As one of Stantons biggest critics...

SoCal Cardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 11, 2004
Posts
6,056
Reaction score
1,296
I'm proud of him, I felt like he did all you can expect out of your backup..... He missed on some deep balls... But he had several catchable balls dropped IMO.

He's gone to his second read more times in the last two games, then I can recall in all his previous snaps as a Card.

The play-calling remains atrocious.... We finally run a good screen, then abandon it??
The Wilson "chuck and duck" was the game changer IMO... I really thought it would be a pick when he released it. :/
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,279
Reaction score
6,223
Location
Dallas, TX
He's tuuuuurible! Dont sugarcoat it any other way. Wasn't he like 11-25 when it was money around the 12 min mark of the 4th?

Don't let the drops fool you, Stanton left lots of yardage on the field tonight before that point. His career 55% career completion says he's not very good.
 

azsouthendzone

ASFN Addict
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Posts
5,620
Reaction score
1,322
He was awful. Terrible accuracy. Not in every case but the guys look like they are worried they are going to die trying to catch balls over the middle. Post game show Wofley was saying some garbage about how the Cardinals have to do this and that because of Stanton, run Peterson a million times ect....but that Stanton is such a tough guy or whatever. How about you put Gabbert in, throw the damn ball, and see what he has? Can't be worse. Absolutely cannot be worse than Drew. That was painful to watch.
 

Shaggy

Site Owner Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Posts
9,048
Reaction score
2,989
Location
Arizona
Love to see a stat of how many catchable drops there were compared to his bad passes.
 

Big D

...and STILL...
Joined
Dec 9, 2004
Posts
817
Reaction score
381
Location
Chandler
One of the best backs in NFL history fumbling from midfield on the very first play from scrimmage doesn't exactly help a back up QB. That play set the tone.
 

bojack

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 28, 2015
Posts
1,134
Reaction score
516
I concur... I am the biggest Stanton hater and wanted him gone for the last few years, if nothing else because he was not the future, he could not carry us through a season if CP got hurt (which was always quite probable given his age and history) and his space on the roster was costing us the opportunity to find our next QB.

Stanton normally plays terrible like he did in London, but these 2 starts I would say have not been a big drop off from CP's play this year. That isn't saying much since CP has played pretty poor more often than not, but Stanton is playing above my expectations. Does this mean he will be able to get us to the playoffs, no way, but we have enough life that there is a sliver of hope that we could win a game here and there.

Still, this doesn't change anything. BA screwed us by not planning ahead knowing CP was going to be retiring and injury prone. We should had a young QB in grooming on the bench since the 2015 season, if not sooner. No excuse for that, but from BA's perspective it wasn't going to be his problem by then so he would run the org like a charity for his friends people.

BA is loving that Stanton didn't totally crap the bed instead of having the goal to have a QB that plays lights out. Why you ask? BA is 100% comfortable with mediocrity and will accept it. He has a commitment to mediocrity because he has commitment to players and staff that are mediocre instead of having a commitment to winning and doing the best. If you can't see that by now you must not be paying attention all these years.

I can't wait for this season to be over and enjoy the process of rebuilding with new life. It might not be pretty but we'll be able to look forward to the future. Right now we're living in the past and there is nothing to hope for with BA and team going forward.
 

azsouthendzone

ASFN Addict
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Posts
5,620
Reaction score
1,322
Love to see a stat of how many catchable drops there were compared to his bad passes.
Do they have a stat for how many plays that could be passes become vanilla run plays because we don't want our QB to pass a lot? How about a stat for how many pass plays that should go down field turn into dink and dunk plays instead because the QB can't make plays down field? Can't win consistently with the guy. They beat a winless team with Stanton. WINLESS. That's about all he has. Seattle handed this game over but we literally could not take it
 

Shaggy

Site Owner Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Posts
9,048
Reaction score
2,989
Location
Arizona
Do they have a stat for how many plays that could be passes become vanilla run plays because we don't want our QB to pass a lot? How about a stat for how many pass plays that should go down field turn into dink and dunk plays instead because the QB can't make plays down field? Can't win consistently with the guy. They beat a winless team with Stanton. WINLESS. That's about all he has. Seattle handed this game over but we literally could not take it

