2024 Free Agency thread

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
8,888
Reaction score
4,816
Location
Iowa
Fulfills our Tongan requirements post Leki Fotu. Another young stud to build up the underbelly of the team! Presumably better than Roy Lopez?
If he actually makes a tackle in a regular season game he's an upgrade on Fotu without costing a 4th round draft pick.
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
8,888
Reaction score
4,816
Location
Iowa

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,535
Reaction score
14,716
@PACardsFan You didn't explain anything at all, just shared a chart from someone without any content.

I said:

"Another hole to fill - so far on offense we have a lateral move at OT and a downgrade at WR. People are giving this offseason B's and A's, and so far we've lost our best WR while adding a handful of questionable NFL starters.

I don't get it."

What did I say that you disagree with, or can you add something other than some arbitrary chart to the conversation?
 

daves

Keepin' it real!
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2003
Posts
3,526
Reaction score
7,207
Location
Orange County, CA
Vikings are moving up into the top 3 for a QB. No way Kwesi does this without a deal in place to move up.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Interesting - this seemed like light compensation for the Vikings to get from 42 all the way to 23, but it almost exactly matches the Draftek trade value chart: #23 + #232 = 760 + 1 = 761; #42 + #188 + 2025 2nd = 480 + 16.2 + 270 = 766.2. (My understanding is that teams consider a pick next year as having the value of the last pick in the round.)
If you're Monti do you take #11 & #23 + one more later pick, to give up #4 to the Vikings?
I know teams can extract a premium for a trade-up for a QB, but #11 + #23 = 1250 + 760 = 2010; #4 = 1800. So getting more than #11 + #23 for #4 seems unlikely.
I want next year's one and 11 and 23. Even then I'd rather get a couple twos from NYG to move to 6.
2025 1st + #11 + #23 = 590 + 1250 + 760 = 2600. I get that you really want Harrison Jr at #4, but it's utterly unrealistic to get that much in return for #4 (1800).
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,248
Reaction score
12,206
Location
York, PA
@PACardsFan You didn't explain anything at all, just shared a chart from someone without any content.

I said:

"Another hole to fill - so far on offense we have a lateral move at OT and a downgrade at WR. People are giving this offseason B's and A's, and so far we've lost our best WR while adding a handful of questionable NFL starters.

I don't get it."

What did I say that you disagree with, or can you add something other than some arbitrary chart to the conversation?
This isn’t difficult to understand. You’ve gone out of your way to be critical of the Cardinal free agents. Obviously there are people out there, including myself, that disagree with your take.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,389
Reaction score
29,775
Location
Gilbert, AZ
@PACardsFan You didn't explain anything at all, just shared a chart from someone without any content.

I said:

"Another hole to fill - so far on offense we have a lateral move at OT and a downgrade at WR. People are giving this offseason B's and A's, and so far we've lost our best WR while adding a handful of questionable NFL starters.

I don't get it."

What did I say that you disagree with, or can you add something other than some arbitrary chart to the conversation?
Bruh FRANK SCHWAB.

'Nuff Said.

IYKYK
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,601
Location
Generational
Interesting - this seemed like light compensation for the Vikings to get from 42 all the way to 23, but it almost exactly matches the Draftek trade value chart: #23 + #232 = 760 + 1 = 761; #42 + #188 + 2025 2nd = 480 + 16.2 + 270 = 766.2. (My understanding is that teams consider a pick next year as having the value of the last pick in the round.)

I know teams can extract a premium for a trade-up for a QB, but #11 + #23 = 1250 + 760 = 2010; #4 = 1800. So getting more than #11 + #23 for #4 seems unlikely.

2025 1st + #11 + #23 = 590 + 1250 + 760 = 2600. I get that you really want Harrison Jr at #4, but it's utterly unrealistic to get that much in return for #4 (1800).
You must be registered for see images attach
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,535
Reaction score
14,716
If he actually makes a tackle in a regular season game he's an upgrade on Fotu without costing a 4th round draft pick.
Leki had 15 tackles and 2.5 sacks last year - Tonga had 9 and 0. When your bar is "better than Leki", you need to have higher standards.
This isn’t difficult to understand. You’ve gone out of your way to be critical of the Cardinal free agents. Obviously there are people out there, including myself, that disagree with your take.
Saying they are questionable starters and mediocre at best IS NOT CRITICAL. By any standard, that is who we've acquired. Which of the players we've acquired would you say don't fit in that category? I'm genuinely curious.

You're free to disagree, but at least disagree with some content or reason vs. a thumbs down.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,355
Reaction score
68,426
This isn’t difficult to understand. You’ve gone out of your way to be critical of the Cardinal free agents. Obviously there are people out there, including myself, that disagree with your take.
He understands you disagree with him. He’s asking WHY you disagree.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
20,767
Reaction score
14,683
Location
Chandler, Az
Chart that shows the few remaining FAs:

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Redsz

We do this together
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Posts
4,874
Reaction score
2,392
Well the Viking just traded up to #23 can’t see them making another trade
It is being suggested that they will package 11+23+something else to move up into the top 3.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
553,547
Posts
5,407,922
Members
6,317
Latest member
Denmark
Top