Arz101
ASFN Lifer
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2014
- Posts
- 4,906
- Reaction score
- 5,600
Budda 100% getting released next year.
+1
Budda 100% getting released next year.
It may have been part of the negotiation. Cards got Budda to buy in for 1 more year, knowing they'd let him be a FA next year.Budda 100% getting released next year.
If that’s the case, why not just trade him to another team and actually get something of value as opposed to letting another talented guy walk in for absolutely nothing?It may have been part of the negotiation. Cards got Budda to buy in for 1 more year, knowing they'd let him be a FA next year.
He would have given Budda a 5 year extension with 90% of the money deferred for another 5 years after that, continuing to hamstring the team's salary cap.Don't praise MO for making this basic move.
I 1000% guarantee you Steve "prime time" Keim would have also shored up BB's contract and would have kept BB's status from being an issue for all of the season.
Good-time-Stevie was a master at managing player's contracts!
$3.75 dead money in 2024Any dead money if we cut him next year?
If the plan truly is to release him next year, why would they not just accelerate all this to this year’s cap instead of contiuining to create dead money for next year?$3.75 dead money in 2024
Budda Baker | NFL | Spotrac.com
Budda Baker contract and salary cap details, full contract breakdowns, salaries, signing bonus, roster bonus, dead money, and valuations.www.spotrac.com
You can't accelerate money that's already been paid. The $3.775 million if/when he's released next year is what's already been paid on his before-today deal. Maybe that number goes up a little, but it won't be a ton.If the plan truly is to release him next year, why would they not just accelerate all this to this year’s cap instead of contiuining to create dead money for next year?
GotchaYou can't accelerate money that's already been paid. The $3.775 million if/when he's released next year is what's already been paid on his before-today deal. Maybe that number goes up a little, but it won't be a ton.
Even less if they stretch it.
Oh, I said as much today as I was ordering the new jersey. I would LOVE to get a Budda 3 but I believe he's good as gone. What's Jalen's contract status? LOL.Budda 100% getting released next year.
Not the Cardinals way it seems.If that’s the case, why not just trade him to another team and actually get something of value as opposed to letting another talented guy walk in for absolutely nothing?
Very good questionQuestion for those that think he is overpaid.
What do you think he should have been paid?
Great job by MO to create incentives based on actually being available. It’s a new era in Cardinal football. It may take a couple years to reap benefits from a W/L perspective, but you have to start somewhere when you’re trying to establish a sustainable culture.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Maybe if Simmons shows some ability at S, you'll keep him instead with the money already invested in Thompson at S?Why would they release him next year? Because of his salary? Why not extend him next year? He'll be 28 in 2024. I would like to extend him for a couple of more years. Like JG said he plays the game the way it should be played.
Hopefully if that is the case, they trade him and not release him. He doesn't seem the type to sit out as he is at camp now. If he stays healthy and produces, we should get good value in return.Maybe if Simmons shows some ability at S, you'll keep him instead with the money already invested in Thompson at S?
Simmons will be a free agent after this season.Maybe if Simmons shows some ability at S, you'll keep him instead with the money already invested in Thompson at S?
Yeah - we'll play him out of position until his last season, then he'll have a breakout year and sign elsewhere. The Cardinal way?Simmons will be a free agent after this season.
You would think they could get away with paying Simmons half of what they pay Budda if he performs enough to earn a 2nd contract.Yeah - we'll play him out of position until his last season, then he'll have a breakout year and sign elsewhere. The Cardinal way?
What I was expressing was that theoretically, since we've invested in Thompson as well, the Cards might make a decision between paying Budda again as one of the highest paid players at his position, perhaps you instead pay Simmons. (assuming he can actually play at S)