conraddobler said:Some good points but ending with bringing in Drew Bledsoe was a shocker.
Not to mention the complete lack of explaining why we need a true deep threat WR or why we have two possesion WR we are about to break the bank on.
Russ Smith said:My problem was saying it made sense to not take a QB in a year there was one sitting there we liked (Ben) for a WR in a year stacked with WR's with the NEXT draft coming in also fairly deep in WR's, but quite possibly not deep at all in QB's.
If you know there's 4-5 QB's next year draft or FA sure take Fitz, if you don't, you're now stuck because Leinart and Rodgers say they're not coming out, and if they do, we probably won't pick high enough to get them, without having to trade a core player to get them.
We had a great draft but I'd rather be looking for a WR than a QB.
Bledsoe? Yeah, I could see that. I don't know how I'd feel about it, but I could see it happening. He's certianly a step above McCown and King, and Navarre actually looks a lot like a young Bledsoe, so maybe we'd have a second QB coach on our hands in tutoring Navarre.conraddobler said:Some good points but ending with bringing in Drew Bledsoe was a shocker.
Not to mention the complete lack of explaining why we need a true deep threat WR or why we have two possesion WR we are about to break the bank on.
Skkorpion said:I'm glad we finally got to it. McCown will be someplace else next year.
I hope King succeeds because McCown is now past history with Denny Green.
King should have had more reps in practice and Green admitted that this morning. So drop the McCown hpes, they are finished.
cheesebeef said:On the one hand I'll say Hallelujah because I think Josh just flat out sucks and willnever be anything more than Stoney Case in this league - but on the other hand - WE DIDN'T DRAFT BIG BEN BECAUSE GREEN LIKES SHAWN KING?! I've been on board with everything else at this point with Denny, but this is a REAL head scratcher to me. Hopefully Denny goes out and rpvoes the skeptics (part of me) wrong again, but if that truly was his decision making process and he really wanted King overall, well, call me stumped.
Skkorpion said:My opinion differs a bit from Ed's but the end result is the same.
When Shaun King got to start, he was given more shotgun plays and more deep patterns wre called. McCown had a more limited package to work with. I think Denny Green had planned all along to go to Shaun King sometime his season but couldn't do it earlier because King had a horrible series of camps.
King is Denny Green's choice, not McCown. Statements to the contrary were nonsense. And McCown and King knew it all along and never interracted. They avoided each other. Couldn't stand each other.
The real audition for QB is now. Denny Green liked King coming out of college and the next 6 games will tell us if King can play. I'm glad we finally got to it. McCown will be someplace else next year.
I hope King succeeds because McCown is now past history with Denny Green.
King should have had more reps in practice and Green admitted that this morning. So drop the McCown hpes, they are finished.
I thought the oline actually pass blocked well yesterday but King was holding the ball too long. Rust? Probably. Give him a chance.
Above all, we need aa real RB. Then our QB will have a chance.
Skkorpion said:My opinion differs a bit from Ed's but the end result is the same.
When Shaun King got to start, he was given more shotgun plays and more deep patterns wre called. McCown had a more limited package to work with. I think Denny Green had planned all along to go to Shaun King sometime his season but couldn't do it earlier because King had a horrible series of camps.
King is Denny Green's choice, not McCown. Statements to the contrary were nonsense. And McCown and King knew it all along and never interracted. They avoided each other. Couldn't stand each other.
The real audition for QB is now. Denny Green liked King coming out of college and the next 6 games will tell us if King can play. I'm glad we finally got to it. McCown will be someplace else next year.
I hope King succeeds because McCown is now past history with Denny Green.
King should have had more reps in practice and Green admitted that this morning. So drop the McCown hpes, they are finished.
I thought the oline actually pass blocked well yesterday but King was holding the ball too long. Rust? Probably. Give him a chance.
Above all, we need aa real RB. Then our QB will have a chance.
conraddobler said:I
Fitz better be awesome cause Denny isn't through working out the reprecusssions of that one yet.
Skkorpion said:My opinion differs a bit from Ed's but the end result is the same.
When Shaun King got to start, he was given more shotgun plays and more deep patterns wre called. McCown had a more limited package to work with. I think Denny Green had planned all along to go to Shaun King sometime his season but couldn't do it earlier because King had a horrible series of camps.
King is Denny Green's choice, not McCown. Statements to the contrary were nonsense. And McCown and King knew it all along and never interracted. They avoided each other. Couldn't stand each other.
The real audition for QB is now. Denny Green liked King coming out of college and the next 6 games will tell us if King can play. I'm glad we finally got to it. McCown will be someplace else next year.
I hope King succeeds because McCown is now past history with Denny Green.
King should have had more reps in practice and Green admitted that this morning. So drop the McCown hpes, they are finished.
