Cards cut Hoyer.

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
The always unreliable Jason La Canfora [the guy who swore Geno Smith would be drafted in the top ten] claims 3 or 4 teams are interested.

I sort of believe him and suspect he won't be unemployed for long. He just won't be making $2-million.

I agree. After all Josh McCown has hung on in the NFL for 10 years.

Maybe the Cards needed room to bring back Matt Leinart. :p
 

wa52lz

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 25, 2009
Posts
2,268
Reaction score
1,459
He may have asked to be released.
They may have wanted to free up salary cap space to offset Karlos Dansby or make a run at Dwight Freeney.
They may like Ryan Lindley.
Who knows at this point?
Im saying here comes Freeney!
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
Damn now I wish we would have drafted a Matt Barkley, got Matt Scott as UDFA, or Tyler Wilson. DOnt want anything to do with Lindley.

Maybe they saw something they liked?
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
Both are terrible QBs imo

Why they tendered this guy a 2nd rounder is astonishing :bang:

huh? the only person who should question that tender is Hoyer. They paid him nothing and kept an asset when we had no idea what the QB future held. Now hes gone and its like it never happened to everyone outside of the Hoyer family.

This was actually a very smart move by Keim and FO. The only thing astonishing is that this is our Cardinals making smart moves consistently.
 

TRW

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jan 13, 2003
Posts
7,810
Reaction score
7,487
Location
Avondale, AZ
Both are terrible QBs imo

Why they tendered this guy a 2nd rounder is astonishing :bang:

Agree with you Bucky...one of the few questionable decisions this offseason to me. But, no loss I guess if none of the $2 mil was guaranteed or paid to him.
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
Agree with you Bucky...one of the few questionable decisions this offseason to me. But, no loss I guess if none of the $2 mil was guaranteed or paid to him.

Please enlighten me on why this was a questionable decision? Are you guys sure you know how RFA tenders work, specifically in this scenario?

I wish we would have drafted a 3rd QB if we didnt plan on keeping Hoyer but tendering Hoyer was unequivocally the right move at the time. When you don't know if you are getting Palmer, it makes sense to hedge your bets especially when you are a new HC and Hoyer was arguably the best QB remaining on the team.

It's okay to have opinions but you are gonna have to clarify them if they make no sense.
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
You see tendering someone at the 2nd round level it doesn't mean you think they area 2nd round talent, it means you are going to make a team give up a 2nd round pick to get him. It's like playing poker.

If they tendered him as a 7th rounder, a team may have signed him which would have been bad pre Carson Palmer. At that point the team would have rather kept Hoyer then cut him loose for a 7th rounder. In hindsight things are different but had we not traded for Palmer, you better damn well believe the team would have paid him the 2m to be the backup.

Again this was a smart move. And now that they have Palmer it cost them nothing. Like I said the only ones who should be questioning this is the Hoyer family and his agent.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
You see tendering someone at the 2nd round level it doesn't mean you think they area 2nd round talent, it means you are going to make a team give up a 2nd round pick to get him. It's like playing poker.

If they tendered him as a 7th rounder, a team may have signed him which would have been bad pre Carson Palmer. At that point the team would have rather kept Hoyer then cut him loose for a 7th rounder. In hindsight things are different but had we not traded for Palmer, you better damn well believe the team would have paid him the 2m to be the backup.

Again this was a smart move. And now that they have Palmer it cost them nothing. Like I said the only ones who should be questioning this is the Hoyer family and his agent.

Too true. It was just the Cards purchasing an insurance policy with a fully refundable premium.

Just makes you shake your head though that every QB brought in by the greatest coach in Cardinal history except Lindley has been cut. Not traded. Not retired. Not lost to another team via free agency. Just shown the door.

Brian St.Pierre, DeWreck Anderson, Max Hall, John Skelton, Kevin Kolb, and Brian Hoyer. 6 QBs signed and released in only three seasons 5 of them starters at one time or another. If you add in Matt Leinart that's 6 QBs the Cards have let go in the last 3 years who had started games for them.

You gotta love Cardinal football.
 

TRW

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jan 13, 2003
Posts
7,810
Reaction score
7,487
Location
Avondale, AZ
Please enlighten me on why this was a questionable decision? Are you guys sure you know how RFA tenders work, specifically in this scenario?

I wish we would have drafted a 3rd QB if we didnt plan on keeping Hoyer but tendering Hoyer was unequivocally the right move at the time. When you don't know if you are getting Palmer, it makes sense to hedge your bets especially when you are a new HC and Hoyer was arguably the best QB remaining on the team.

It's okay to have opinions but you are gonna have to clarify them if they make no sense.

Hoyer is, simply put, a terrible bet to "hedge" anything on, IMO. That's all. Being arguably the best QB remaining on the team means nothing, again IMO.

But, since it cost nothing to keep nothing for a while it is really a moot point. Guess we all see things a little differently.

My take on any QB that took a snap last season should not be on the team this upcoming season. Last year was the most horrible QB play I have seen on any level in a long, long time.

