5/31/2005 Insider - Fry's stock soaring, Taft's falling

sunsfn

Registered User
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Posts
4,522
Reaction score
0
Updated: May 31, 2005
Frye's stock soaring; Taft's falling


By Chad Ford



We really should take more time mocking mock drafts.

At this stage of the game, mocks are little more than educated guesses – strategic placement based on whispers, innuendo and a whole lot of rock, paper, scissors.

NBA teams are fickle. The guy a general manager can't live without one day is kicked to the curb the next.

Draft stock rises and falls like the volatile NASDAQ. One day you're shopping for an Escalade. The next you're cruising around in a Ford Focus.

Remember, last year at this time we had Josh Smith in the lottery and Rafael Araujo panhandling for change in the late first round (on second thought, that's where both of them should have stayed).

Our mock draft drew a lot of response from NBA GMs and scouts over the past week. Based on the volume of feedback, here's whose stock is rising and whose is falling heading into the Chicago pre-draft camp.



STOCK RISING

• While most mock drafts, Insider excluded, have Andrew Bogut going No. 1, it still appears that Marvin Williams is not only in the running, but might have the edge. The Bucks plan to bring in both players after the Chicago pre-draft camp and work them out. The results of the workouts probably will be the deciding factor for the Bucks. If Bogut looks stronger or more athletic than he did in college, he'll probably be a lock for the No. 1 pick. However, if Williams looks like he's ready to contribute right now, he'd be tough to pass on, especially when GM Larry Harris would then have the luxury of shopping Desmond Mason around the league.

The latest sign the Bucks may give Williams the nod comes from former Ute coach Rick Majerus, who reportedly is telling his close friend, owner Herb Kohl, that he's better off taking Williams. Considering how well Majerus knows Bogut (he recruited him to Utah), that should raise a few eyebrows.



• Insider readers sent a flurry of e-mails after we raised Channing Frye from a late first-round pick to a lottery pick in our first mock draft. How could a guy rise so fast – especially a college senior who should be a known product?

We still have the same questions, but sources in Golden State, Orlando and New Jersey told Insider that they'd have a hard time passing him up if he was on the board. The Warriors, especially, are looking for a long, athletic, shot-blocking center who is ready to step up and contribute right now.

I don't believe the Warriors have made him a promise, as some have suggested, but unless someone else comes in and knocks their socks off, I think Frye will be their guy.



• We have Texas A&M guard Antoine Wright going to the Bobcats at No. 13, but he might not be around that long. Sources claim the Clippers are in love with Wright and told him that they'd take him at No. 12 if he shut down his workouts. Wright's agent declined, hoping that if he impressed the Clips at 12, he might rise even higher.

Wright has looked very solid in individual workouts. His body has gotten stronger and he's proving to teams that his improved jumper is for real. The team is also high on Martynas Andriuskevicius, but it sounds like Andriuskevicius is likely to withdraw from the draft again this year.



• We wrote last week that we probably had Tiago Splitter way too low at No. 24. That was the general consensus among NBA scouts and GMs this week. Almost all of them had him slotted late in the lottery, going either to the Knicks at No. 8, the Lakers at No. 10, the Nets at No. 15 or the Raptors at No. 16.

The one big issue for Splitter, however, is his buyout. He still doesn't have a set amount, which is a major problem for teams drafting in the lottery. If his agents can't work out a deal with Tau Vitoria (the club is reluctant to let Splitter go because chances are it's losing big man Luis Scola to the Spurs this summer), there's a chance he may not be able to come to the NBA next season. That will scare off teams that think that the big Brazilian could come in and contribute right away.

• Two months ago we had Julius Hodge on the first-round bubble. We put him at No. 28 in our first mock draft, but chances are he's not going to be around when the Spurs pick.

The feedback we're getting from teams that have worked him out is extremely positive. He could now go as high as No. 17 to the Pacers. The Grizzlies will take a long look at him at No. 19. So will the Rockets at No. 24 and the Jazz at No. 27. Given the high praise he's gotten from all of those teams, it's tough to see him slipping past all four to San Antonio. Just to bolster that contention, Hodge withdrew from the Chicago pre-draft camp. That's always a pretty solid sign that a player's gotten word from a team that it will select him in the first round if he is still on the board.



• Our new first-round sleepers are Providence's Ryan Gomes and Louisville's Francisco Garcia. Both players have been playing to rave reviews at workouts over the past few weeks. Gomes has lost about 15 pounds and is showing teams he has enough of a perimeter game to make the transition to the three. A few teams have compared him to a bigger Corliss Williamson.

