What is "define sneaky athleticism "He sounds white.
What is "define sneaky athleticism "He sounds white.
The more I watch from Chop the more I like. With his performance at the combine I’ll be interested to see if he even lasts to 27. In the highlight videos #51(Hakeem Beamon DT 6’3” 290 lb) was around the ball quite a bit as well. Wouldn’t mind him as an UDFA or late round flier.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Minnesota must be trying to trade up to 4 or 5. They have to jump the Giants for MacCarthy. I might do it for 11, 23, and next year's one.Weird trade. I don't recall a team trading out of the first so another team could have 2 firsts.
I wonder if Vikings are looking to package them to move up for a QB?
Chargers trade likely.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
No way. We desperately need a top WR so we’re stuck at 4 at this point.Minnesota must be trying to trade up to 4 or 5. They have to jump the Giants for MacCarthy. I might do it for 11, 23, and next year's one.
#haulWeird trade. I don't recall a team trading out of the first so another team could have 2 firsts.
I wonder if Vikings are looking to package them to move up for a QB?
Chargers trade likely but would you miss out on MHJ to have 11, 23 and 27 in round 1?
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Chargers are trading back. Vikings need a QB. Just getting the ammo ready so they can move on draft day.Weird trade. I don't recall a team trading out of the first so another team could have 2 firsts.
I wonder if Vikings are looking to package them to move up for a QB?
Chargers trade likely but would you miss out on MHJ to have 11, 23 and 27 in round 1?
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Weird trade. I don't recall a team trading out of the first so another team could have 2 firsts.
I wonder if Vikings are looking to package them to move up for a QB?
Chargers trade likely but would you miss out on MHJ to have 11, 23 and 27 in round 1?
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
For me for the Cardinals to trade back to #11 overall it would take:
Cardinals: #4, #138
Vikings: #11, #23, & 2025 2nd
If that trade happens then I use my third (#66) to try and move up from #11 to #7 and take Odunze or Nabers.
This is gross if you look at the board when considering AZ trading back.
5 - Chargers - Likely to take a WR
6 - Giants - If no QB, likely to take a WR
7 - Titans - projected for an OT. Feels like Ridley takes them out of the WR convo.
8 - Falcons - Not likely to take a WR
9 - Bears - Not in the market for a WR
10 - Jets - Not in the market for a WR
there is a Monti galaxy-brain world where he feels he can move back and get one of the top 3 WRs.
For me for the Cardinals to trade back to #11 overall it would take:
Cardinals: #4, #138
Vikings: #11, #23, & 2025 2nd
If that trade happens then I use my third (#66) to try and move up from #11 to #7 and take Odunze or Nabers.
So in summaryFor me for the Cardinals to trade back to #11 overall it would take:
Cardinals: #4, #138
Vikings: #11, #23, & 2025 2nd
If that trade happens then I use my third (#66) to try and move up from #11 to #7 and take Odunze or Nabers.
This is gross if you look at the board when considering AZ trading back.
5 - Chargers - Likely to take a WR
6 - Giants - If no QB, likely to take a WR
7 - Titans - projected for an OT. Feels like Ridley takes them out of the WR convo.
8 - Falcons - Not likely to take a WR
9 - Bears - Not in the market for a WR
10 - Jets - Not in the market for a WR
there is a Monti galaxy-brain world where he feels he can move back and get one of the top 3 WRs.
Since the Giants need a QB, we can go back to #6 and still (probably) get one of the Top Three WR's.No way. We desperately need a top WR so we’re stuck at 4 at this point.
Yeah at this point, considering we have no credible 1 or 2 at WR, I think you have to stay at 4 and take Marv, who appears to be the closest thing to a sure thing at the position. If we had another credible #2 I'd be more inclined to take a chance on Odzune.Since the Giants need a QB, we can go back to #6 and still (probably) get one of the Top Three WR's.
For me for the Cardinals to trade back to #11 overall it would take:
Cardinals: #4, #138
Vikings: #11, #23, & 2025 2nd
If that trade happens then I use my third (#66) to try and move up from #11 to #7 and take Odunze or Nabers.
This is gross if you look at the board when considering AZ trading back.
5 - Chargers - Likely to take a WR
6 - Giants - If no QB, likely to take a WR
7 - Titans - projected for an OT. Feels like Ridley takes them out of the WR convo.
8 - Falcons - Not likely to take a WR
9 - Bears - Not in the market for a WR
10 - Jets - Not in the market for a WR
there is a Monti galaxy-brain world where he feels he can move back and get one of the top 3 WRs.
Running through mock scenarios very much shows that you have a chance of missing out on a receiver.This is gross if you look at the board when considering AZ trading back.
5 - Chargers - Likely to take a WR
6 - Giants - If no QB, likely to take a WR
7 - Titans - projected for an OT. Feels like Ridley takes them out of the WR convo.
8 - Falcons - Not likely to take a WR
9 - Bears - Not in the market for a WR
10 - Jets - Not in the market for a WR
there is a Monti galaxy-brain world where he feels he can move back and get one of the top 3 WRs.
As Whis would say...kids got moxie.Breath Fresh Air
What he lacks in talent makes it up in heart
it makes sense, butThe rumor on Twitter is it's actually the Pats the Vikings are working with and they trade up to #3 for Maye.
Makes some sense for the Patsies.The rumor on Twitter is it's actually the Pats the Vikings are working with and they trade up to #3 for Maye.