I'm not saying he's our future, but this loss is not on him. Several players caused this loss and I don't think Stanton was one of them. Could he have won it if he didn't over throw a few deep balls, hell yea, but he didn't lose this game.
 

cardinals

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Posts
130
Reaction score
42
He’s a career 50% passer.

what part of- he hit his receivers multiple times but they dropped the ball- do you not understand?
how lacking in critical thought do you have to be to not see that?
they have a week and a half off and are only 3-5.
this is highly likely

You must be registered for see images attach
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,467
Reaction score
18,369
Location
The Giant Toaster
Evaluating his performances are irrelevant and a waste of time. Yes the receivers were absolute crap but Stanton is what he is and it's the same thing every week.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,563
Reaction score
25,562
The drops were killers.

Those and the bonehead Kerwynn Williams catching the ball inside the 5 twice, we just made it too easy for them.
 
OP
OP
S

SoCal Cardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 11, 2004
Posts
6,056
Reaction score
1,296
I thought I was the biggest Stanton critic here... I stand corrected.

I'm nowhere near wanting him to be our QBOTF, but he exceeded my expectations tonight, but alas..... I had the bar set pretty low.

Having a future HOF RB drop the rock.... And then Ellington fumble without contact didn't help matters.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,451
Reaction score
7,405
Location
Chandler
Not a chance. The guy is terrible. Sure there were drops, but he is clearly not supposed to be on a roster.

Who would you prefer as your back up QB? Don't know of any with a 60% or higher completion percentage. Do you want Carolinas back up? Maybe Houstons?
 

clif

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Posts
8,967
Reaction score
214
Location
Phoenix, az
Who would you prefer as your back up QB? Don't know of any with a 60% or higher completion percentage. Do you want Carolinas back up? Maybe Houstons?
This is why you draft a qb. We should have drafted someone. Someone waiting in the wings. Not some lame as 33 year old lamppost every damn year.
 

StreetTruckinTitan

You talkin' to me?
Joined
Mar 11, 2014
Posts
3,210
Reaction score
1,813
Stantons throws were either to high or to low at the feet of his recievers. Other throws were good but a few were also nicely defended because of the placement of where DS puts the ball. Too many were into double coverage. He's lucky he wasnt picked multi times last night.
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
27,182
Reaction score
35,670
Location
BirdGangThing
Maybe some of the drops were because Stanton is erratic, the receivers were caught off guard that they didn't have to jumo or dive.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
 

clif

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Posts
8,967
Reaction score
214
Location
Phoenix, az
what part of- he hit his receivers multiple times but they dropped the ball- do you not understand?
how lacking in critical thought do you have to be to not see that?
they have a week and a half off and are only 3-5.
this is highly likely

You must be registered for see images attach


Listen. I don’t know you nor do you know me. So let’s keep it civil. Everyone recognizes there were drops and bad route running. It still doesn’t take away from the fact that Stanton missed some guys really badly. Hell he threw one deep ball 10 yards out of bounds. He is very inconsistent and at times flat out terrible. We’ve seen this for years and yet somehow he is still on this roster. This is borderline criminal.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
20,798
Reaction score
14,744
Location
Chandler, Az
Listen. I don’t know you nor do you know me. So let’s keep it civil. Everyone recognizes there were drops and bad route running. It still doesn’t take away from the fact that Stanton missed some guys really badly. Hell he threw one deep ball 10 yards out of bounds. He is very inconsistent and at times flat out terrible. We’ve seen this for years and yet somehow he is still on this roster. This is borderline criminal.

I disagree 100%. Yes Stanton had a few bad balls. However as a second string QB he did everything you need from your backup. He protected the ball and gave the team a chance to win. I have zero problems with how Stanton played last night. He wasn't the reason the team lost.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
553,686
Posts
5,410,706
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top