Garcia also has worked out great. He's shown a little more athleticism than scouts thought he had, and he's been shooting the lights out in workouts. We're probably going to have to find first-round spots for both of these guys in our next mock draft.



• We also had a few folks who were shocked that Croatian point guard Roko Ukic didn't make the cut. Several GMs and scouts made a recent trip to Croatia to watch him play and came back convinced Ukic might be the fourth-best point guard prospect on the board behind Chris Paul, Deron Williams and Raymond Felton.

That's right, they had him ahead of Jarrett Jack and as a possible mid-to-late first-round pick. We'll see him in Italy in two weeks at the Reebok Eurocamp and give you a full report.

The other international sleeper to watch is Italian forward Angelo Gigli. He's already in the U.S. working out, with sources saying the Sonics are giving him serious consideration at No. 25.






STOCK DROPPING

• How far could Chris Taft drop if he isn't selected by the Knicks at No. 8? He didn't impress Knicks exec Isiah Thomas in his first informal workout and there's word the Knicks may be looking at Frye at No. 8 instead. If the Knicks pass on Taft, the Warriors might consider him at No. 9 and the Lakers could bite at No. 10. But if he gets by those three teams, he could be in a free fall. The Magic, Clippers, Bobcats and Timberwolves don't need or want him. The Nets could use him, but sources say that the Nets don't like him. The next team on the board that actually has a need for a guy like Taft is the Kings at No. 23.



• We still don't know where to put Hakim Warrick. Two weeks ago, we wrote his stock appeared to be on the rise, based on the comments of a couple of GMs who claimed he was being seriously considered in the lottery.

We still think there's a chance the Knicks could tab him at No. 8 and the Warriors at No. 9. However, a number of other scouts and GMs claim they have Warrick ranked in the 20s on their boards. I have a feeling we're going to go back and forth on him all month.



• This could end up being a tough year for international players fishing for first-round promises. Andriuskevicius, who many feel has the most upside of any international player in the draft, took a huge hit when the two teams most interested in him, Milwaukee and Portland, moved up into the top three. The Clippers like him, but it isn't a guarantee that they'll take him. He may have to withdraw.

The same goes for Nemanja Aleksandrov, Yaroslav Korolev, Peja Samardziski, Mile Ilic and, possibly, Marko Tomas and Splitter. All have yet to find teams willing to commit to them in the range they want to go in the first round. It's still early, but so far the prospects aren't looking great




---
 

Kolo

Registered User
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Posts
3,820
Reaction score
0
STOCK DROPPING

• How far could Chris Taft drop if he isn't selected by the Knicks at No. 8? He didn't impress Knicks exec Isiah Thomas in his first informal workout and there's word the Knicks may be looking at Frye at No. 8 instead. If the Knicks pass on Taft, the Warriors might consider him at No. 9 and the Lakers could bite at No. 10. But if he gets by those three teams, he could be in a free fall. The Magic, Clippers, Bobcats and Timberwolves don't need or want him. The Nets could use him, but sources say that the Nets don't like him. The next team on the board that actually has a need for a guy like Taft is the Kings at No. 23.
_____________

If Taft is there at 21, I would think the Suns will take him unless he's got some serious character issues that aren't widely known.
 

Biclops

Superhero with glasses
Joined
Jun 10, 2004
Posts
232
Reaction score
0
Kolobotomy said:
STOCK DROPPING

• How far could Chris Taft drop if he isn't selected by the Knicks at No. 8? He didn't impress Knicks exec Isiah Thomas in his first informal workout and there's word the Knicks may be looking at Frye at No. 8 instead. If the Knicks pass on Taft, the Warriors might consider him at No. 9 and the Lakers could bite at No. 10. But if he gets by those three teams, he could be in a free fall. The Magic, Clippers, Bobcats and Timberwolves don't need or want him. The Nets could use him, but sources say that the Nets don't like him. The next team on the board that actually has a need for a guy like Taft is the Kings at No. 23.
_____________

If Taft is there at 21, I would think the Suns will take him unless he's got some serious character issues that aren't widely known.

Interesting... could be this year's Jameer Nelson
 

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
It would be hard to pass on Taft at 21. All the knocks on him are based on attitude. Physically, he's an early lottery pick.

A guy with a bad attitude on a losing team is deadly. On a team like the Suns, he either works like heck or disappears. Getting pulverized by Amare every day would either make him great or kill him. :rolleyes:
 
OP
OP
S

sunsfn

Registered User
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Posts
4,522
Reaction score
0
Kolobotomy said:
STOCK DROPPING
If Taft is there at 21, I would think the Suns will take him unless he's got some serious character issues that aren't widely known.