I thought the oline actually pass blocked well yesterday but King was holding the ball too long. Rust? Probably. Give him a chance.
Above all, we need aa real RB. Then our QB will have a chance.
I think this is probably accurate and is closer to what I said back in training camp. Green's view of King is a lot closer to my view then the rest of you.Skkorpion said:My opinion differs a bit from Ed's but the end result is the same.
When Shaun King got to start, he was given more shotgun plays and more deep patterns wre called. McCown had a more limited package to work with. I think Denny Green had planned all along to go to Shaun King sometime his season but couldn't do it earlier because King had a horrible series of camps.
King is Denny Green's choice, not McCown. Statements to the contrary were nonsense. And McCown and King knew it all along and never interracted. They avoided each other. Couldn't stand each other.
The real audition for QB is now. Denny Green liked King coming out of college and the next 6 games will tell us if King can play. I'm glad we finally got to it. McCown will be someplace else next year.
I hope King succeeds because McCown is now past history with Denny Green.
King should have had more reps in practice and Green admitted that this morning. So drop the McCown hpes, they are finished.
I thought the oline actually pass blocked well yesterday but King was holding the ball too long. Rust? Probably. Give him a chance.
Above all, we need aa real RB. Then our QB will have a chance.
This_Guy said:I think this is probably accurate and is closer to what I said back in training camp. Green's view of King is a lot closer to my view then the rest of you.
Yesterday was a bad day for King just as it was a bad day for the entire team. Many of King's mistakes were the quickly correctable kind, like not being in synch with WRs because he's been taking his reps with Reggie Newhouse all year. McCown's mistakes were not correctable, like not seeing the field, not having pocket presence, etc. Those of you clamoring for McCown are funny. McCown had absolutely everything working around him and still could not make the passing game work, King had absolutely nothing working around him, including the officiating, yet still moved the ball despite being blitzed constantly. (I still find it incredibly amusing that "at least McCown didn't turn the ball over". How many INTs did McCown get called back due to penalties? Multiple? Did he have any 44 yard TD passes called back? I don't think so)
King's turnovers were inexcusable, but the team was down 14-0 before King threw his first INT and the TD to Boldin was a 14 point swing. Those of you calling King a "turnover machine" aren't going off of anything besides yesterday. King hasn't turned the ball over historically, and the Panthers forced FIVE turnovers from Tim Rattay last week. I suspect McCown would have had more problems yesterday than King and would have been benched anyway. If King turns the ball over next week, it's fine to get all upset. But do not confuse a bad game with a bad player. If 343 yards is a bad game, guess what happens when there is a good game?
Everyone take a deep breath, King is the QB for at least another week and almost assuredly the rest of the season. Since most of you felt that McCown needed a FULL SEASON to be judged, give King ONE WEEK of practice to be fair. King will shake off the rust, play much better and now that there is a passing game to go with the Cardinals defense, they are a much more complete football team for the rest of the year.
Yesterday was miserable for the whole team, move on.
WildBB said:The only thing King's got going for him is good WR's! That's it.
Russ Smith said:That was the whole point of taking Fitz over a QB though right? If we did, we wouldn't need a franchise QB, that was Denny's whole plan.
This_Guy said:I think this is probably accurate and is closer to what I said back in training camp. Green's view of King is a lot closer to my view then the rest of you.
Yesterday was a bad day for King just as it was a bad day for the entire team. Many of King's mistakes were the quickly correctable kind, like not being in synch with WRs because he's been taking his reps with Reggie Newhouse all year. McCown's mistakes were not correctable, like not seeing the field, not having pocket presence, etc. Those of you clamoring for McCown are funny. McCown had absolutely everything working around him and still could not make the passing game work, King had absolutely nothing working around him, including the officiating, yet still moved the ball despite being blitzed constantly. (I still find it incredibly amusing that "at least McCown didn't turn the ball over". How many INTs did McCown get called back due to penalties? Multiple? Did he have any 44 yard TD passes called back? I don't think so)
King's turnovers were inexcusable, but the team was down 14-0 before King threw his first INT and the TD to Boldin was a 14 point swing. Those of you calling King a "turnover machine" aren't going off of anything besides yesterday. King hasn't turned the ball over historically, and the Panthers forced FIVE turnovers from Tim Rattay last week. I suspect McCown would have had more problems yesterday than King and would have been benched anyway. If King turns the ball over next week, it's fine to get all upset. But do not confuse a bad game with a bad player. If 343 yards is a bad game, guess what happens when there is a good game?
Everyone take a deep breath, King is the QB for at least another week and almost assuredly the rest of the season. Since most of you felt that McCown needed a FULL SEASON to be judged, give King ONE WEEK of practice to be fair. King will shake off the rust, play much better and now that there is a passing game to go with the Cardinals defense, they are a much more complete football team for the rest of the year.
Yesterday was miserable for the whole team, move on.