7/27/2005 Insider - Brown's dream job gives him Knick's nightmare roster

sunsfn

Registered User
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Posts
4,522
Reaction score
0
Updated: July 27, 2005, 3:06 AM ET

Brown's dream job gives him Knicks' nightmare roster

http://insider.espn.go.com/insider/index
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/archive?columnist=ford_chad&root=nba
By Chad Ford


It's always nice when wishes come true. Right?

Larry Brown wanted Rick Carlisle's job and an NBA title and got both in Detroit.

Earlier this year, Brown wanted a golden parachute from Detroit and got a sweet one with the Cavs.

This month, Brown wanted the Pistons to pay him $6 million dollars to go away. Got that too.

Brown has said coaching the New York Knicks is his "dream job." Now Knicks president Isiah Thomas is about to make Brown's dream come true.

Larry should be the poster boy for the Make-A-Wish Foundation.

But, Larry, be careful what you wish for.

The Knicks gig might be Larry's "dream job" in theory, but dig a little deeper and it could be his nightmare.

Brown "loves" New York. Thinks Isiah Thomas is "neat." Believes that Madison Square Garden is a "special" place.

The 15-man, $120-million dollar roster that Isiah has built? Not so much.

Brown might be the best coach in the NBA, but even he knows he doesn't have much of a chance to compete with the Pistons, Pacers, Heat and Nets next season.

Even if the Knicks could compete, his "trade"-mark, so to speak, beyond his coaching ability and his wandering eyes, is his constant desire to fiddle with his roster. Simply put, Brown likes to make trades.

Lots of them.

No one is safe in New York.



He'll love you one day and have to get rid of you the next.

Just this week Brown did a 180 on Knicks point guard Stephon Marbury. In Athens, he reportedly tried to get Marbury kicked off the team after Stephon questioned Brown's offense. Last week he said Marbury "knows how I feel about him" and added that he had a "good" relationship with Marbury. Rhetoric or not, how long before Brown tries to get Steph shipped out of town?

Fact is, no one believes for a minute that the Knicks team as it stands today will be the Knicks team that finishes the season under Brown.

Neither Marbury nor backcourt mate Jamal Crawford plays the way Brown likes his guards to play. His frontline isn't long and athletic enough. Many of the players on the Knicks roster aren't committed to the defense Brown wants them to play.

Isiah can talk all he wants about retaining control of the team. But given the mandate (and paycheck) that Coach Brown has gotten, President Thomas won't have control of it for long.

"There's going to be changes," a longtime associate of Brown told Insider. "Larry's going to want a lot of say on the team. He'll tell Isiah something different. But within a week he'll be in his office looking to make deals. He's going to want guys that he's comfortable with. He's going to need his lead guy [Marbury] to buy in. If he doesn't, he's gone. I don't care who it is. If Isiah holds his ground, he'll just go to the press. Larry's the master of this. Isiah may think he's up to the challenge. I don't see it."

Who's likely to get kicked to the curb once LB takes over?

Stephon Marbury, PG: Marbury has been Isiah's signature acquisition (for better and worse) during his two-year tenure with the Knicks. Earlier in the month, Isiah said that the Knicks would never try to trade Marbury. Then again, Brown said he would never coach the Knicks.

Insider couldn't find one Brown associate who thought the coach and his point guard could coexist unless Marbury agrees to move to the two and Isiah lets Brown bring in a more traditional point guard to run the team. Brown might be able to handle Marbury's offense-first game, much as he did Allen Iverson's, if he had a reliable option to run the team.

Who fits the bill? Eric Snow is at the top of Brown's list. Brown loved Snow in Philadelphia and tried to get Joe Dumars to trade for him in Detroit. Snow is conservative with the ball, plays great defense, and, most importantly, completely buys into Brown's system. The Cavs would be happy to give him and the four years, $25 million left on his contract away. A trade of Snow, Drew Gooden and Aleksandar Pavlovic for Tim Thomas would work under the cap.

Brown also likes Earl Watson and could have Thomas try to work out a sign-and-trade with Memphis Grizzlies president Jerry West. Brown's also a Speedy Claxton fan, and he might be available from New Orleans. And don't forget about Knicks rookie Nate Robinson. Brown loves him and is going to want to find a big role for him coming off the bench.

It's quite possible Marbury won't be traded, in large part because the Knicks will have a hard time finding a taker. His salary is so out of whack with his declining rep that the Knicks would have to take a huge hit to get rid of him and the four years, $75 million left on his contract. It's difficult to come up with any team that would trade for Marbury at that price. The Celtics and the Raptors are the only two teams in need of a point guard that might try it, but both are major long shots.

Jamal Crawford, PG/SG: Crawford rained down a heart-stopping 7.3 3-point shots a game last season and connected on only 2.6 of them (36 percent). To put that into perspective, Detroit's starting backcourt of Chauncey Billups and Richard Hamilton didn't take that many 3s per game combined (and made 40 percent).

