No, you just don't understand the grading.
They just asked players to rank each by letter grade, then compared it to all other teams.
It just means a lot of teams have very good strength coaches for example.
I understand this, just that it's weird most was A-B or F.
K9 highlighted that the ones we were rated high on were directed toward people they wouldn't likely put on blast. The rest weren't. (so there's a good chance that not all these guys are quite as highly rated).
I was trying to get at the weirdness/inaccuracies of human nature/emotion instilled in the poll, and thus the format of allowing such a report that almost guaranteed extremes.
It's still telling, and we all get what it means regarding Bidwill's, but I believe the structure of the NFLPA poll makes it look a little worse (overall) for teams.
Despite that, I'm sure it's a more accurate reflection of us than (generically) some other teams.
shocker:: we're cheap. Ugh.
But overall how cheap? Because in a sense, while the lower-rated aspects might be a bit too low, the things we were rated higher, might be a bit too high. So we still might effectively be overall lower rated than it states.