Cards Pre-Draft Preview for FF Board

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
19
Location
The Aventine
Hey guys,

Since I'm one of the only Cardinals' followers on a FF board I frequent, I'm working on an pre-draft preview and positional analysis for a thread that will include all 32 teams. Can you look at what I've got so far (the offensive side of the ball) and give me some feedback?

Thanks,

Pariah

P.S.--I'm thinking of adding "The" to my handle. I feel like I've graduated from the ranks of an everyday Pariah to become "The Pariah." What do you think? Am I Pariah-y enough for you?

ARIZONA CARDINALS

I think the organization believes they have less holes to fill than the average NFL fan thinks they do. Their most glaring need is help on the defensive line, specifically the pass rush. After that they could use an impact WR and another DB.

If Terrell Suggs, Terrence Newman or a top-DT isn’t there for the Cardinals at #6, don’t be surprised to see them trade down with one of the teams with multiple #1 selections.

Here’s the breakdown by position:

QUARTERBACK
For those of you who have been living under a rock: Jake Plummer is the starting QB for the Broncos. Most of Cardinals Nation (a country roughly the size of Luxemburg), this is a blessing, and constitutes addition by subtraction. Good luck, Denver.

The Cardinals have publicly stated that their QB of the future is already with the team. His name is Josh McCown. However, they signed Jeff Blake in the off-season to start this season; presumably because McCown didn’t see the field much last year—even in the face of numerous blowouts. Personally, that makes me a bit suspicious.

But, if the Cardinals don’t take Leftwich (or Palmer, if he falls to them) in the first round, don’t look for Arizona to draft a signal caller before the 3rd or 4th round, if at all. If it turns out McCown isn’t their man, there are plenty of QBs to choose from next year.

RUNNING BACK
What a mess. Thomas Jones is as good as gone. Marcell Shipp showed promise last year, but has been supplanted as the starter by Emmitt Smith. The Cardinals also have a promising young kid from Kansas State on the bench in Josh Scobey (who was injured all of last season); Damien Anderson did a fine job of coming off the practice squad to gain over 100 yards in his first start for an injured Shipp/Jones, and then the Cardinals also signed Travis Prentice. Also in this off season, the Cardinals signed FB James Hodgins from the Rams to block for Smith/Shipp and let FA FB Joel Mackovika walk.

I don’t see the Cardinals using a draft pick on a RB unless in the unlikely event McGahee falls to the third round, then it may be too tempting to pass up.

WIDE RECEIVER
Letting David Boston walk away without ANY compensation — Biggest blunder in football…EVAH. As I write this, Frank Sanders is a FA and in negotiations with Baltimore. That leaves us with Jason McAddley, Bryan Gilmore, Kevin Kasper and a few more young, unproven guys thrown in for good measure. The Cardinals may add a name or two after June 1 via free agency; names that have been bandied about are Mushin Muhammad, Marcus Robinson or Tony Martin.

WR is a pressing need for the Cardinals, but they already have a dearth of young pass catchers, most who have been graded out in the past as potential starting material. If the Cardinals believe they can get a FA starter at the position after June 1, I would be surprised to see then use anything higher than a third round pick on the position. If they use a first or second rounder on a WR, then I believe they are prepared to go into the season with the youthful corps they already have.

TIGHT END
You fantasy ballers are thinking Freddie Jones wasn’t getting looks last year. You’re wrong. He was the leading receiver on the Cardinals in 2002. Tywan Mitchell and Steve Bush back him up. All three are good receivers and Bush is an excellent blocker, sometimes used as a FB.

I don’t see any reason why the Cardinals would use a first-day pick on a TE.

OFFENSIVE LINE
Leonard Davis, LJ Shelton, Pete Kendall, Anthony Clement…who am I missing? Oh, yeah, the center. This is a formidable group, even with former center backup, Jason Starkey, getting his first full season of starts. Last year they were literally riddled with injury, so there may be a late OL pick to add some depth, but they’re shaping up nicely once again. The only first day possibility might be for an impact center — if someone like Jeff Faine falls to them in the second he’d be hard to pass up, particularly if the defensive players they had their sights on are off the board.
 