Larry hates 3-point shots and hates them even more when you miss them. That's bad news for Crawford because he doesn't do much else. On offense, he rarely gets to the line (averaging fewer than one free throw per quarter) and has a pedestrian 2-to-1 assist-to-turnover ratio. He gathers fewer than three rebounds per game, which is weak for a 6-5 guard. And he's a lazy defender to boot.

He does have great size at the point, when he's allowed to play there, but doesn't have the instincts, temperament, unselfishness or self-control that Brown demands out of his point guards.

The problem for Brown and Isiah is finding a trade partner to match the 6 years, $50 million left on Crawford's contract. The Lakers are looking for a point guard and Crawford is familiar with the triangle, but the Lakers are trying to keep bad deals off the books so that they can have cap space in 2007.

The Blazers might be another possibility. The team is trying to get help in the backcourt, and is willing to swap Darius Miles for some help. Brown loves long, athletic forwards like Miles, so that could be a fit. The salaries match up well, though the Knicks would have to wait until the end of August to make a trade because of base-year issues with Miles.

Quentin Richardson, SG/SF: Richardson has many of the same issues Crawford does. He took a whopping eight 3-pointers a game last season with Phoenix, and, like Crawford, made only 36 percent. Combined, he and Crawford averaged more threes than Brown's entire Pistons team last season -- by a lot. He likewise does a poor job of getting to the line.

Two things might keep him in a Knicks uniform. One, Richardson is one of the best rebounding guards in the game. Two, he is excellent at posting up other guards, a skill that was under-utilized in the Suns' go-go style.

Tim Thomas, SF: Thomas knows already what it feels like to play in Brown's doghouse. He also knows what it feels like to be traded by Brown.

The two didn't have a great relationship in Philadelphia and it's tough to see Thomas fitting into Brown's world. The good news for Knicks fans is that Thomas is in the last year of his contract and therefore very tradable.

Look for the Knicks to use both Thomas and Penny Hardaway's expiring contract to pick up players Brown covets.

Besides, both Isiah and Brown are high on super soph Trevor Ariza and want to give him a chance to blossom in New York.

Maurice Taylor, Malik Rose, Jerome Williams, Michael Sweetney and David Lee, PF: The Knicks have five, yes five, undersized power forwards. Rose, Williams and Lee are the type of gritty, blue-collar fours Brown likes. Sweetney looks like he has enough potential to keep around. Taylor is probably the odd man out there if the Knicks can find a taker. His combination of lots of shooting, no rebounding and no defense probably won't sit well with Brown.

Channing Frye, PF/C: He's long and pretty athletic, which Brown should like. But Frye isn't the toughest guy in the world, isn't a great rebounder and prefers finesse to brute strength in the paint. He'll be a project under Brown and probably won't see the light of day for the next year or so.

Jerome James, C: This is where Brown will earn his paycheck. If he can get any sort of effort out of James, this won't be a bad signing for the Knicks. But as Sonics fans can attest, Nate McMillan tried everything in the book and gave up.

Look for James to be the first guy that Brown proclaims love for and puts in the doghouse in the next breath.




-
 

JPlay

JPlay
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Posts
1,211
Reaction score
0
They don't have a bad roster, they just have an underachieving roster. That's the reason Brown is there.

This team is good talent wise:

PG-Marbury
SG-Crawford or Q
SF-Tim Thomas/ Ariza
PF-Malik Rose/Sweetney
C-Jerome James/Channing Frye
 

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,496
Reaction score
946
Location
Gilbert, AZ
JPlay said:
They don't have a bad roster, they just have an underachieving roster. That's the reason Brown is there.

This team is good talent wise:

PG-Marbury
SG-Crawford or Q
SF-Tim Thomas/ Ariza
PF-Malik Rose/Sweetney
C-Jerome James/Channing Frye

surely you jest. Even in the Eastern conference that's a below-average roster. All of the scoring is in the backcourt with players who are average or below average shooters.

Joe Mama
 

JPlay

JPlay
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Posts
1,211
Reaction score
0
Joe Mama said:
surely you jest. Even in the Eastern conference that's a below-average roster. All of the scoring is in the backcourt with players who are average or below average shooters.

Joe Mama

If you look at the Suns roster before last year you could say we were short on shooters also. The only pure shooter being Nash. We'll see what Larry Brown can get out of them. The Pistons only had Chauncey and no other 3 pt shooters.

Nash
JJ
Q
Marion
Amare
 

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,496
Reaction score
946
Location
Gilbert, AZ
JPlay said:
If you look at the Suns roster before last year you could say we were short on shooters also. The only pure shooter being Nash. We'll see what Larry Brown can get out of them. The Pistons only had Chauncey and no other 3 pt shooters.

