Ouchie-Z-Clown
I'm better than Mulli!
GREAT example.I also want to point out that this was what people were saying when Detroit drafted Megatron. You have spent multiple high picks on WRs already why do it again?
GREAT example.I also want to point out that this was what people were saying when Detroit drafted Megatron. You have spent multiple high picks on WRs already why do it again?
Man, I had recalled the three straight picks but never put together megatron was just two drafts later. Good lord.Lions:
2003 Charles Rogers Pick #2
2004 Roy Williams Pick #7
2005 Mike Williams Pick #10
2007 Megatron Pick #2
Prior mistakes should not stop you from taking elite talent.
Well if they were you they’d not have drafted megatron. So where it got them is a better place than your strategy of allowing sunk costs to dictate future actions.lol and where did that get them? Matt Millen got fired a year later, after going 0-16. I'll pass on replicating that.
They ended up getting nowhere with Megatron... so, doesn't really matter. If they had focused on being a balanced team or getting rid of Matt Millen earlier after going to the same well with failed results, maybe they'd have gotten something out of Stafford.Well if they were you they’d not have drafted megatron. So where it got them is a better place than your strategy of allowing sunk costs to dictate future actions.
They ended up getting nowhere with Megatron... so, doesn't really matter. If they had focused on being a balanced team or getting rid of Matt Millen earlier after going to the same well with failed results, maybe they'd have gotten something out of Stafford.
Its not freaking Pokemon. We don't need to collect them all.
There's MORE than enough talent on this offense outside of TE.
Seems there are some that won't be happy until we have four WR1's and a CMC clone at RB.
What are you on about? I won’t be happy until we have a offense that can play each element consistently well. As well as a D that can do the same... but right now you have to go with your young QB... ergo offense first
SameIs it weird I want Freiermuth in round 2 more than I care who we draft in round ?
They needed a wr. Your route would have been, “well we tried a bunch of times, so no more trying. We will just suck at wr.” Verses eventually filling that need. Did they suck? Yeah, but not bc they eventually found the wr they needed.They ended up getting nowhere with Megatron... so, doesn't really matter. If they had focused on being a balanced team or getting rid of Matt Millen earlier after going to the same well with failed results, maybe they'd have gotten something out of Stafford.
So when we drafted Rosen and it was a flop would should’ve just given up on qb. Got it.I know right. We should do what Detroit did! (Checks record through that period)
5-11
6-10
5-11
3-13
7-9
0-16
2-14
6-10
10-6 (lost wildcard round)
4-12
7-9
11-5 (lost wildcard round)
7-9
In that whole period from when the first 1st rounder was drafted to Megatron retiring they had 2 winning seasons in 13 years and lost in the wildcard both times.
Lets do that!
They needed a wr. Your route would have been, “well we tried a bunch of times, so no more trying. We will just suck at wr.” Verses eventually filling that need. Did they suck? Yeah, but not bc they eventually found the wr they needed.
Someone help me, I don’t even know how to respond to this statement.Ultimately what did Megatron do for them if he couldn't help the Lions win?
What if the Lions took Joe Thomas or Revis? Or ever Adrian Peterson?
Megatron did absolutely nothing to make them better as a team so do you call that a success?
Someone help me, I don’t even know how to respond to this statement.
It’s a terrible statement because you have to have more than a single player to succeed. I mean, it’s a REALLY bad take. You could say the same about Fitz I guess turning a blind eye to bad coaches, bad front office, bad talent, for the majority of his seasons.Have you seen their record? I means I just put it right there.
You draft players to make you better. The measurement of "better" is wins.
The Lions suuuuucked for practically his whole time in Detroit.
Superb player no doubt. But how did that help Detroit be better?
They needed a wr. Your route would have been, “well we tried a bunch of times, so no more trying. We will just suck at wr.” Verses eventually filling that need. Did they suck? Yeah, but not bc they eventually found the wr they needed.
It’s a terrible statement because you have to have more than a single player to succeed. I mean, it’s a REALLY bad take. You could say the same about Fitz I guess turning a blind eye to bad coaches, bad front office, bad talent, for the majority of his seasons.
Yep the sunk cost fallacy. People threw around this same concept for keeping Rosen.
Wide receivers are so important in today's NFL. You can try to ignore it, but if you are a QB centric team, it will cost you later.
But you can’t build balance if you just move on to another position because you’ve still failed in the last effort.That's exactly my point.
It takes more than one player to succeed. And drafting the same position over and over again meant Detroit didn't have those players. So ultimately even when they did land on "the guy" it made no difference whatsoever.
The answer is not to keep spending capital on offensive skill players. The answer is to build a balanced team.
And without him that number likely is 4-5.They are so important that when they found one of the best ever they won 8 games the next 3 years.