Codeofhammurabi
Cards Fan Since 1971
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2004
- Posts
- 641
- Reaction score
- 0
Just a question.
Codeofhammurabi said:Just a question.
LVCARDFREAK said:It would be nice to have him and all, but I feel he would be under utilized here. Plus I am sure the Fins or someone else higher than the Cards fell in love with him at the combine. I am guessing he doesnt make it to #10.
Big Deal said:I would take Davis in a second! Who would you ever be able to double? Can you imagine what running lanes that would open up???? With Warner being the signal caller that he is I think it would be the right move. All you would have to do is be able to read a run or pass coverage, how could a team double or triple Fitz?
LVCARDFREAK said:It would be nice to have him and all, but I feel he would be under utilized here. Plus I am sure the Fins or someone else higher than the Cards fell in love with him at the combine. I am guessing he doesnt make it to #10.
BigDavis75 said:In response ot the original question, Davis is a very good blocker.
WildBB said:We don't need Vernon Davis at 10. There are other needs and we have enough weapons as of now. Bergen is a better blocker and an adaquate reciever. We could land a pretty good TE in the 2nd/3rd round if we wanted one, they are in abundance this yr.
Ouchie-Z-Clown said:bergen is a crappy blocker. period. i'm willing to bet, just based on vernon's physique and drive, that he'll quickly be a better blocker than bergen.
RugbyMuffin said:Take him
And address OL in 2nd round.