Nash
JJ
Q
Marion
Amare

First of all I don't expect Marbury, Crawford, or Q to shoot 48% from beyond the arc like JJ did last year. Secondly, unlike D'Antoni, Larry Brown doesn't want his players to shoot a lot of three-point shots. He now has three guards who are quantity shooters, and he's got a lame, soft frontcourt.

Joe Mama
 

Dustbuster

Veteran
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Posts
164
Reaction score
0
JPlay said:
If you look at the Suns roster before last year you could say we were short on shooters also. The only pure shooter being Nash. We'll see what Larry Brown can get out of them. The Pistons only had Chauncey and no other 3 pt shooters.

Nash
JJ
Q
Marion
Amare

I completely disagree. JJ developed a reputation as one of the best pure shooters in the league this past year, shooting an extremely high percentage for a shooting guard, not to mention the second highest percentage in the league from deep. There is no one on that Knicks roster that shoots with anywhere near the efficiency of JJ. That puts the Suns with two pure shooters in the starting lineup, and together they certainly averaged a better FG% than any starting backcourt tandem in the league. I don't think you can compare Crawford and Marbury in any way, shape, or form to the what the Suns fielded last year in terms of efficiency.
 

Errntknght

Registered User
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
6,342
Reaction score
319
Location
Phoenix
Larry Brown is out of his gourd! I guess I could put it more kindly and say he is a sucker for a challenge.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,490
Reaction score
2,274
Location
ASFN
With a team that bad why would you bother paying for a high priced coach?
 

JPlay

JPlay
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Posts
1,211
Reaction score
0
Dustbuster said:
I completely disagree. JJ developed a reputation as one of the best pure shooters in the league this past year, shooting an extremely high percentage for a shooting guard, not to mention the second highest percentage in the league from deep. There is no one on that Knicks roster that shoots with anywhere near the efficiency of JJ. That puts the Suns with two pure shooters in the starting lineup, and together they certainly averaged a better FG% than any starting backcourt tandem in the league. I don't think you can compare Crawford and Marbury in any way, shape, or form to the what the Suns fielded last year in terms of efficiency.

Did you read where I said BEFORE last year. JJ was not an efficient 3point shooter. I'm sure Larry Brown will have everyone here eating there words. He did turn around that awful Philadelphia franchise with less talent, so give him credit.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,487
Reaction score
4,878
Location
Harrisburg, PA
I like Larry Brown. I also like the Knicks. However, their roster is just horrible. While they may have several good players and some promising young talent, the TEAM is built like crap. You have two identical players on your point guard position, neither one of them are good defensively.

You have two injured have-beens who are not worth a moldy cheese sandwich on 2.

You have a BUNCH of unersized power forwards, and you really don't have a center.

I don't see Jerome James being any kind of positive factor.

I think that Eric Snow would really make a difference... Snow, Marbury, and Q with Ariza and Crawford coming off the bench would be pretty nice.

Rose and Sweetney are quite efficent on 4, but that 5 position is gonna kick their ass. They're gonna miss Thomas and Mohhamed.
 

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
-
Mulli808 said:
You have two identical players on your point guard position, neither one of them are good defensively.

You have two injured have-beens who are not worth a moldy cheese sandwich on 2.

You have a BUNCH of undersized power forwards, and you really don't have a center.

Seems like that used to be the Suns.

Since three of the guys used to be Suns...

Actually this IS a Larry Brown type team in that they have more talent than production. Still, I would expect some radical surgery.
 

F-Dog

lurker
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Posts
3,637
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
Larry Brown coached the Clippers once. He's not picky.


I think he'll get along well with Marbury, honestly. Marbury is at the point where he's almost certainly eager to buy in, and Brown's system doesn't demand things that Marbury can't provide.

Look at it this way: Brown just finished two seasons with Chauncey Billups as his PG. There is nothing that Chauncey can do that Marbury can't do at least as well, except possibly on defense, and I think Marbury will be motivated to recapture some of his defensive skill and effort thanks to the new regime.


Q and Malik Rose are a couple more Larry Brown types. Larry likes discipline, but he loves confidence, and those guys should give him enough of both to become cornerstone players.

On the other hand, Jamal Crawford might want to move all of his stuff to Larry Brown's doghouse, since he'll be taking up permanent residence. And, Channing Frye is exactly the kind of soft Euro-style big man that Brown will never play as long as he's got other options.

At the very least, Brown will make the Knicks interesting...well, slightly interesting, at least.
 

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,496
Reaction score
946
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I just listened to Larry Brown get interviewed on SportsCenter. I really hope this guy falls flat on his face in New York. Of course we all know he'll just blame it on the players.

He acts like he is genuinely hurt by the way things ended in Detroit. He completely manipulated his way off their staff, and the worst part is that they had to agree to a buyout to get rid of him.

I still would like to see the Marbury succeed. However with Isaiah Thomas says the GM and now Larry Brown as the coach I'm really hoping the New York Knicks fail miserably this season.

Joe
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
551,147
Posts
5,384,433
Members
6,309
Latest member
Broncosfan
Top