Krangodnzr
Captain of Team Conner
Andrew Luck isn't a great pure passer yet, but he's among the top 10 or 12 quarterbacks in the NFL because of the whole package he delivers.
I would argue any where between top five and top three....
Andrew Luck isn't a great pure passer yet, but he's among the top 10 or 12 quarterbacks in the NFL because of the whole package he delivers.
Come on ...dude had NO O line protection. Every game I saw him in he was running for his life. He didn't have anywhere near the 3 seconds needed. It was SNAP...O NO RUNNNNNNN!! It was if Levi Brown was playing LT, LG, C, RG, and RT.
I would argue any where between top five and top three....
. I think you could talk me into Tony Romo if I'm drunk.
Not really. He beat out Matt Ryan and Drew Brees to win his second consecutive NFC South title--I think the first time a team has gone back-to-back championships in that division in history. His top receiver is his tight end, and none of his wideouts would have started on any other team in his division.
You can make a legit argument that Cam Newton might be a Bottom 10 passer in the NFL, but he'd definitely start for at least half of the teams in the NFL.
Including ours.
Meh, the team won the division, not Cam. That is like saying he is better than those other two QBs, no way I could agree with that in any form.
What part of the team? Their 16th-ranked defense? Jonathan Stewart's 8 starts? Newton was able to do more with less talent in the same division with a Top 5 QB and a Top 12 QB. That's something.
Come on ...dude had NO O line protection. Every game I saw him in he was running for his life. He didn't have anywhere near the 3 seconds needed. It was SNAP...O NO RUNNNNNNN!! It was if Levi Brown was playing LT, LG, C, RG, and RT.
FTR--Cam was 5-8-1 as a starter last season.
Winning a soft division at 7-8-1 isn't exactly a feather in the cap. He's the third best QB in his division, and that's not even a discussion.
Not really. He beat out Matt Ryan and Drew Brees to win his second consecutive NFC South title--I think the first time a team has gone back-to-back championships in that division in history. His top receiver is his tight end, and none of his wideouts would have started on any other team in his division.
You can make a legit argument that Cam Newton might be a Bottom 10 passer in the NFL, but he'd definitely start for at least half of the teams in the NFL.
Including ours.
Talk about overspending for a QB. Wow! Cam isn't even on the same level as Ryan, Rivers, Cutler, Romo, E. Manning, etc. He will be making as much as Rodgers. The Carolina leadership are idiots.
Talk about overspending for a QB. Wow! Cam isn't even on the same level as Ryan, Rivers, Cutler, Romo, E. Manning, etc. He will be making as much as Rodgers. The Carolina leadership are idiots.
Puhlease..... Newton might not be Manning, Brady, Rodgers, Brees, Rothlisberger, however much younger and lots more potential.
But saying he is not even on the same level as the ones you mentioned ist just stupid.
You just keep trying to convince yourself of this. His stats haven't substantially gotten any better in any category over 4 years. When is he going to start reaching that potential? Huh?? All the QBs taken in 2011 are mediocre at best and then go downhill from there. Cam has improved just as much as Dalton which is not at all. Hell Ryan Tannehill has gotten better each and every year in almost every category while Cam has been stuck in neutral. You don't even want to compare Cam to Luck. So before you go saying someone's opinion is just stupid you ought to check your facts first. Got that Forest.
Sure, he sulks at times, a lot like Cutler if you ask me,
Cam is way better than Cutler and Eli. As good as Romo imo.
To be fair, Tannehill and Dalton have continually had talent added around them, while Newton had has his supporting cast systematically stripped away.
Ya'll be cray sometimes. I'd take Cam in a heartbeat, even over Palmer.
Name some QBs with less talent around him than Cam? And I don't just mean WRs, go up and down the team. Even if you merely limit it to offense, the cupboard is bare.
Sure, he sulks at times, a lot like Cutler if you ask me, but BA is a straight up type-A dominant, old school, man. You can't convincingly tell me he wouldn't groom this kid both in demeanor and mechanics. Some of you believed he could groom Stanton to win a playoff game--some people thought more than one. Cam has much more talent to work with. His floor is Stanton's absolute ceiling, on his best day.
And the issue with his running is ridiculous. When you have nobody to throw to and the play breaks down that's what happens. Furthermore, Palmer is a statue and has suffered debilitating injuries throughout his career. Sure, running is dangerous, but so is sitting in the pocket waiting for Ocho Cinco to get open 50 yards down field and having dudes crash around your knees. BA has coached big Ben and Andrew Luck, two QBs who also have a propensity to scramble when the play breaks down. It's not as if BA doesn't know how to work with what he has.
Cam would have a larger impact on this franchise than AP potentially would have over the next 10 years. I trust that BA could "fix" his issues over a 5-10 year period because there's simply much more to work with.
This current attitude toward Cam is why we never have nice things. We'd rather go with a dinosaur like Emmitt Smith or Dave Krieg or Boomer Esiason, and many many more.
With the right coaching, Cam Newton would turn this franchise around, long term.
This is precisely how I view Newton. A celebration of mediocrity.
Cam has had weapons around him in the past. Carolina's running game was near the top in the league with Williams and Stewart. (along with Cam) QB's best friend right? He also had Steve Smith and Greg Olsen as throwing targets. His cupboard wasn't completely bare.
And when he had that the threw for over 4000 yards, rushed for over 700 yards and scored 31 TDs combined passing and rushing.