At least someone likes Warner

NFL_FAN

NFL_FAN
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
423
Reaction score
0
Location
Tempe
In spite of all the negative talk I have heard on radio and read here, John Clayton thinks highly of the pick up, gave it 4 footballs which equates to a highly positive move:

John Clayton's analysis:
The move: The Cardinals sign QB Kurt Warner to a one-year deal.

The upside: Instead of six touchdown passes last season, Warner could have had 17 if his receivers could break a tackle or two. Warner brings experience and accomplishment to Dennis Green's offense. He completed 62.8 percent of his passes with the Giants and got the team off to a surprise 5-2 start. After back-to-back losses, he was benched, but he has better blocking and better receivers with the Cardinals.

The downside: He's not mobile. Giants coach Tom Coughlin tired of the increasing number of sacks. Warner had 39 sacks in nine games. He can't escape many rushes and is willing to stay in the pocket to complete a pass. Sometimes those negative plays can come back to haunt an offense.

Clayton's take: This was a great signing from the standpoint that Warner and Green each have a track record of winning. Warner now has a big, physical offensive line, particularly with the addition of right tackle Oliver Ross. If the Cardinals can get a few more players on defense, they might be a factor in the NFC West.
 

Osbern61

Insomniac
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Posts
3,577
Reaction score
559
Location
Philadelphia
I like Clayton's take accept for the last sentence. I assumed, as bad as the NFC West is, that we area factor right now!
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
NFL_FAN said:
In spite of all the negative talk I have heard on radio and read here, John Clayton thinks highly of the pick up, gave it 4 footballs which equates to a highly positive move:

John Clayton's analysis:
The move: The Cardinals sign QB Kurt Warner to a one-year deal.

The upside: Instead of six touchdown passes last season, Warner could have had 17 if his receivers could break a tackle or two. Warner brings experience and accomplishment to Dennis Green's offense. He completed 62.8 percent of his passes with the Giants and got the team off to a surprise 5-2 start. After back-to-back losses, he was benched, but he has better blocking and better receivers with the Cardinals.

The downside: He's not mobile. Giants coach Tom Coughlin tired of the increasing number of sacks. Warner had 39 sacks in nine games. He can't escape many rushes and is willing to stay in the pocket to complete a pass. Sometimes those negative plays can come back to haunt an offense.

Clayton's take: This was a great signing from the standpoint that Warner and Green each have a track record of winning. Warner now has a big, physical offensive line, particularly with the addition of right tackle Oliver Ross. If the Cardinals can get a few more players on defense, they might be a factor in the NFC West.

Add to that a running game which is necessary for a QB to have any success.
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
Osbern61 said:
I like Clayton's take accept for the last sentence. I assumed, as bad as the NFC West is, that we area factor right now!

I think the NFC West was clearly the doormat of the NFL last year. That is just the facts of the situation. Nothing to get angry about. Just hope they are as bad this year.
 

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,507
Reaction score
5,785
Location
Scarsdale, NY
The West

Did get two teams into the playoffs, last year. Why are "we" worse than the NFC East? They have one VG team and three mediocre to bad teams.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,050
Posts
5,431,304
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top