A Theory on Why Keim Needs to Go

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,405
Reaction score
4,151
Location
Monroe NC
I think it’s definitely having a great QB for all those teams, but it’s also having a vision, not a plan, for your roster. All those teams had a vision for how they’re allocating their resources, and they stuck to it because they only needed to hit on A, B, and C to keep the machine running.

I think that part of Keim’s problem is that he had a plan, not a vision. He’s planned for Diche to replace Campbell. He had a plan for Humphries to be the foundation at LT. He had a plan for Baker to replace Honey Badger and for Minter to replace Dansby and for Bucannon to replace Washington.

All of those guys turned out to be downgraded, and so you temporarily staunch the bleeding with free agents and then have to use more draft capital to replace the guys you don’t extend.

That was the word I was looking for and couldn't think of it until later in another post. Spot on.
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,405
Reaction score
4,151
Location
Monroe NC
I think it’s definitely having a great QB for all those teams, but it’s also having a vision, not a plan, for your roster. All those teams had a vision for how they’re allocating their resources, and they stuck to it because they only needed to hit on A, B, and C to keep the machine running.

I think that part of Keim’s problem is that he had a plan, not a vision. He’s planned for Diche to replace Campbell. He had a plan for Humphries to be the foundation at LT. He had a plan for Baker to replace Honey Badger and for Minter to replace Dansby and for Bucannon to replace Washington.

All of those guys turned out to be downgraded, and so you temporarily staunch the bleeding with free agents and then have to use more draft capital to replace the guys you don’t extend.

I just went back and looked up the history of all of the assistant coaches that went on to become head coaches from the Belichick coaching tree. None were very successful to date with O'Brian actually looking like he will be a success. What almost all of them inherited were dismal QBs and I mean the barrel muck of QBs, such as Brady Quinn, Kyle Orton, Derek Anderson, Seneca Wallace and Jake Delhomme. Dan Orlovsky, Jon Kitna, Charlie Frye, A.J. Feeley and Jay Fiedler. Brock Osweiler, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Brian Hoyer, Ryan Mallett, Case Keenum, T.J. Yates, Tom Savage and Brandon Weeden. Journeymen at best and God awful at worse. A good QB does increase your odds of being successful.

The other part is cultivating that QB and running a system that fits their best strengths and further developing their weaknesses into strengths. I have read several articles that suggest that Rosen's best fit is in a West coast offense. I am wondering if this is in fact true.
 
OP
OP
kerouac9

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,391
Reaction score
29,777
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I just went back and looked up the history of all of the assistant coaches that went on to become head coaches from the Belichick coaching tree. None were very successful to date with O'Brian actually looking like he will be a success. What almost all of them inherited were dismal QBs and I mean the barrel muck of QBs, such as Brady Quinn, Kyle Orton, Derek Anderson, Seneca Wallace and Jake Delhomme. Dan Orlovsky, Jon Kitna, Charlie Frye, A.J. Feeley and Jay Fiedler. Brock Osweiler, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Brian Hoyer, Ryan Mallett, Case Keenum, T.J. Yates, Tom Savage and Brandon Weeden. Journeymen at best and God awful at worse. A good QB does increase your odds of being successful.

The other part is cultivating that QB and running a system that fits their best strengths and further developing their weaknesses into strengths. I have read several articles that suggest that Rosen's best fit is in a West coast offense. I am wondering if this is in fact true.

I'd add that having a great QB is a necessary but not sufficient requirement to long-term success. Look at the Saints and the Chargers. Both Rivers and Brees are among the 5 best QBs of their generation and among the 10 best QBs of all time.

The Saints went 7-9 three straight seasons and four seasons out of five from 2012 to 2016 while shuffling through a whole bunch of defensive coordinators. Only with a miraculous draft class did they return to dominance.

The Chargers have been to the playoffs once in the last eight seasons and finished below .500 three times in that span.

The quarterback is the foundation, but you have to have a vision for how you complete the roster around them to be successful.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,276
Reaction score
6,213
Location
Dallas, TX
I'd add that having a great QB is a necessary but not sufficient requirement to long-term success. Look at the Saints and the Chargers. Both Rivers and Brees are among the 5 best QBs of their generation and among the 10 best QBs of all time.

The Saints went 7-9 three straight seasons and four seasons out of five from 2012 to 2016 while shuffling through a whole bunch of defensive coordinators. Only with a miraculous draft class did they return to dominance.

The Chargers have been to the playoffs once in the last eight seasons and finished below .500 three times in that span.

The quarterback is the foundation, but you have to have a vision for how you complete the roster around them to be successful.
True but you almost have no chance without a very good QB. There’s not a more important part of an NFL football team!!!
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,245
Reaction score
14,305
Vision is one word. I prefer the term identity. We have never had a clearly defined identity as a team.

the Cards HAD one: no risk it, no biscuit

on offense: vertical passing offense with 6 deep shots a game
on defense: it was man to man coverage/ blitzing / single or zero safety deep


assuming Keim made the Wilks call, or, was supportive of it: how can a competent GM hire a coach and staff that completely changes the identity of the team -- a team that he himself believed could compete for a playoff spot.

Alternatively -- was he ready to change the identity of the offense to accommodate...…………. Sam Bradford for 1 year?

Neither are good decisions
 
OP
OP
kerouac9

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,391
Reaction score
29,777
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Vision is one word. I prefer the term identity. We have never had a clearly defined identity as a team.

I think those are different things. I think you use your identity when scouting — does player X fit in with how you want your team to run?

I think that Keim had PLANs -- His plan was to replace Bobby Massie with D.J. Humphries, and then replace Veldheer with Humphries. His plan was to replace Calais Campbell with Nkeimdiche. The problem was that he couldn't adjust his plan.

Vision is more flexible. If Massie turns out to be better than you thought, or 'Diche isn't quite ready, to find a way to shift and seize strategic opportunities.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,451
Reaction score
7,405
Location
Chandler
I think those are different things. I think you use your identity when scouting — does player X fit in with how you want your team to run?

I think that Keim had PLANs -- His plan was to replace Bobby Massie with D.J. Humphries, and then replace Veldheer with Humphries. His plan was to replace Calais Campbell with Nkeimdiche. The problem was that he couldn't adjust his plan.

Vision is more flexible. If Massie turns out to be better than you thought, or 'Diche isn't quite ready, to find a way to shift and seize strategic opportunities.

I think he has/had vision. I think he was looking at this year as being a down year & rebuilding/tooling the team next year when he has more cap space & is rid of most of the bad contracts. I think he knew when going for it with an older team that if it didn't work out that he would have this year as a down year while looking forward to next. I don't think he thought it would be this bad though. We'll have at least 70mil in cap space next year. Granted we have a lot of holes to fill. This will be the first time Keim has had a lot of cap space & a high draft pick. If he puts together a crap team next year I'll be fully on board to can him.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,286
Reaction score
40,312
Location
Colorado
I think those are different things. I think you use your identity when scouting — does player X fit in with how you want your team to run?

I think that Keim had PLANs -- His plan was to replace Bobby Massie with D.J. Humphries, and then replace Veldheer with Humphries. His plan was to replace Calais Campbell with Nkeimdiche. The problem was that he couldn't adjust his plan.

Vision is more flexible. If Massie turns out to be better than you thought, or 'Diche isn't quite ready, to find a way to shift and seize strategic opportunities.
Fair
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,636
Posts
5,408,949
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top