Worley would’ve caught him if they played on a 175 yard field.This must be to help Kirk's confidence!
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
But for Cardinals they are starters!!!!! LolThese are terrible signings even for final roster spots on a 90 member team.
I swear some of you just bash any move the Cardinals make.These are terrible signings even for final roster spots on a 90 member team.
I swear some of you just bash any move the Cardinals make.
Worley isn't a world beater, but has also had moments in his career where he has played pretty well. It took me 10 seconds on Google to figure that out, but you obviously aren't bothered by taking on that kind of rigor.
Those moments must be in college because he has been pretty atrocious in the NFL. The fact this is his 7th team in 5 years with 2 of them including atrocious Dallas & Vegas defenses last year says a lot.I swear some of you just bash any move the Cardinals make.
Worley isn't a world beater, but has also had moments in his career where he has played pretty well. It took me 10 seconds on Google to figure that out, but you obviously aren't bothered by taking on that kind of rigor.
Well GOOD he will get cut and all the bashers can say I told you soThose moments must be in college because he has been pretty atrocious in the NFL. The fact this is his 7th team in 5 years with 2 of them including atrocious Dallas & Vegas defenses last year says a lot.
Naw he had a stretch with the Raiders where he allowed a 60 something QB Rating.Those moments must be in college because he has been pretty atrocious in the NFL. The fact this is his 7th team in 5 years with 2 of them including atrocious Dallas & Vegas defenses last year says a lot.
What stretch was that lol. You sure the QB didn’t overthrow the WR after he was burning Worley?Naw he had a stretch with the Raiders where he allowed a 60 something QB Rating.
Like I said, not a world beater but he is young and has started.
What stretch was that lol. You sure the QB didn’t overthrow the WR after he was burning Worley?
He’s young & atrocious. He was on 3 different teams last year. That is wild & there’s no way you can spin the signing anything close to a positive or even neutral. He’s just purely a camp body though so I shouldn’t be too worried.
"he is about the 30th best available FA in the month of July."I have no idea what moments you are taking about. Worley's past 3 years has been terrible. And he is about the 30th best available FA in the month of July.
And Oh, you did not bother to lookup the OL guy as you likely know the truth already!
You must be registered for see images attach
I posted incorrectly. Worley actually ranks 44th in the list of FA rankings still available. 7th in best available CBs"he is about the 30th best available FA in the month of July."
What do you base that on? The list you attached is sorted alphabetically by team, not by a player rating of sorts.
What do you expect of a guy who's going to be the 4th/5th CB on the depth chart?
Worley is a decent signing for vet depth likely on a vet min deal. You think we are getting an All Pro for the 5th CB spot?
And you can't judge him on last year. That whole Dallas defense was in disarray.
He's not great but still only 26 and who's 5th CB is great on any team?
So they still released him, signed him back a year later, & released him again despite that article including a 4 game sample in 5 seasons. Eh.Raiders Would Be Wise to Re-Sign Daryl Worley Much Sooner Than Later - Raiders Beat
The Raiders don’t have a busy spring coming in terms of re-signing current players...www.raidersbeat.com
This board tends to react without doing any research.
If you don't think that Worley is an upgrade from guys like Kevin Peterson...
The Raiders didn't release him. He signed with the Cowboys as a free agent.So they still released him, signed him back a year later, & released him again despite that article including a 4 game sample in 5 seasons. Eh.
What exactly makes him an upgrade? Draft status?
Ummmm....if you think a number one corner is still available LOLThe point is Cardinals don't have a two #1s. Not even one #1 CB. Instead of finding another #1 or #2, why does this team another 4th or 5th?
Ummmm....if you think a number one corner is still available LOL
Plenty of good defenses don't have a true #1 corner.Should not you be LOL'ng at Keim who put this team in this place without #1 instead of me?
PFF ranks Cardinals as #12 line in NFL. Even it #12 is right, it is not good enough. Rams have a better DL and guess what they needed a #1 CB and went and made it happen with Ramsey no?Plenty of good defenses don't have a true #1 corner.
If the front seven is functioning at a high level, teams don't need a great corner.