Bickley Column

Treesquid PhD

Pardon my Engrish
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Posts
4,844
Reaction score
105
Location
Gilbert
Suns aren't broken but have heart trouble


The Suns are no longer a running, stunning wonder to behold. On some nights, they're not even the best team in the Pacific Division. When the calendar turns to 2008, let's hope this diminished group can find a keener sense of purpose.

Otherwise, a memorable era of basketball could end in a first-round playoff ouster. Planet Orange could spontaneously combust.

Please, don't bother with the rationalizations, the pretty pictures and how the Suns rank among the Western Conference leaders in victories. That condition will get even better in the coming weeks, as the schedule softens. But you won't find this problem in the standings: It's in the heart.
It's inside the room. It's in the small things that lead to big things. It's in the collective passion of a group that is showing some natural wear and tear, along with the trademark signs of splintering.

The Suns aren't broken. But they're not right, either.

"I don't think it's great," Suns coach Mike D'Antoni said of his team's general state of being. "It is what it is. What you look for is what you get. But I do think we're better than what the perception is right now."

Alas, in terms of perception, this team has already fallen a long way. After a Christmas Day loss on national television, one NBA analyst said the Lakers had passed the Suns, and it wasn't even close. The other night, team broadcaster Dan Majerle called the Suns the "worst rebounding team in the league." These are not the words you normally hear on the way to a championship, and the general angst among Suns fans is that a special gift and a special opportunity may be slipping away.

There has been front-office bungling, to be sure. Contracts given to the underachieving Boris Diaw and Marcus Banks have choked the franchise at a tenuous time. The pawning of draft picks has prevented an infusion of fresh talent, while the cost-effective trade of Kurt Thomas hurts more than it should. Meanwhile, all the grumbling about chemistry problems this season surely has led to some heavy questions at the management table.

Should they acquire another new piece, a fresh face to charge the room? Should they trade away a key piece and hope for addition by subtraction? Should they ditch D'Antoni's system and begin feeding the ball to an unstoppable force - Amaré Stoudemire - who makes almost 59 percent of his shots?

For most of this season, Stoudemire has ranked just above Grant Hill for third place in field-goal attempts, behind reserve Leandro Barbosa and Shawn Marion. Given Stoudemire's skills, that's beyond an egregious tactical error. That's plain stupid. After Saturday's abbreviated practice, D'Antoni hinted that there could be some alterations to the overall approach.

"I like my system, but only if that's the best system we have," D'Antoni said. "If we have something better, we'll try other stuff. Whatever is our best look is what we're going to give. You do have more holes (in the current system) because you are playing faster, you are exposed more, you are smaller and you have to have more fight in the dog. But it's kind of sad when you have to go away from that because you can't get it (from the players)."

That's a remarkable concession, and the shame is, it doesn't have to be this way. When committed to nothing but collective glory, this team can be a devastating force of talent and speed. With the right mix and mind-set of players, D'Antoni's system can be visionary, not inherently flawed. But in the NBA, all it takes is one guy who wants more shots or one guy who wants out of town, and everything is out of balance.

Luckily, a new year can change one's outlook immensely, and I suggest that: Steve Nash go out of his way to get Stoudemire the ball early and often, as in 20 or more shots per game; that Raja Bell be the gritty, dirty emotional leader, not the guy worrying about his shot and helping Kobe Bryant off the floor; that Stoudemire hustle at all times, actually playing defense as well as he talks about playing defense; that Marion stays on board when he doesn't get named to the All-Star team; that everyone understands the great gift of playing with a point guard like Nash.

Also: That Barbosa drives more and shoots less; that the painfully passive Diaw understands how much his coach has done for him and what the Frenchman has done in return. (Back home, I believe the word is guillotine.)

But more than anything, I want these Suns to pretend they love each other all over again. I want them to believe they're something special together, a blowtorch of a team that once made opponents scream for oxygen and mercy. Those were the days.




I pretty much agree with him 100%
 

YouJustGotSUNSD

Custom User Title!
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Posts
5,168
Reaction score
0
For most of this season, Stoudemire has ranked just above Grant Hill for third place in field-goal attempts, behind reserve Leandro Barbosa and Shawn Marion. Given Stoudemire's skills, that's beyond an egregious tactical error. That's plain stupid.

FEED AMARE!!!!
 

az1965

Love Games!
Joined
Jan 23, 2003
Posts
14,760
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin, TX
That's a great article. Bickley has been writing some good stuff lately, right on target!
 

arwillan

The King
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Posts
2,952
Reaction score
0
tonight would be a very good night to feed the beast.
 

