+1Jackson is WAY more valuable than the Miami pick. Also, we shouldn't be looking to move him.
+1Jackson is WAY more valuable than the Miami pick. Also, we shouldn't be looking to move him.
Why not? Like it or not, at this time he IS our starting PG.And please don't bring up Brandon Knight at pg! He's an unknown variable right now.
Why not? Like it or not, at this time he IS our starting PG.
Boston has Tatum, Brown, Hayward and Marcus Morris and they are doing Ok.I'm thinking people are too caught up in the positional log jam idea. I really don't see a reason why our front court can't be Ayton, Jackson, and Bridges. Seriously, look around the league. Players that were traditionally PF's are now Centers. Does adding Aaron Gordon instead of Bridges make us a better team? Does that make a better frontcourt? I know he's one of the "PF" that people discussed bring in. How about Julius Randle or Jabari Parker? I could see Jackson and Bridges being similar to them without much work needing to be done. Get them to hit the weights and bulk up some, we'll be fine. We're not going to be giving up a lot of size. Ayton is our big, that's fine. We'll have Bender and Chriss to bring in if needed. Warren as the first forward off the bench. It's the new NBA. Bridges has the length to play PF. I'm not nearly as worried as I was last night after looking around the league and reading up on Bridges.
I'm not sure what Knight will be next year but there is nothing wrong with hoping he's a positive player for us. I don't expect and All-Star or anything close to that. If he can score occasionally and pick up more assists than turnovers I'll be happy. He can't be worse than he was, so there's only way we can go.
Boston has Tatum, Brown, Hayward and Marcus Morris and they are doing Ok.
Why not?
He's the same guy only now he has a surgically repaired knee.
No they don't. Hayward didn't play last year. If he's back, and they don't trade someone away, one of those four is out of the rotation (presumably Morris).
You will not see all four of those players at 20+ mpg for the Celtics next season, unless they wind up doing a lot of platooning because of injuries.
Morris primarily played at PF for Boston and Brown at SG. Even with Hayward back, those 4 should all be over 20 minutes a game next year. I can't see that changing much. Tatum will probably be the guy who backs up all 3. Sort of shuffling their lineup with whoever subs out.
If the Suns traded that Miami pick and #16 for SGA, I don't think anyone would be complaining. I know Bridges is a bit redundant but look at Boston, they've been successful without a true PF. I know that's the east but 2 hard nosed and physical SF's like Bridges and Jackson at forward with Ayton at Center is a realistic frontcourt in today's NBA. We'll be outmatched against the Pelicans, if they keep Cousins, but that's about it in the West. The NBA has changed a lot. I trust the pairing of Bridges and Jackson a whole lot more than Jackson and Warren at forward. What team in the West is really that much bigger than the Suns? Bigger and more talented?
That Heat pick was an asset, no doubt, and I don't like giving it up but ultimately for that pick to turn into something good it requires Pat Riley to do his job poorly. I can't see that. The odds of that being a top 10 pick were slim. The main appeal was the possibility that the NBA ditched the 1 and done.
I'm thinking people are too caught up in the positional log jam idea. I really don't see a reason why our front court can't be Ayton, Jackson, and Bridges. Seriously, look around the league. Players that were traditionally PF's are now Centers. Does adding Aaron Gordon instead of Bridges make us a better team? Does that make a better frontcourt? I know he's one of the "PF" that people discussed bring in. How about Julius Randle or Jabari Parker? I could see Jackson and Bridges being similar to them without much work needing to be done. Get them to hit the weights and bulk up some, we'll be fine. We're not going to be giving up a lot of size. Ayton is our big, that's fine. We'll have Bender and Chriss to bring in if needed. Warren as the first forward off the bench. It's the new NBA. Bridges has the length to play PF. I'm not nearly as worried as I was last night after looking around the league and reading up on Bridges.
They also have Horford at PF and Smart at SG. And they did some double-PG sets last season with Irving and Rozier.
http://www.82games.com/1718/1718BOS2.HTM
Hayward's addition will make things very crowded, mainly because of the logjam at SF.
I'm not so sure. They'll likely run A line-up of Irving, Tatum, Hayward, Brown and Hordford with Rozier and Morris being key reserves.
I agree with you Chap, Knight has really been working very hard and looks like a different guy. He is also well liked by his teammates. I would not count him out just yet.Why not? Like it or not, at this time he IS our starting PG.
I agree with you Chap, Knight has really been working very hard and looks like a different guy. He is also well liked by his teammates. I would not count him out just yet.
I'm not so sure. They'll likely run A line-up of Irving, Tatum, Hayward, Brown and Hordford with Rozier and Morris being key reserves.
Is he? I'm not saying you're wrong, I just hadn't noticed any real camaraderie involving Knight and teammates.
He's been working with them a lot since the season's ended. Every time pics have been posted of him working out or discussions about him are happening by informed sources (Bordow and McD, primarily) it seems teammates are involved. I know he was one of the guys mentioned when it was said Ayton was watching the finals game after his Suns workout. Check out his instagram and there are photos of him at the Suns facility with Jackson and Reed. He was also featured in that video where Jackson showed he'd shaved his afro as one of his teammates messing with him. I'll take that as someone who is at least part of the "clique" the team has. Remember that he didn't play with them last year so being around them now shows he's built relationships with them in other ways than sharing court time.
Why not? Like it or not, at this time he IS our starting PG.
But it is what it is. He is our starting PG. You or I may hope he ends up NOT being that, but for now, it's something you have to plan for.He hasn't played in about a year and we've never used him as a pg so excuse me if I'm hesitant. Yeah I'm sure he'll be thrown in there and he might be adequete but coming off an injury he's a unknown right now.
I'm aware of all those but I don't know that they really tell us much. He and his teammates have always seemed distanced during the games and on the sidelines and that goes back to when he was playing, not just his occasional bench appearance last year. I'm not saying they're enemies, I just don't know if there's enough evidence to state that they are all close knit. I hope so but I don't know.