The problem is that the suns will not draft anyone they do not try out. If we do not read that he came here for a tryout, I do not look for the suns to take him even if he drops.

A few years ago this happened with Wallace, and it turned out he was never more than a decent player. He did play for the suns for one year later on.
(first name??)
 

Kolo

Registered User
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Posts
3,820
Reaction score
0
sunsfn said:
The problem is that the suns will not draft anyone they do not try out. If we do not read that he came here for a tryout, I do not look for the suns to take him even if he drops.

A few years ago this happened with Wallace, and it turned out he was never more than a decent player. He did play for the suns for one year later on.
(first name??)

John Wallace, who had a great NCAA Tournament for Syracuse. I remember watching the draft, and I was ticked when we picked Nash at 16 (I think) instead of Wallace.
 

cepstrum

Shqiptar i Qart
Joined
Jun 20, 2004
Posts
609
Reaction score
0
Location
Tempe
George O'Brien said:
It would be hard to pass on Taft at 21. All the knocks on him are based on attitude. Physically, he's an early lottery pick.

A guy with a bad attitude on a losing team is deadly. On a team like the Suns, he either works like heck or disappears. Getting pulverized by Amare every day would either make him great or kill him. :rolleyes:

Another guy that fits the same description of Villeneouva. The guy has awsome skills, he's just kind of a headcase and he looks like an alien. I think his skills would fit in well with the suns. He's like a Zarko type player. 6-11 and a creator offensively.
 

Kolo

Registered User
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Posts
3,820
Reaction score
0
cepstrum said:
Another guy that fits the same description of Villeneouva. The guy has awsome skills, he's just kind of a headcase and he looks like an alien. I think his skills would fit in well with the suns. He's like a Zarko type player. 6-11 and a creator offensively.

He has that genetic disorder where no hair grows on his body (I forget what it's called). Maybe that's why he wears a t-shirt under his jersey.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,047
Reaction score
70,109
I don't get the love fest with Viilaneuva at all - that guy showed me NOTHING in college and I NEVER saw the "superior" athleticism he supposedly had either.
 

coloradosun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2004
Posts
1,393
Reaction score
0
Taft, Villaneuava, Warrick all suffer from ESPN hype, Dick Vitale syndrome.
 

PhxGametime

Formerly Bball_31
Joined
Jul 27, 2002
Posts
2,010
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
coloradosun said:
Taft, Villaneuava, Warrick all suffer from ESPN hype, Dick Vitale syndrome.


I still like Hakim Warrick, Shawn Marion was getting rated in the 20's Draft time and was around the #16 area by NBADraft.net pretty late, if not around their final Mock Draft.

Villanueva will probably slide some, with character problems and he's not a great talent, at least yet anyways. Chris Taft IMO won't last to Suns but he could be a little overrated but the guy is 6'11 and IMO he at least has potential.

Warrick is the best athlete out of the 3 and has proven himself the most (20 PTS, 8 REB, etc.) - outside of being thin, and the jumpshot currently; he has the talent to help now...
 

coloradosun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2004
Posts
1,393
Reaction score
0
I just think some of the big names in the Big East get overvalued. Carmelo in particular comes to mind, I bet the Nuggets had Dwayne Wade right now. After taking Nene and Skita in the prior year, Wade would have made more sense, and especially after his performances in the playoffs last year and this. I just see Villanueva, Warrick and Taft falling into the same mold. Boone will be the same type of product next year.

Okafor and Ray Allen are the exceptions from the Big East and the thing that differentiates them is their character. Rudy Gay could be the next big name from the conference that could follow Okafor and Allen.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
With Frye's stock rising, Diogu might be falling. I wouldn't mind picking up Ike or Frye in the first round. Ike not only could spell Amare, he could play the pf along with Amare and move Shawn to SF and Q to the bench.

In the end, I'm not sure if we will have ANY rookies on our team next year. My guess is that the pick will be traded for a quality veteran bench player. A player like a Robert Horry (like him, not him per se) would be a great addition to this team.
 

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,501
Reaction score
964
Location
Gilbert, AZ
JCSunsfan said:
With Frye's stock rising, Diogu might be falling. I wouldn't mind picking up Ike or Frye in the first round. Ike not only could spell Amare, he could play the pf along with Amare and move Shawn to SF and Q to the bench.