Greg Popovich

Registered
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Posts
236
Reaction score
0
Way over reaction.

Columnists are paid to get readers and can be provocative when necessary.

If he is saying that the Suns are not consistent--then the same is true for SA, the Mavs...just about every other team that will be in contention in the playoffs. (Ok--Celtics have great record, largely against Eastern teams, though).

Still I predict a re-match in WCF between Suns and the Spurs to go to the 7th game.
 

arwillan

The King
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Posts
2,952
Reaction score
0
Way over reaction.

Columnists are paid to get readers and can be provocative when necessary.

If he is saying that the Suns are not consistent--then the same is true for SA, the Mavs...just about every other team that will be in contention in the playoffs. (Ok--Celtics have great record, largely against Eastern teams, though).

Still I predict a re-match in WCF between Suns and the Spurs to go to the 7th game.


by his standards, it appears that every team in sports other than maybe the patriots is inconsistent because they lose at times. I wouldn't be so fast to say the celtics are all that "consistent" either. i mean they lost to 3 good teams, but nearly all of their wins are against teams that they SHOULD dominate. To me, there is no real consistency shown when a teams consistently beats worse teams.

Sa-Phx in the WCF is my call too. 7 games would be a rollercoaster
 

az1965

Love Games!
Joined
Jan 23, 2003
Posts
14,760
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin, TX
Way over reaction.

Columnists are paid to get readers and can be provocative when necessary.

If he is saying that the Suns are not consistent--then the same is true for SA, the Mavs...just about every other team that will be in contention in the playoffs. (Ok--Celtics have great record, largely against Eastern teams, though).

Still I predict a re-match in WCF between Suns and the Spurs to go to the 7th game.
Do you even have a slightest idea what he is trying to say because it does not seem that way???

He is not saying the team is not winning consistently, even though that is a problem by itself. He is saying Amare is being wasted in this system which absolutely true.
 

dodie53

A. O. II
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Posts
6,320
Reaction score
2
Location
Tondo, Manila
Way over reaction.

Columnists are paid to get readers and can be provocative when necessary.

If he is saying that the Suns are not consistent--then the same is true for SA, the Mavs...just about every other team that will be in contention in the playoffs. (Ok--Celtics have great record, largely against Eastern teams, though).

Still I predict a re-match in WCF between Suns and the Spurs to go to the 7th game.

just stick to coaching ok?
:)
 

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
"I don't think it's great," Suns coach Mike D'Antoni said of his team's general state of being. "It is what it is. What you look for is what you get..."
'Sounds like Dennis Green's "They are what we thought they were."

Look where it got him. :thud:

Mike D'Antoni is like the people who invented the hula hoop, the pet rock, etc. They made alot of money while the gimmick was hot. Then what? Back to mediocrity.

Yes, our record is good during the regular season. But he could not live up to the expectation of Eyes On The Prize. His thinking seems to be very short sighted.

If the best he can say is, "It is what it is. What you look for is what you get.", his days are numbered.

Better get packed for Italy, Mike. You're an icon there. :notworthy
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
121,116
Reaction score
61,646
'Sounds like Dennis Green's "They are what we thought they were."

Look where it got him. :thud:

Mike D'Antoni is like the people who invented the hula hoop, the pet rock, etc. They made alot of money while the gimmick was hot. Then what? Back to mediocrity.

Yes, our record is good during the regular season. But he could not live up to the expectation of Eyes On The Prize. His thinking seems to be very short sighted.

If the best he can say is, "It is what it is. What you look for is what you get.", his days are numbered.

Better get packed for Italy, Mike. You're an icon there. :notworthy

I don't know how you can compare D'Antoni versus Dennis Green other than perhaps a similar statement. Green was a loser in Phoenix. The previous three seasons with D'Antoni as the Suns coach have been outstanding short of a Championship. Although the Suns may not be in top form, they are very close to the top in the Western Conference the last time I looked. Perhaps some fans would be happier if the Suns hired Frank Johnson or Scott Skiles back. I do think the Suns have a way to go to improve their rebounding and defense and I'm hoping for a trade to shore up this area of the game.
 

YouJustGotSUNSD

Custom User Title!
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Posts
5,168
Reaction score
0
I listen to Bickley and MJ in the morning and read his articles often, and I agree with him more often than not.

Does he overexaggerate? yeah, but his point is valid.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
121,116
Reaction score
61,646
I just don't like Bickley because he likes pouring salt in a wound too much. If Amare keeps playing this well he will make the decision for D'Antoni. Amare is just playing too dominant to ignore.
 

