5th year option declined for Reddick

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
"WalterFootball.com knows multiple teams that gave Reddick a grade range of between low in Round 3 and high in Round 4"...

SK messed up, TJ Watt could have been ours instead...moving on
I did. Lolol.


Sent from my mystical communication warp drive device thingy
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
And the offseason keeps getting better.

Time for Reddick to go.

I"d slam Keim but my guy, Malik Hooker did not get his option picked up either. Lol

Sent from my mystical communication warp drive device thingy
 

GuernseyCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Posts
10,123
Reaction score
5,681
Location
London UK
COVID-19 has given me the time to put together a list of 99 things I would have done if I knew what I know now. ;)
 
OP
OP
DevonCardsFan

DevonCardsFan

Registered User
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
5,819
Reaction score
802
Location
Your Mamas
I'm pissed that the Cards didn't select Tom Brady.

The difference is the Texans and Chiefs moved up to take Mahomes and Watson, right in front of AZ and AZ ended up with Rosen, Bradford and Reddick.

The Cards could have easily moved up a spot or 2 and got one of them.

The 10 and 12th pick were available for trade, The Cards sat right behind them and got outworked by other teams, to jump up and snipe the NFL MVP and Deshaun Watson, Cards are damn lucky they got Murray because that was a major fail by the Cards Front Office.

They were at 13 and Mahomes went 10 and Watson went 12. The Texans and Chiefs moved up to take the Superbowl MVP and Watson, leaving the Cards with Reddick, they could have had Mahomes, the Cards wanted Mahomes and Chiefs jumped them at got them.


Reddick, Chad Williams and Rosen could have easily been Mahomes.

Cards could have given up the Chad Williams pick to move up for Watson
 

phillycard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Posts
7,217
Reaction score
4,130
Location
The 215
I think that this is, perhaps, the most horrendous pick of the past 15 years. A walk-on tweener from Temple who shot up the draft board like a meteor because of hype. I was displeased with picks over the years but never saw a guy with such little chance of success.

Brandon Williams would like to differ. At least Haason has made at least ONE play in his entire time in AZ.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,063
Reaction score
13,837
And the offseason keeps getting better.

Time for Reddick to go.

I"d slam Keim but my guy, Malik Hooker did not get his option picked up either. Lol

Sent from my mystical communication warp drive device thingy

Easiest thing in the world to do is look back at the past and pick decisions apart

I pounded the table hard for Malik Hooker he was the best ball hawk I ever seen and he hasn’t been healthy ever since he was drafted.
 

jf-08

chohan
Administrator
Super Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
27,888
Reaction score
23,719
Location
Eye in the Sky
The difference is the Texans and Chiefs moved up to take Mahomes and Watson, right in front of AZ and AZ ended up with Rosen, Bradford and Reddick.

The Cards could have easily moved up a spot or 2 and got one of them.

The 10 and 12th pick were available for trade, The Cards sat right behind them and got outworked by other teams, to jump up and snipe the NFL MVP and Deshaun Watson, Cards are damn lucky they got Murray because that was a major fail by the Cards Front Office.

They were at 13 and Mahomes went 10 and Watson went 12. The Texans and Chiefs moved up to take the Superbowl MVP and Watson, leaving the Cards with Reddick, they could have had Mahomes, the Cards wanted Mahomes and Chiefs jumped them at got them.


Reddick, Chad Williams and Rosen could have easily been Mahomes.

Cards could have given up the Chad Williams pick to move up for Watson

Right. Every draft there are players in need that get picked before another team and teams jump in front of them via trade too to get them.

Unfortunately our team wasn't good enough to sacrifice a first round pick in the future to trade up.

Looking back, should we have? Possibly, but hind sight is always 20-20.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,419
Reaction score
29,825
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Right. Every draft there are players in need that get picked before another team and teams jump in front of them via trade too to get them.

Unfortunately our team wasn't good enough to sacrifice a first round pick in the future to trade up.

Looking back, should we have? Possibly, but hind sight is always 20-20.

It's INSANE to say with the benefit of hindsight we only "possibly" should have traded a first-round pick for one guy who would have been OROY and lead his team to the playoffs the last two seasons or another who won the MVP in his second season and was the Super Bowl MVP in his third. WILD.

Of course, looking back, those guys probably should've (and would've) gone 1-2 in the draft.

At the time, considering where we were (Trying to hold a potential championship roster together with Carson Palmer at the helm), it would have been a weird choice, especially if you weren't prepared to immediately cast Palmer aside (he ended up injured that season, anyway). But it would have been the brave and right one.
 

jf-08

chohan
Administrator
Super Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
27,888
Reaction score
23,719
Location
Eye in the Sky
It's INSANE to say with the benefit of hindsight we only "possibly" should have traded a first-round pick for one guy who would have been OROY and lead his team to the playoffs the last two seasons or another who won the MVP in his second season and was the Super Bowl MVP in his third. WILD.

Every other team would do that trade in a heartbeat, including the Cards. I'm not defending our piss poor drafting, but I can't stand Monday morning QBing on stuff like this.

I wish we would have drafted Adrian Peterson, Mahomes, Watson, Brett Favre, Dan Fouts, etc. If someone thinks that we shouldn't have, then they are an idiot. Everyone is in agreement NOW that we should have done something, but at the time, it wasn't so clear for the team to do something.
 
OP
OP
DevonCardsFan

DevonCardsFan

Registered User
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
5,819
Reaction score
802
Location
Your Mamas
Right. Every draft there are players in need that get picked before another team and teams jump in front of them via trade too to get them.

Unfortunately our team wasn't good enough to sacrifice a first round pick in the future to trade up.

Looking back, should we have? Possibly, but hind sight is always 20-20.

The Capital for 2 spots isnt much
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,814
Reaction score
24,024
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Easiest thing in the world to do is look back at the past and pick decisions apart

I pounded the table hard for Malik Hooker he was the best ball hawk I ever seen and he hasn’t been healthy ever since he was drafted.

Oh, he was my pick too--I grew up outside the town he played in. And, if we take him, circumsatances change, and he may not get hurt, and...ah well.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
Gotcha, but to be fair TR you did say past 15 years and didn't differentiate round. :)
What about the DE from Connecticut we chose in the 2nd round?

*google*

Cody Brown!

Sent from my mystical communication warp drive device thingy
 
Top