In the end, I'm not sure if we will have ANY rookies on our team next year. My guess is that the pick will be traded for a quality veteran bench player. A player like a Robert Horry (like him, not him per se) would be a great addition to this team.

it really depends on who is available. If the Phoenix Suns see someone who can contribute immediately or someone with immense potential I'm sure they will take them and keep them. The nice thing about a rookie is that they are on the rookie pay scale for 4 years.

Joe
 

asudevil83

Registered User
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Posts
2,061
Reaction score
1
BbaLL_31 said:
I still like Hakim Warrick, Shawn Marion was getting rated in the 20's Draft time and was around the #16 area by NBADraft.net pretty late, if not around their final Mock Draft.

Villanueva will probably slide some, with character problems and he's not a great talent, at least yet anyways. Chris Taft IMO won't last to Suns but he could be a little overrated but the guy is 6'11 and IMO he at least has potential.

Warrick is the best athlete out of the 3 and has proven himself the most (20 PTS, 8 REB, etc.) - outside of being thin, and the jumpshot currently; he has the talent to help now...

i was a little high on warrick....he an amazing athlete.....but thats about it. he has ABSOLUTELY NO SHOT. and he's a little small to be a post up guy, unless he's Barkley'esque. i see him as more of a putback guy, and that's it. he might be nice on the rebounding end also.

i'd like to see the suns grab Memphis's first rounder for our 2007 or even some cash. then we'd have the ability to take more of a chance on one of these guys.
 

coloradosun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2004
Posts
1,393
Reaction score
0
My comparisons

Hakim Warrick=Darius Miles
Villanueava=Gadzuric
Taft=Traylor

I believe Miles, Gadzuric and Traylor were 1st round picks as well.
 

Kolo

Registered User
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Posts
3,820
Reaction score
0
coloradosun said:
My comparisons

Hakim Warrick=Darius Miles
Villanueava=Gadzuric
Taft=Traylor

I believe Miles, Gadzuric and Traylor were 1st round picks as well.

Traylor was drafted by Dallas, who traded his rights on draft day to the Mavericks for the draft rights to Nowitzki (picked by Miilwaukee a few spots later).
 

PhxGametime

Formerly Bball_31
Joined
Jul 27, 2002
Posts
2,010
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
The games I watched (not sure how many, I believe I have like 9-15 gamefilm) but I really have no clue, I don't want to count... have like 40 tapes ;) he scores at elbows, similar to Amare Stoudemire, and his posts moves are 1 driving and getting dunk with that spin move that Stat uses or same spin move and his turnaround jumper (which isn't that bad actually down in paint to midrange). He may not be a traditional low post player but how often do the Suns do that... he just needs a little work on perimeter game right now but so did Shawn Marion.

If the Suns Drafted him, he'd back-up Marion and play the same type of role - just not from the 3PT line... and you're taking a chance, that if he adds a 3PT game (only 9 made, I believe - Marion was like 19) that you really have something. If not, he's a role player that fits system. There is no Prospect in League that can outrun Warrick or outjump him (possibly Nate Robinson) but he's 5'9 and I'm not going to use his Combine numbers to prove it - Andre Iguodala didn't have great Combine numbers but looks at his explosive dunks now (something you could see watching tape)...

His assists numbers, steals, and blocks are not overwhelming but they're not a weakness and he should be a pretty decent rebounder. In time, should become a Marion type defender... and it's not like he's that raw (21 PTS/game).
 

PhxGametime

Formerly Bball_31
Joined
Jul 27, 2002
Posts
2,010
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
coloradosun said:
My comparisons

Hakim Warrick=Darius Miles
Villanueava=Gadzuric
Taft=Traylor

I believe Miles, Gadzuric and Traylor were 1st round picks as well.


Tractor Traylor? That guy was 100 LB's bigger than Taft and a few inches shorter... unless you mean Johnny Taylor or Maurice Taylor?
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,047
Reaction score
58,936
Location
SoCal
coloradosun said:
My comparisons

Hakim Warrick=Darius Miles
Villanueava=Gadzuric
Taft=Traylor

I believe Miles, Gadzuric and Traylor were 1st round picks as well.

pretty gadzuric was a second round pick.

and none of the guys you listed resemble each other.

warrick is considered an undersized power player whereas miles was always considered a perimeter player. most teams have tried him at sg whereas warrick is a sf-pf tweener.

villanueva is also considered more of a 3 with time at the 4 whereas gadzuric was considered nothing but a post player, and really limited to the center slot at that. villanueva had all-around skills, including ball-handling whereas gadzuric couldn't stray from the paint if his life depended on it.

