ThisWe have less playoff wins than the JAGS since the merger. That's just stunning. Incredible, generational incompetence.
ThisWe have less playoff wins than the JAGS since the merger. That's just stunning. Incredible, generational incompetence.
We have less playoff wins than the JAGS since the merger. That's just stunning. Incredible, generational incompetence.
And half of those wins were in 1 postseason.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
You could argue, though, the Cardinals have been more playoff efficient than the Jags or the other teams listed. Think of all the times Detroit has made the playoffs, Texans, etc. The Cardinals don't get there often, but when they do they typically aren't one and done. Every single one of those teams and their fans would love to have a Super Bowl appearance.We have less playoff wins than the JAGS since the merger. That's just stunning. Incredible, generational incompetence.
Considering last season and the last 10+ years, this post doesn't hold up well.You could argue, though, the Cardinals have been more playoff efficient than the Jags or the other teams listed. Think of all the times Detroit has made the playoffs, Texans, etc. The Cardinals don't get there often, but when they do they typically aren't one and done. Every single one of those teams and their fans would love to have a Super Bowl appearance.
Considering it's based off the freaking merger, not just 10 years....Considering last season and the last 10+ years, this post doesn't hold up well.
Like I said...You could argue, though, the Cardinals have been more playoff efficient than the Jags or the other teams listed. Think of all the times Detroit has made the playoffs, Texans, etc. The Cardinals don't get there often, but when they do they typically aren't one and done. Every single one of those teams and their fans would love to have a Super Bowl appearance.
I feel like that should get more play. That level of ineptitude should force the league to do something to “protect the shield” bc it’s been tarnished in Detroit, Cleveland and St. Louis/Arizona.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
We've been focusing on WR's at #23 but maybe ARZ is looking for a pass catching TE to be our #2 receiver.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I anticipate that we are looking for a pass-catching TE to be our second option in the passing game. His name is Zach Ertz.We've been focusing on WR's at #23 but maybe ARZ is looking for a pass catching TE to be our #2 receiver.
If Ertz was a #2 then we wouldn't be talking about drafting a WR (unfortunately Keim may actually think we are set with Moore and Ertz). At this point in his career Ertz is more of a #3 but nothing wrong with having 2 pass catching TE's on field at the same time.I anticipate that we are looking for a pass-catching TE to be our second option in the passing game. His name is Zach Ertz.
Not really. You shouldn't draft to fill a need this year; you should draft to build your roster for 2-3 years down the road. Even if we had a top 10 pick, it's unlikely given past history that we'd get a WR prospect who's immediately ready to step in on the outside and catch 80 passes for 800 yards or whatever.If Ertz was a #2 then we wouldn't be talking about drafting a WR (unfortunately Keim may actually think we are set with Moore and Ertz). At this point in his career Ertz is more of a #3 but nothing wrong with having 2 pass catching TE's on field at the same time.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Let him sit out.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I'm just saying TE or WR, a #2 can be either. Kyle Pitts had an outstanding rookie year last year, don't always assume a WR will have a better rookie year than a TE. Likely probably won't go before 3rd round but he definitely has big play potential despite having a pedestrian 40 time. I don't even want Likely in first 3 rounds, my Round 1 - 3 picks would be OL, EDGE & CB but I can see ARZ shocking everyone by taking Likely.Not really. You shouldn't draft to fill a need this year; you should draft to build your roster for 2-3 years down the road. Even if we had a top 10 pick, it's unlikely given past history that we'd get a WR prospect who's immediately ready to step in on the outside and catch 80 passes for 800 yards or whatever.
There's a lot of strum and drang about drafting a WR high because we have a gaping hole where our Y receiver should be across from Hopkins, and right now Antoine Wesley is the guy slotted in there.
Take a look at the recent history of top TE picks and you'll see why it's even LESS likely we'll fill that hole with a rookie than if we'd just drafted a WR.
Why?Let him sit out.
He has 2 years left...IMO threatening to sit out now, is silly. Call his bluff and let him sit.Why?
Market is what it is.
Either you pay him what the market is or trade him now. Market is not going to get any cheaper.
Herbert is getting 55 mill a year next year.Why?
Market is what it is.
Either you pay him what the market is or trade him now. Market is not going to get any cheaper.
That is quite frankly stupid.He has 2 years left...IMO threatening to sit out now, is silly. Call his bluff and let him sit.