2023 draft trade in hindsight

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,914
Reaction score
45,331
Location
Colorado
The better Paris Johnson plays the less "impact" we see from him.
His primary job is to keep bad things from happening.

dude may have already saved Kyler from 10 separate career ending injuries..we will just never know.
I disagree. The bar is set by Paris Johnson vs league average LTs. Paris might be slightly above league average. Will Anderson is significantly above league average at his position.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,914
Reaction score
45,331
Location
Colorado
And another place I disagree is your statement about a lack of notice. I notice Tret Williams shutting down players. I notice Penei Sewell dominating players. I notice Tristan Wirfs.

I think where you missing is that average OTs don't get noticed. They aren't glaringly good or bad. Good and bad OTs 100% do get noticed.
 
Last edited:

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
19,374
Reaction score
18,203
Location
Modesto, California
And another place I disagree is your statement about a lack of notice. I notice Tret Williams shutting down players. I notice Penei Sewell dominating players. I notice Tristan Wirfs.

I think where you missing is that average OTs don't get noticed. They glaringly good or bad. Good and bad OTs 100% do get noticed.
I notice Paris shutting down players too...and I notice our quarterback not getting blindsided in 1.2 seconds... but the "Impact" of that is tough to measure. Because its hard to place a value on something that doesnt happen.
But there is a reason why 20million dollar contracts hit the LT position before they hit the edge position.

everybody wants "flashy" and seeing a good edge rusher blow past a guy and flatten the QB is exciting and can be game changing. I agree.
But a solid OT that keeps that from happening is more valuable to a team...for the very basic reason that it keeps your quarterback on the field.
 

Rohinaz

All Star
Joined
Oct 14, 2018
Posts
568
Reaction score
675
Location
Scottsdale
I disagree. The bar is set by Paris Johnson vs league average LTs. Paris might be slightly above league average. Will Anderson is significantly above league average at his position.
Will Anderson had a big jump in his 2nd year and so did PJJ moving to LT and playing extremely well. From a position standpoint, Garrett Williams outperformed both. With Ojulari and Robinson healthy (hopefully) this trade could be lopsided in the cards favor by the end of the year.
Not to mention Michael Wilson (Average so far), Dante Stills (great pick) and Elijah Jones (injured)
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,914
Reaction score
45,331
Location
Colorado
I notice Paris shutting down players too...and I notice our quarterback not getting blindsided in 1.2 seconds... but the "Impact" of that is tough to measure. Because its hard to place a value on something that doesnt happen.
But there is a reason why 20million dollar contracts hit the LT position before they hit the edge position.

everybody wants "flashy" and seeing a good edge rusher blow past a guy and flatten the QB is exciting and can be game changing. I agree.
But a solid OT that keeps that from happening is more valuable to a team...for the very basic reason that it keeps your quarterback on the field.
Paris allowed 4 sacks and 7 penalties in 2024. Neither of those are dominant stats.

And agree, a solid OT does have value, but it is still only a solid player.

Preferring a C+ OT to a B+ EDGE rusher is just something I don't agree with.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,646
Reaction score
2,894
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
I disagree. The bar is set by Paris Johnson vs league average LTs. Paris might be slightly above league average. Will Anderson is significantly above league average at his position.
Not according to metrics.

Just because PJJ is more balanced in his play doesn’t mean he is a worse player. PJJ is just below the best as an overall OT.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,914
Reaction score
45,331
Location
Colorado
Not according to metrics.

Just because PJJ is more balanced in his play doesn’t mean he is a worse player. PJJ is just below the best as an overall OT.
Based on what? Penalties? No. Sacks allowed? No. Cardinals 7-7 with him. 1-2 without.

If you are saying film analysis by people who don’t know the blocking assignments of each play is “metrics”, it’s not.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,646
Reaction score
2,894
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
Based on what? Penalties? No. Sacks allowed? No. Cardinals 7-7 with him. 1-2 without.

If you are saying film analysis by people who don’t know the blocking assignments of each play is “metrics”, it’s not.
How about the fact that he is good in the run game too?

Tunsil would be a top 3 OT if only using your comp. Too bad that he’s a liability in the run game.

Love the fact that you have zero metrics to present yourself, yet attack metrics that counter your opinion

Æ
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,914
Reaction score
45,331
Location
Colorado
How about the fact that he is good in the run game too?

Tunsil would be a top 3 OT if only using your comp. Too bad that he’s a liability in the run game.

Love the fact that you have zero metrics to present yourself, yet attack metrics that counter your opinion

Æ
I said Paris is a slightly above average LT. The argument that he is better than that is on the person claiming he is better than that. He wouldn’t be slightly above average if I wasn’t taking into his run blocking into account. His penalties and sacks allowed are below league average.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,646
Reaction score
2,894
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
I said Paris is a slightly above average LT. The argument that he is better than that is on the person claiming he is better than that. He wouldn’t be slightly above average if I wasn’t taking into his run blocking into account. His penalties and sacks allowed are below league average.
And you have have every right to have your opinion.

But he still ranks #11 out of 64. That’s top 20%
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,646
Reaction score
2,894
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
That

would be a B- to a B. He rated him a C+. Seems like y’all are quibbling.
Actually not. Because it’s quite important. The whole premise for this discussion is Anderson vs. PJJ.
Both are buttom of the top 20% at a top 3 position.

Anderson is #9 at Edge and PJJ is #11 at OT. Chopper is arguing that there is a huge difference between the two.

I do not agree and I have metrics to support it. He doesn’t
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
65,608
Reaction score
61,359
Location
SoCal
Actually not. Because it’s quite important. The whole premise for this discussion is Anderson vs. PJJ.
Both are buttom of the top 20% at a top 3 position.

Anderson is #9 at Edge and PJJ is #11 at OT. Chopper is arguing that there is a huge difference between the two.

I do not agree and I have metrics to support it. He doesn’t
Actually that gives Anderson a B to B+ compared to PJJ’s B- to B. It’s essentially the difference of a full + or - using traditional U.S. grading system. Of course I don’t know what ranking you’re using to arrive on #9 and #11, so it all may be a moot point if those rankings are unreliable or inaccurate.

I was more referencing y’all arguing over how to identify PJJ’s value. B- or C+ is a bit of quibbling.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
624,230
Posts
5,572,770
Members
6,353
Latest member
AZPurdue
Top