- Joined
- Oct 29, 2006
- Posts
- 6
- Reaction score
- 0
This was a great, great editorial by Dan Bickley.
Kent Somers, whose recent articles tend to resemble dictation for Bidwill and Leinart, doesn't have much credibility. He is attempting a balancing act of maintaining access with those who control the access (the cards' organization) and being objective at the same time.
Lately, though, he just comes across as a Bidwill organization lapdog.
Bickley is not covering the Cards as a beat writer, so he's free to write as he sees fit. And he's free to use his pen to defend the best interests of the fans (winning) against the best interests of the Bidwills (slick "face of the franchise" marketing schemes, etc.).
Thank God we have Bickley going to bat for us fans -- and not afraid to stand up to an organization that has shown so little interest in putting a winner on the field for us -- but has put a high level of interest in taking our money.
Kent Somers, whose recent articles tend to resemble dictation for Bidwill and Leinart, doesn't have much credibility. He is attempting a balancing act of maintaining access with those who control the access (the cards' organization) and being objective at the same time.
Lately, though, he just comes across as a Bidwill organization lapdog.
Bickley is not covering the Cards as a beat writer, so he's free to write as he sees fit. And he's free to use his pen to defend the best interests of the fans (winning) against the best interests of the Bidwills (slick "face of the franchise" marketing schemes, etc.).
Thank God we have Bickley going to bat for us fans -- and not afraid to stand up to an organization that has shown so little interest in putting a winner on the field for us -- but has put a high level of interest in taking our money.