I would bet that a lot of you empathetic Josh lovers married the first girl you 'dated'.
You must be registered for see images attach
I would bet that a lot of you empathetic Josh lovers married the first girl you 'dated'.
But you stated it was BS that he was some sort of QB whisperer. So it's a lose lose?He said he could develop Rosen.If he ends up drafting Murray and trading Rosen it tells me KK is full of crap.
I would bet that a lot of you empathetic Josh lovers married the first girl you 'dated'.
You must be registered for see images attach
But you stated it was BS that he was some sort of QB whisperer. So it's a lose lose?
Unless numbers and tape are correct. Then it's called risk management.
We gave Josh a chance. He sucked by all measurable standards. Every...single...one...
Are we drafting a running back, too? David Johnson's numbers were way down and it couldn't possibly be the coaching or the plays he was asked to run. Maybe we could trade him too?
Didn't you know that Josh missing wide open receivers in the flat were all because of Steve Wilks and the line? I mean he did that at UCLA too but that was also UCLA's fault as well. Nothing is his fault. Didn't you know?
Still finished #9 in rushing and had multiple analytic points at or over league average.
Good players still manage to do something other than finish dead last in virtually everything
"Risk management" isn't drafting a guy who has decided to hide or be ambiguous about almost all of his numbers and measurables along the way. It's called a dart throw.Unless numbers and tape are correct. Then it's called risk management.
"Risk management" isn't drafting a guy who has decided to hide or be ambiguous about almost all of his numbers and measurables along the way. It's called a dart throw.