There are 29 other teams trying to sign the same players. You win some, you lose some.
You don't back-load a deal like that unless you know you're going to use the savings.
There are 29 other teams trying to sign the same players. You win some, you lose some.
You don't back-load a deal like that unless you know you're going to use the savings.
Dbacks haven't spent all that Kendrick said they would.
In addition, after this year Tomas comes off the books - that amount is basically the increase in MadBum's salary
My point, though, is that if you're not going to spend the savings this year, don't back-load the MadBum deal, so there are even more savings to use for future payrolls once Tomas's contract comes off the books. Otherwise, extra salary in the future is unnecessarily being spent on MadBum when it could have been spent this year, which means future payroll flexibility unnecessarily wasted.
And in terms of not spending all that Kendrick said they would this year, that is precisely my point. All indications were that the savings from the MadBum deal being back-loaded were going to be used to fill holes at CF/2B and/or in the bullpen. Well, Spring Training is right around the corner, reported D-Backs targets are being gobbled up left and right by other teams, and there isn't so much as a word about the D-Backs doing anything other than signing minor league depth that won't even be on the 40 man roster. Something isn't right here...
Free agency/trades aren't close to being over. Spring Training is more than a month away. Before you start ripping Hazen, let it get to there first.
And yes, sometimes plans get blown up because other teams are willing to over pay, or a play just plain prefers another team.
And in the end, if they wanted to move some of MadBums salary to this year, they still could. No salary cap, so nothing stopping them from doing that
Except a signed contract to which they are legally bound...
And the reason I am raising the point is that Spring Training tickets are about to be on sale, and we have no clue who the starters for the middle of our defense will be...for tge second year in a row (with that uncertainty last year costing us our best hitter for the last month of the season)...
And they can adjust the contract
Dbacks aren't the only team in the same boat. Relax
This is generally the "waiting game" portion of the offseason. Teams are asking high in trades and agents are asking high in contracts. I believe Hazen is just being patient (and smart) waiting for trade/contract values to come down. I can pretty much guarantee that they will still add 5-10 million in contracts onto their payroll this year.
Jon Morosi
@jonmorosi
·
3m
Kevin Pillar is one of the most underrated free agents in @MLB, coming off a season of 161 games (career high), .719 OPS (career high) and 21 HR (tied for career high). He could fit with #Rangers, #Mets or #Dbacks depending on Starling Marte trade outcome.
@MLBNetwork
Jon Morosi
@jonmorosi
·
3m
Kevin Pillar is one of the most underrated free agents in @MLB, coming off a season of 161 games (career high), .719 OPS (career high) and 21 HR (tied for career high). He could fit with #Rangers, #Mets or #Dbacks depending on Starling Marte trade outcome.
@MLBNetwork
And an effective leadoff hitter who finds ways to get on base.OPS of .719 is atrocious for a starting OF. That said, I guess he would be better than the mix and match line-ups. (He certainly is superior to the likes of Locastro, Rojas, Vargas and Leyba.)
Still, why not just bring back Dyson (a better fielder with a better WAR who is familiar with the layout of Chase Field) if we are going to settle for a sub-par hitter at CF?
And an effective leadoff hitter who finds ways to get on base.
Dyson seemed to be a clutch get-on-base guy last season.Well at least more so (.319 career OBP, .313 last year) than Kevin Pillar (.296 career OBP, .287 last year).
Other than keeping Ketel at one position (and no longer having to be the backup SS as well)https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.azcentral.com/amp/4423580002
Looks like Ketel Marte at CF and the poo-poo platter of Vargas/Leyba/Rojas/Young at 2B with Escobar occasionally moving over and Lamb or Vargas playing third.
Ugh...
Other than keeping Ketel at one position (and no longer having to be the backup SS as well)
if Torey would actually do that, the combination you described to cover 2B is hardly the one
to take us to the next level.
I still want to be convinced that Torey can abandon his for or five position player transfers
per game. It has become his trademark. There is a difference between flexibility and chaos.
Well, a GM and his Manager are supposed to be in synch. The problem is when they are both dysfunctional.That kind of combination at 2B is a gigantic step backwards (why not just re-sign Flores) and would actually ENCOURAGE Torey to tinker MORE...
Well, a GM and his Manager are supposed to be in synch. The problem is when they are both dysfunctional.
And down the street we have a situation where we have a good coach and a GM who is pulling the rug out from under him. And in Glendale, we have arguably the best GM in the NHL and a joke of a coach.
What is it with sports management in this city?...