taft is an underachieving big man. traylor was a highly accomplished big man in college. traylor was extremely overweight and that's limited him. if he was ever able to truly get into shape he'd be an adequate nba baller. taft may be outta shape, but he was never considered rotund like traylor. also, taft has at least 2, maybe 3 inches on traylor. he's dropping 'cuz he played uninterested this year. many speculated that he was just waiting to get to the nba.

i'll gamble on taft. villanueva can flat out ball, but doesn't show the drive. warrick could be shawn marion II. for that reason i'd go after taft or warrick if available. the upside on taft is that if he was motivated he might be able to unburden the center position from amare.
 

coloradosun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2004
Posts
1,393
Reaction score
0
I have made this point before, the Suns will want face up players with 18 ft range. Every game I saw Warrick in he was the low post offense. Again the comparison to Miles is in the fact that Darius does not have a good jump shot. The move to the hoop is more effective if you have a jumper that you can draw your opponent out and then make the spin moves. If not the defense will sag in the lane and clog everything up.

If there is anyone I would gamble on it would be Blatche. There were some post before about trading for Garnett. I would not want Garnett on the team but I would want the next Garnett on the team.
 
Last edited:

coloradosun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2004
Posts
1,393
Reaction score
0
BbaLL_31 said:
Tractor Traylor? That guy was 100 LB's bigger than Taft and a few inches shorter... unless you mean Johnny Taylor or Maurice Taylor?

Tractor Traylor was seen as lazy in his early days. Last year he became motivated, if it takes that long to get Taft going, I would not make a stretch to pick him just because of his height.

Traylor could have been a Karl Malone type of player if he wanted to be. Taft could be Moses Malone type of player. You usually see that type of desire early but it is just not being mentioned by the scouts.
 
Last edited:

coloradosun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2004
Posts
1,393
Reaction score
0
coloradosun said:
My comparisons

Hakim Warrick=Darius Miles
Villanueava=Gadzuric
Taft=Traylor

I believe Miles, Gadzuric and Traylor were 1st round picks as well.

Here's hoopshype.com comparisons and I think I gave more credit to Warrick and Taft than they did.

Warrick=Jared Jeffries
Villaneuava=Lamar Odom (I don't see it)
Taft=Chris Wilcox
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,244
Reaction score
59,842
I believe the Suns already have a sure fire PF prospect on their team if all parties agreed to it. That player is JJ. In a interview I heard yesterday with Stoudemire, he even said that JJ was so versatile he could play PF.

I don't think Stoudemire was alluding to this as a long term idea other than to compliment JJ... that he was so talented he could play many positions.

I know many fans might be alienated to the idea, but I think JJ would fit better at the PF than Marion, although I know Marion is a tremendous rebounder. It would be similar to the idea of switching Magic Johnson to PF when he got older (before he developed HIV and retired). JJ is taller, has the physique, moves, defense and shot to play the PF. Also I think he could become a good rebounder.

However, it would also require the Suns to pick up a quality PG in the draft, trade or free agency. I do think it is easier to acquire quality smalls than quality bigs. I guess this is what got me thinking about it (again) along with Stoudemire's compliment about JJ. I still think the Suns should go big with their first round pick if he is the BPA, however, that player will likely take time to develop.

Personally, I would like the Suns draft a 4/5 ready to play at the NBA level, however, playing JJ at the PF could provide an immediate solution to a difficult problem if the Suns cannot acquire the players they need in the off season and allow Marion to return to SF and Q to SG. It would take another change of mind-set similar to what Amare made when he was moved to center.

Do I think this will happen.... no. Do I think it would work.... yes. And It would allow the Suns more time to develop a young big more slowly. The key would be for the Suns to acquire a quality back-up PG, re-sign Hunter, and acquire a quality caliber big (probably through the draft) that they can develop as a future 4/5.


Ok, now everyone can laugh. I know it's not going to happen. :) I guess I'm just stressed about tonight's game.
 

PhxGametime

Formerly Bball_31
Joined
Jul 27, 2002
Posts
2,010
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
If Granger, Blatche, Warrick, Frye, Taft, Graham, etc. and others are off board, I really wouldn't mind Francisco Garcia - one he's a pretty good 1/2/3 Prospect but with his shotblocking ability and JJ's ability to play the 4, that team would be really deep 1-4. Garcia isn't a great rebounder but: 4 AST, 1.5 STL, 1.5 BLK and another strong 3PT shooter at 6'7-6'8 and with a role playing F/C in 2nd Round or FA. The team could be strong for years.

I really like his shotblocking at the wings. Every single Prospect has some kind of hole in his game... as I'm sure almost every NBA player has weakness in his game.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,056
Posts
5,431,314
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top