Warner yelling at a coach is wrong. Haley should have benched that no good for nothing son of a buck for a........ LOL
DCR I am not so sure its just Warner, the playcalling yesterday was strange all day long. I mean why are we not throwing the ball and trying to get up early like we did last week? Then after you get a lead start running the ball not the other way around. The decision not to go for it was so wrong I couldn't believe the punt team was coming out then I was thinking fake punt....nope just giving the game away without trying made me sick. Maybe the single worst decision I have seen from Whiz since he has been here. If we score the momentum would have been in our favor, we have to give ourselves a chance to win not just kick it away with 2:40 or whatever on the clock.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/21/AR2008092101815_pf.html
This may help explain alot about our passing game against Washingtion.
They are going to see much more of this (teams playing 2 or 3 deep) in the coming weeks. They need a good playaction game to counter 3 deep safeties.
Intermediate slants wouldn't hurt either.
Well DCR I would totally disagree with that last statement. Leinart I think will be good but he does not have the skillset and smarts that KW has at this point, no way does he give us just as good of a shot! They keyed on the recievers and kept them in check but come on we could have ran the ball that last series but no they call 2 pass plays on 2nd and 3rd down and throw to friggin Hightower instead of Fitz or Boldin slants or something, just bad playcalling yesterday in many cases.
Do we have any linemen that can get out on a screen play?
What ever happened to the Wide Out screen?
And wouldn't Boldin be the perfect WR to run that play with?
DCR even if they were checkdowns thats what I am saying the play calling there as well in other parts of the game was whacked, did not make sense, sucked! I mean what the hell are you doing there if not at least get a first down the game was almost over you have to at least get first downs, throw a friggin slant or run Edge or HT on the 2nd or 3rd and short I mean make it shorter, if it was 4th down and a half a yard or a yard that decision changes right?
Not everyone here is results oriented. Even if we had gotten the ball back, it was a bad decision to punt. It's just that most would have forgotten about it if got the ball back. Just because there wouldn't have been an 89 post thread about it doesn't mean it would have been a good decision.It didn't work (we didn't get the ball back) so it was a lousy decision.
If we had gotten the ball back and scored, it would have been a brilliant decision.
That's show biz.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/21/AR2008092101815_pf.html
This may help explain alot about our passing game against Washingtion.
They are going to see much more of this (teams playing 2 or 3 deep) in the coming weeks. They need a good playaction game to counter 3 deep safeties.
All that is understood. No one here is saying that going for it would have meant an automatic win for us. Heck, even if we scored a TD and kicked the XP, we would still have to win in OT.even if we had gone for it on 4th down, (which I believed we should have) , keep in mind,
1. There is no guarantee we would have made it.
2. Even if we made it we still had 50 yards to go. Making that 4th down doesn't guarantee anything would have changed.
All that is understood. No one here is saying that going for it would have meant an automatic win for us. Heck, even if we scored a TD and kicked the XP, we would still have to win in OT.
What people here are saying is that, from a pure expected win perspective, there is a better chance of winning 4th and 4 from our 48 with 2:38 left than there is 1st and 10 from our 40 with 1:38 left.
You're preaching to the choir. From the moment Warner started trotting off the field, I jumped up and said," What the hell are we doing?".
Whiz has done a very credible job since he came here. To think he will never make a mistake is unreal and unfair. I'm trying hard to understand his decision. I understand his logic, but I ( most of us) simply don't agree with it. However, I'm not going to throw him under the bus.
How does this help his position? It completely undermines his decision to punt.I had a hard time even understanding his logic. I just listenened to the Monday Presser, and he said that "It would have been impossible to score if we are on inside our 20 yard line and had to go the length of the field without a timeout and less than 2 minutes to play." (paraphrasing)