winning more with less.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Gambo really choked during the draft. Maybe it's just who he is, and his personality, but he always comes across like he's the smartest guy in the room who knows all sides of everything so when he was repeatedly wrong on draft night it got to him. You could tell by his tone that he was frustrated because he was in the dark but he was doing a live show. I remember him announcing the Suns selected DiVincenzo only for the feed to go to the commissioner who announced Zhaire Smith as the selection. At that point in the night it was a fitting end to his coverage, basically. Woj and Sham had already posted the trade but Gambo was stubborningly trying to figure out what was going on.
I've heard a number of people try to say whose Gambo's source within the Suns is. McD is the only person who has ever been ruled out, I think. Some have said Sarver, some said Dragic, some said Dudley, some have said Mark West, Hornacek, Majerle, Chambers. I've heard a lot of different names. I think Sarver might feed him some stuff but only what he won't come out and say himself. When Gambo is handling that stuff it's really obvious though.
Gambo was reporting that the Suns had a deal in place with the Charlotte to move up to 11 and draft SGA. He even announced it. Then someone in the Suns front office nixed the trade.
Philly picked Mikal but then when the Suns 16 pick came around and Smith was still on the board, Philly called the Suns back (there had been earlier negotiations) and asked if the Suns were still interested in Bridges.
So here is the question. Who negotiated the trade and who nixed it? Who were the Suns going to give up for the #11 pick. This is the time when people will get all over Sarver for meddling. It was Sarver most likely, but we do not know for sure. But the other question is what were they giving up? What was it that Charlotte would have wanted?
Bender? There were a lot of good feelings about Bender at draft time.
Chriss? He was still an asset.
TJ. He would have been a piece most of us would have traded at that time without too much worry.
2019 Suns pick. I could see that pick being in the mix and someone on the Suns wanting to hold it.
Miami pick. Absolutely. Everyone wanted that asset from us.
Milwaukee pick. Maybe, but it would have taken more.
We have the worst PG and PF situation in the entire NBA. Sure we have talent, but we have gaping holes in two very important spots.
Three rookies playing significant minutes in the 8 man rotation.Maybe I’m overvaluing Suns talent but there are some other teams around the league that seem to be winning more with less.
Is the Suns disfunction the result of coaching or ownership?
Or both?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Suns have been terrible for so long. There’s really only one person to blame at this point.
Here’s a question, if Sarver is Gambo’s source, doesn’t logic dictate that this recent news came from Sarver? If you buy that logic, why would he reveal that to Gambo now? It would only make him look worse than he already is.I think, clearly, it was Sarver or it was Jones if it actually went down the way Gambo reported. And honestly, I don't know which one would be worse. Also, as you mentioned, we don't know what the cost would have been for SGA. Perhaps it was overruled because it required our unprotected pick this season or something like that.
Here’s a question, if Sarver is Gambo’s source, doesn’t logic dictate that this recent news came from Sarver? If you buy that logic, why would he reveal that to Gambo now? It would only make him look worse than he already is.
Either Gambo’s story is bull or his source isn’t Sarver.
Agreed, Fultz value is as low as it gets. The situation with PHI is not salvageable as the players are tired of the drama. Ironically, I've seen Fultz for Ball rumors, but if I was PHX maybe Bender and a pick.
Three rookies playing significant minutes in the 8 man rotation.
New coach and system. The coach is focusing on long term over immediate wins.
Extremely difficult strength of schedule so far. Top two I think.
Rotation still being settled, especially at pg.
Josh Jackson is single-handedly killing us with his turnovers. It is the single most impactful stat so far.
We have the worst PG and PF situation in the entire NBA. Sure we have talent, but we have gaping holes in two very important spots.
If we are going to give Elie a good look lets do it. Ntilikina seems a pretty sideways move to me. So yeah. Meh.
Don't worry. Philadelphia has no interest in Jackson.
If a trade happens Ariza will be the centerpiece.
We could offer Bender and the Millwaukee pick - they will just say no, we would rather have Ariza.
I remember 40 some years ago being a young father and how much of a challenge it was to learn how to say no. Hope our front office has learned the same skill. I would offer nothing of real value for Fultz, just absorbing his guaranteed contract is already an overpay. I understand they may insist on more, but just because they were stupid enough to trade up for him doesn't mean we have to pay any kind of premium for damaged goods.
I remember 40 some years ago being a young father and how much of a challenge it was to learn how to say no. Hope our front office has learned the same skill. I would offer nothing of real value for Fultz, just absorbing his guaranteed contract is already an overpay. I understand they may insist on more, but just because they were stupid enough to trade up for him doesn't mean we have to pay any kind of premium for damaged goods.
+1
I'm not sure why people are suggesting we give up role players and picks for him.
I would not trade JJ. JJ is still going to be a good player. I have no doubt of that. I have huge doubts about Fultz.i don't disagree. but if Cavs were offering a protected first round pick (and Philly didn't bite), it appears others are not afraid to absorb his contract guarantee.
the thing that makes the JJ swap doable is that JJ is risky too.
but he has played better the past week. and i don't believe he's had enough playing time in the past month to be blamed for the Suns losses. i think he has good bb iq and bad execution. but execution can improve with experience.
i don't know where Fultz's head is, but it may be up his ass.
i'll bet the Suns are mulling over it.