Bryant statements focus of hearing

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
Orange County Register

Monday, February 2, 2004
Bryant statements focus of hearing
His lawyers will argue today that detectives illegally obtained his July 2 comments.

By MARCIA C. SMITH
The Orange County Register


EAGLE, COLO. – Nearly seven months ago, two Eagle County Sheriff's Office detectives approached Kobe Bryant in the parking lot of the exclusive mountainside resort where he was a guest and began questioning him about an alleged sexual assault.

Today, as the Lakers guard returns for another pretrial motions hearing at the Eagle County Justice Center, the conduct of local investigators during Bryant's 90-minute police interview in the early morning hours of July 2 will come into question.

Bryant, 25, of Newport Coast has been charged with the June 30 sexual assault of a 19-year-old Eagle woman at the Lodge and Spa at Cordillera, where he was a guest and she worked as a front-desk agent. He says he had consensual sex with the woman.

Bryant's attorneys, Pamela Mackey and Hal Haddon, are scheduled to begin arguments today to keep what Bryant said to police - and the two white T-shirts investigators collected as a result of Bryant's statements - from being used in court as evidence against him.

Defense lawyers claim Bryant's statements were illegally obtained by detectives who exercised "unlawful conduct" and violated several of Bryant's constitutional rights.

In a 30-page defense motion filed Dec. 12, Bryant's attorneys detailed what they consider police misconduct, beginning with the moment detectives Doug Winters and Daniel Loya encountered Bryant outside the Edwards resort just after midnight.

Bryant, who was recovering from arthroscopic right knee surgery seven hours earlier in Vail, was on crutches when police separated him from his two security guards.

Detectives asked to be taken to Bryant's hotel room, where the assault allegedly occurred. Bryant "expressed reluctance" but "detectives insisted," and police interviewed Bryant from about 1:30 a.m. to 3 a.m., the court filing said.

According to his lawyers, police never read Bryant his Miranda rights prior to questioning, violating his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent as protection from self-incrimination.

The defense also maintains that police violated Bryant's Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable search and seizure by interrogating him at night without judicial authority and in his hotel, where he has the expectation of privacy.

The filing says Bryant was not informed that the detectives possessed a search warrant and a court order to take him to an area hospital for a male sexual assault examination.

Loya also surreptitiously activated a recorder in his shirt pocket to record 75 minutes of Bryant's statements, the filing said.

Testimony and evidence regarding Bryant's statements from the time he was approached by police to his placement around 3 a.m. in a police vehicle for transport to Valley View Hospital 50 miles west in Glenwood Springs will be heard in a closed courtroom, by order of Fifth Judicial District Court Judge Terry Ruckriegle.

Haddon last week pushed for the suppression hearing to be closed because Bryant had disclosed some "intensely personal" and clearly irrelevant details to police that could prejudice potential jurors, especially if his comments are deemed inadmissible at trial.

But the issue of whether police followed proper procedure will be held in open court, where the local prosecution team will bear the heavy burden of proving Bryant was neither interrogated or in custody when his statements were taken.
 
OP
OP
George O'Brien

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
This article suggests that a key part of the prosecution case may get thrown out on procedural grounds. Let's face it, this is a small town police department that usually can get away with being sloppy because they are not up against $500 an hour lawyers.

The problem with all this is that Kobe will go free, but not vindicated.
 

frdbtr

Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2003
Posts
407
Reaction score
1
Originally posted by George O'Brien
This article suggests that a key part of the prosecution case may get thrown out on procedural grounds. Let's face it, this is a small town police department that usually can get away with being sloppy because they are not up against $500 an hour lawyers.

The problem with all this is that Kobe will go free, but not vindicated.

I think that the only way that Kobe would be "vindicated" is if the woman accusing him of Rape made a statement that she was not raped and that she only accused Kobe of raping her to extort money out of him. I don't see that happening. Kobe will probably win this case but this is going to haunt him for the rest of his career/life just like OJ.
 

Travis Bickle

Newbie
Joined
Oct 22, 2003
Posts
35
Reaction score
0
Location
Nogales
This is nothing like OJ, yet. We know OJ did it. If Kobe is acquitted--and I think he will be--I think most people will give him the benefit of the doubt.
 
OP
OP
George O'Brien

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
Originally posted by Travis Bickle
This is nothing like OJ, yet. We know OJ did it. If Kobe is acquitted--and I think he will be--I think most people will give him the benefit of the doubt.

I'm not so sure. Unless Kobe's defense team can prove she made it up, I think he will carry the stigma for a long time. Obviously teams like the Nets with Griffin will ignore even blatant crimes.

But the Colgangelos have not been inclined to take people with a bad reputation, no matter how talented. (Look at how explicit they are about having no interest in Sheed Wallace). I may be wrong, but I don't think just getting off because the police violated his 4th amendment rights may not be enough fo the Colangelos.

Anyway, Kobe is likely to decide that waiting until 2005 would give people more time to forget the case.
 
Top