Did I say that Kerr was Mr Wizard and a brilliant GM? Please, stop putting words into my mouth when responding to my posts, you read about 10 different things into my post that I said NOTHING about.
Someone else stated that they thought Kerr left because he wanted to keep Amare, I refuted that pointing out Kerr agreed with letting Amare walk. That is all I had to say about Kerr.
And as for if letting Amare walk was a good move... it was. The guy is a shadow of an "all-star". You can make the debate that they should have traded him a few seasons earlier, but as far as not handing him 100 million goes. It was the right move, how you can think up to this point it wasnt is beyond me. Sure, we probably get to be a one and done team in the playoffs last year, then this season we are stuck with a washed up Amare and owe him 80 million dollars in what is probably the most untradeable contract in the NBA.
And even if we dont make the playoffs during Amare's tenure in New York, it doesnt mean we should have kept him, because I doubt Amare taking up 40% of the cap figure while putting up 17 and 7 on 43% shooting while being the worst defender in the league would have been pushing us over the top.
And I fully expect his numbers to further decline. His talent has fallen off a cliff, and while I expected that to happen, I thought he would get injured first. He gone downhill this quick while staying relatively healthy. I cant imagine how bad he will look once he actually gets hurt.
It seemed to me that you used Kerr to confrim your belief that not signing Amare was a good move. I guess you didn't. I just pointed out that Kerr was a horrible GM, which he was.
I suggested that Nash would love to have him, I think I am right. Nash is the leader of this franchise and the owner took his #1 option away, while not replacing it. Steve knows more about winning basketball games than Sarver or Kerr.
Sarver has to be losing a butt load of money at the box office. That is not why he owns the Suns. If it continues and Amare stays healthy, at some point that 100 Mil would have been a bargain.
Everyone keeps suggesting Amare's doom and gloom due to 17 and 7, 43% shooting. You suggest it is the beginning of the end. I just don't see it that way. Lot's of player changes and no point guard until recently. His defense actually seems better this year. There is concern but to suggest the beginning of the end is just not fair at this point.
If you have even paid attention, the Knicks have been a mess since Melo arrived. There is hope with Lin but I am not convinced that Amare and Melo can coexist. Melo will not allow it. Amare was 4 for 7 last night, Melo 7 for 20. I have never seen a player so full of himself as Carmelo Anthony. If they somehow work it out, D' Antoni has to be COY.
If Amare was still with the Suns, I expect he would still be producing just as he was prior to leaving, assuming he didn't put on the XTRA 20 Lbs and still was working with the Suns training staff. I know you will dispute that, so be it.
AT THIS POINT, as I suggested, the Suns would be far better off if they had kept Amare. It is not even close. What is not to understand.
We would have more wins and more revenue. That is a fact whether you want to admit it or not.
The future, past this season, is the only question. Sarvers decision could turn out to be a good one. I have said that many times. I understand why Sarver did not guarantee all the years of his contract.
If Amare breaks down and the Suns regroup with new talent to their winning ways of the past, Sarver made the right move.
If Amare does not breakdown and the Suns continue in the lottery, Sarver made the wrong decision.
I know you and others are desparate to have Amare fail. He hasn't at this point. The Knicks are winning and they are a hit at the box office. Many feel they could be a threat in the playoffs and could beat anyone. Melo will have to wake up for that to happen.
The Suns certainly have failed. On the court and at the Box office.
Will that continue for the forseeable future, for both franchises?