He is not. However, I have been talking to an abuse victim during this entire trial. She is 100% convinced Amber is a liar and the evidence in the trial backed that up. She said it's killing her that people like Amber are actually hurting real abuse victims like her. She is recently coming out of a really abusive relationship. She mentioned so much of her demeanor and actions don't mesh with how she reacted and actions she took.
No most of the evidence did not. The police said they found no evidence in multiple calls. There was no prosecutorial evidence which is why he was never charged. Forensic experts say that one of the photos she submitted as evidence was clearly doctored. She lied about covering her bruises up with this make up kit. The manufacturer said she lied because that kit didn't exist when she claims she used it. Her testimony on multiple occasions changed or didn't mesh with previous versions. She contradicted herself multiple times. None of his previous relationships with women demonstrated any like behavior. Not one other person came forward.
I particularly like the tissue weeping photo op pause that she did.
And that may be part of it - the jury wasn't convinced who was abusing who, or if they both were.
Is it just me or does it still look like she has a bruise in the ”unaltered“ photo? The color is definitely enhanced in the other photo but the bruise seems to be more enhanced than added. A few months ago I got a wicked bruise that I was trying to show a friend. The camera wasn’t picking it up very well so I adjusted the brightness contrast/etc to better illustrate how it looked. Kinda seems like this is what she did but to even a greater degree. That doesn’t mean there wasn’t a light bruise there to start with though. But like I said in an earlier post, I think they are both most likely sh***y people.
If you look at her other cheek it just looks like makeup. You don't have a good angle of the other cheek but the colors match. Again though, it doesn't explain why she lied and said those were two different videos taken at completely different times unless there was an attempt to doctor. Unless you doctored, her lying about it made zero sense. It's so obvious it's the same photo. There is a video out there was someone took both photos and overlayed them in real time and they perfectly match.
I’m far from an expert. Generally in these situations I just trust the courts. They arent 100% right, but I think they get it right most of the time.
Honestly, I only saw evidence that Heard physically abused him.
Yep. I mean everyone from the police to other experts all came down on Johnny's side. So, it wasn't just the jury. Her case fell apart because it appeared to be mostly manufactured.
Exactly which show how flimsy her case was. Getting a jury to side with you on "all elements" of defamation almost never happens. Some damage is irreversible though. Even in this thread you will see regardless of no evidence to prosecute him and a civil court trial in his favor (which are the only recourse a falsely accused person has) there will ALWAYS be people who will never believe him.
Did you even see what the defamation was? What she said and why he was suing her?
I did. Did you watch the end of the trial where the judge read line for line the questions asked to the jury? If not, I recommend listen to all the questions the judge covered. The Jury clearly said Amber defamed him. The Jury clearly said they felt she manufactured and lied and her statements were false.
Well one of Johnny's ex-lawyers made a statement after he stopped representing Johhny which is technically defamation. That's why she won that portion. The ruling was against the legal team. Not anything Johnny said.
Here you go. This is what the Jury was instructed to base the decision on. Here are some of the answers. Seems pretty cut and dry and why her case had to be the flimsiest of flimsy to get the jury to find for him on "all elements" which almost never happens. Jury instructions on this are strict.
Fine, forget it. You win. You can continue to post books on this. I won't be responding.