You and Jake have differing views and that's what makes it all fun.
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
63,122
Reaction score
28,337
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
The way the off season has been going I was under the assumption that he was worth a late round pick. Hopefully we go shopping during camp and pick up someone besides Lindley who is just terrible.
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,060
Reaction score
3,324
I went on record saying that Hoyer wasn't going to get us much if anything via trade. Pats cut him and the Steelers who were rumored to like him also cut him. I have no problem with the Cards tendering him with 2nd rd value, especially since they have now cut him and aren't paying him 2 mil. A long shot bet that ultimately didn't cost them anything.

All this Lindley hate needs to be calmed down some IMWO. I rookie 6th rd pick thrust into a horrible situation does not define what Lindley can become. Yes he sucked but expecting much more of him was unrealistic.

I think he has earned a chance to have a 2nd training camp and wouldn't be shocked if he improves. I would be pleasantly suprised if he ever gets a start in the NFL again but his future isn't written in stone.
 

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
The odd thing is why have they kept Lindley who was beyond horrible last season while cutting Kolb, Skelton, and Hoyer who were all better?

Kolb was a salary cap liability who could never stay healthy while Skelton was badly exposed and shown that he wasn't as good as some may have thought.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
Kolb was a salary cap liability who could never stay healthy while Skelton was badly exposed and shown that he wasn't as good as some may have thought.

More all about pay and less about play. When you operate that way you go 5-11 every year.
 

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,493
Reaction score
5,739
Location
Scarsdale, NY
I'm pretty sure we cut Hoyer early, knowing that we we're not going to keep him as our third QB, so that he could hook on with another team. Well as we know the Browns wanted him, and now with David Garrard retiring, I'm reading that the Jets are looking for a vet QB. And are finding that the pickings are slim. Would that have meant a bidding war with a 6th or 7th round pick involved? Or, in the long run, does it benefit the team as FA's see Arizona as a destination, because they treat their players fairly?
 

machgman

Veteran
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Posts
162
Reaction score
0
Hoyer did look better than Lindley, but not two million better.

Besides, it looks like Keim wants to see if Lindley can produce a miracle for BA by suddenly producing accurate passes better than his college career average of 55%. Sure Lindley throws a beautiful pass that has a little pop when it gets there. Unfortunately when it gets there, it usually gets there to a defensive player.

BA is NOT going to make the same stupid and idiotic mistake that Whisenhunt did when Whisenhunt thought that a beautifully passed football equaled accuracy and that a QB with a college career completion average of 55% could magically morph into a NFL passer with a completion average over 62% just because he was in your stilted QB development program that ruined Leinart, Hall, and Skelton.

I hear Lindley seems to be a nice guy, but unless he can show significant and marked improvement on his accuracy AND decision making, Lindley will soon hear from the Turk and end up following Hoyer out the door.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,420
Reaction score
57,621
I'm extremely vague on how comp picks work, but would cutting a player like Hoyer potentially result in receiving one since another team has picked him up?

I've always hated comp picks because the Cardinals seemingly never get any. :D
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,363
Reaction score
29,723
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I'm extremely vague on how comp picks work, but would cutting a player like Hoyer potentially result in receiving one since another team has picked him up?

I've always hated comp picks because the Cardinals seemingly never get any. :D

Nope. Because he's a released player.

The Hoyer choice really doesn't have as much to do with Lindley as it does to do with Carson Palmer. Palmer is going to have to learn an entirely new offense, and getting that on point in time for Week 1 requires reps.

The new structure of OTAs makes it really difficult to get 3 QBs quality reps and coaching. Stanton got extra reps last season because Andrew Luck couldn't attend minicamps because of Stanford's graduation date. This year, we have a full complement of camp arms.

As I've said many times, if you're on your third QB, any team in the NFL is screwed. You can stash someone there for a year or maybe two on the way to developing him into a backup, but when Stanton signed, and the Cards traded for Palmer, Hoyer was done.
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
8,880
Reaction score
4,794
Location
Iowa
Nope. Because he's a released player.

The Hoyer choice really doesn't have as much to do with Lindley as it does to do with Carson Palmer. Palmer is going to have to learn an entirely new offense, and getting that on point in time for Week 1 requires reps.

The new structure of OTAs makes it really difficult to get 3 QBs quality reps and coaching. Stanton got extra reps last season because Andrew Luck couldn't attend minicamps because of Stanford's graduation date. This year, we have a full complement of camp arms.

As I've said many times, if you're on your third QB, any team in the NFL is screwed. You can stash someone there for a year or maybe two on the way to developing him into a backup, but when Stanton signed, and the Cards traded for Palmer, Hoyer was done.

Unless you're the 1966 Baltimore Colts who rode halfback turned emergency QB Tom Matte to success in the NFL Playoff game against Dallas after the Unitas & Gary Cuozzo got hurt.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1078093/index.htm
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
552,807
Posts
5,403,027
Members
6,313
Latest member
50 year card fan
Top