Rab

Angry Vedder
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Posts
1,539
Reaction score
225
Location
In My Tree
Luckily, a new year can change one's outlook immensely, and I suggest that: Steve Nash go out of his way to get Stoudemire the ball early and often, as in 20 or more shots per game; that Raja Bell be the gritty, dirty emotional leader, not the guy worrying about his shot and helping Kobe Bryant off the floor; that Stoudemire hustle at all times, actually playing defense as well as he talks about playing defense; that Marion stays on board when he doesn't get named to the All-Star team; that everyone understands the great gift of playing with a point guard like Nash.

This was the part of the article I like a lot. I'm usually not a huge Bick fan, but I think in general, he nailed this one. Sure, they are still a great team, but there are the classic signs of the end. It really reminds me of the Kings of 3-4 years ago. Still had their core, but it just wasn't good enough anymore, and eventually, Webber was gone, and they started over again.

You just don't see much emotion from this team anymore. You see a lot of negative emotion and body language on the court, but you don't always see the team support each other like they have in years past.

Maybe this team just doesn't care right now. Maybe they are tired of a failing system. Maybe they are hurting more than we know. Maybe there is more division in the locker room than we think. Maybe DA is being tuned out a little. Who knows?

There could be so many reasons why this team just hasn't been the Suns we are used to. Let's just hope that Bick's optimism of a new year bringing in new attitude is on the money.
 

scXfreakX

Huh?
Joined
Jul 26, 2007
Posts
573
Reaction score
0
Location
Valley of the Sun
I agree with him. Who cares if he's exaggerating or not? The fact is that we don't seem to have that same passion and fire as past years. I mean, forget the score. It just seems that guys aren't as focused. Maybe they are? But, it seems to me, and many other Suns fans, that they are not. For whatever reason. Or maybe its that other teams have figured out how to stop us. Then we've got to adapt. Whatever the case, beating up injured and lesser teams is fun and all, but, this team better be ready come playoff time.
 

Ronin

Captain obvious
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
148,176
Reaction score
69,747
Location
Crowley, TX
I think D'antoni got the message after the Laker loss. Amare has scored 89 points in the three games since then.

I do agree with Bickley though that this team needs to play with some passion.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
121,116
Reaction score
61,646
I think D'antoni got the message after the Laker loss. Amare has scored 89 points in the three games since then.

I do agree with Bickley though that this team needs to play with some passion.

I agree the Suns need to play with more passion. I did not need Bickley to tell me that. However, I'm not sure D'antoni has changed his system to the feed Amare system as yet.

In a separate article by Bob Young at The Arizona Republic written on 12-28-07 the following was noted:

Not by design

D'Antoni said there was no intent in Stoudemire winding up with the ball at the end of the Suns' first five possessions Thursday night against the Clippers in Los Angeles.

"We don't do that," he said. "The ball finds energy, and the ball finds the guy who's rolling, and he was rolling."

See Link:

http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns/articles/1228sunsnb1229.html

For the Suns sake, I hope Amare keeps rolling or D'Antoni stays open to changing his system for the best system. I would like the Suns to feed Amare more when he is on the court but continue with the spread offense especially when Amare is off the court. I see no reason why the two approaches cannot work together. Just let Steve decide as he has in the past couple of games.
 
Last edited:

Ronin

Captain obvious
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
148,176
Reaction score
69,747
Location
Crowley, TX
I agree the Suns need to play with more passion. I did not need Bickley to tell me that. However, I'm not sure D'antoni has changed his system to the feed Amare system as yet.

In a separate article by Bob Young at The Arizona Republic written on 12-28-07 the following was noted:

Not by design

D'Antoni said there was no intent in Stoudemire winding up with the ball at the end of the Suns' first five possessions Thursday night against the Clippers in Los Angeles.

"We don't do that," he said. "The ball finds energy, and the ball finds the guy who's rolling, and he was rolling."

See Link:

http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns/articles/1228sunsnb1229.html

For the Suns sake, I hope Amare keeps rolling or D'Antoni stays open to changing his system for the best system. I would like the Suns to feed Amare more when he is on the court but continue with the spread offense especially when Amare is off the court. I see no reason why the two approaches cannot work together. Just let Steve decide as he has in the past couple of games.
[FONT=&quot]I think that D’antoni and Steve Nash will figure it out. [/FONT] Personally, I don’t mind who gets the shot as long as it comes within the flow of the game.
 
Top