BW52

Registered
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
5,043
Reaction score
1,904
Location
crestwood,Ky
Tywan Mitchell TE was cut in August.Mike Banks replaced him.Banks is known as a mean hustling blocker and special teamer with average hands.
 

jf-08

chohan
Administrator
Super Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,273
Reaction score
24,461
Location
Eye in the Sky
Very good analysis/break down for FF. However, Tywan did not play last year - Banks, Jones and Bush were the 3 headed monster. Banks only played in 1 game - the Denver game & didn't cath a pass.
 
OP
OP
Pariah

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
19
Location
The Aventine
I knew that. I don't know why I regressed to 2001. Thanks for the catch!
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,064
Reaction score
31,431
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I'm sorry, I'm a former English major:

Doesn't "dearth" mean "lack"? We have plenty of "un-tested" (one of my favorite NFL euphemisms). I would even say that we had a surfeit of them. Who has graded them out in the past as future starting material?

That's all I got.
 

Shane

My time of year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
70,144
Reaction score
41,522
Location
Las Vegas
Also Anderson did not rush for over 100 yards not even close. he had about 66 yards on some 20+ carries if I remember correctly!
 

jf-08

chohan
Administrator
Super Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,273
Reaction score
24,461
Location
Eye in the Sky
Originally posted by Shane H
Also Anderson did not rush for over 100 yards not even close. he had about 66 yards on some 20+ carries if I remember correctly!

Correct, somewhat:

Carries: 24
Rush Yards: 65

Recepts: 3
Rec Yards: 36

Total yards: 101

So he did actually GAIN over 100 yards in that game.
 
OP
OP
Pariah

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
19
Location
The Aventine
Originally posted by kerouac9
I'm sorry, I'm a former English major:

Doesn't "dearth" mean "lack"? We have plenty of "un-tested" (one of my favorite NFL euphemisms). I would even say that we had a surfeit of them. Who has graded them out in the past as future starting material?

That's all I got.

Don't apologize--that's why I posted it.

"Dearth" does mean "lack." My bad.

I think I can see where you're going with the unproven vs. untested thing and I agree "untested" is a better description--but I don't think there's a hyphen in there.

McAddley and Gilmore last year were talked about as starting material by draft analysts. I don't know who off the top of my head, but thankfully, this isn't a term paper and I won't need to cite sourses.

Thanks!:thumbup:
 

jf-08

chohan
Administrator
Super Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,273
Reaction score
24,461
Location
Eye in the Sky
Originally posted by jkf296
Correct, somewhat:

Carries: 24
Rush Yards: 65

Recepts: 3
Rec Yards: 36

Total yards: 101

So he did actually GAIN over 100 yards in that game.

AARGH! He only gained 61 yards on the ground that game. He also had 4 yds against Oakland.

So the totals above are for the season.

For his 1st start vs Carolina he had 61 + 36 = 97.

Vs Oakland he had 4 yds rush & 0 rec.
 

Shane

My time of year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
70,144
Reaction score
41,522
Location
Las Vegas
Originally posted by jkf296
Correct, somewhat:

Carries: 24
Rush Yards: 65

Recepts: 3
Rec Yards: 36

Total yards: 101

So he did actually GAIN over 100 yards in that game.

Technically he did gain over 100 in that sense. But when you typically refer to a RB gaining over 100 yards it is infered that it was on the ground only.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,064
Reaction score
31,431
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Originally posted by Pariah
Don't apologize--that's why I posted it.

"Dearth" does mean "lack." My bad.

I think I can see where you're going with the unproven vs. untested thing and I agree "untested" is a better description--but I don't think there's a hyphen in there.

McAddley and Gilmore last year were talked about as starting material by draft analysts. I don't know who off the top of my head, but thankfully, this isn't a term paper and I won't need to cite sourses.

Thanks!:thumbup:

Actually, I meant "untested" being a euphanism for "bad." It might not be true, but it's usually what the pundits mean. "The Cards Running Backs, behind Thomas Jones, are largely untested going into the 2002 season. Perhaps they should get a free agent veteran (euphanism for "good") backup before the start of the season".
 

BW52

Registered
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
5,043
Reaction score
1,904
Location
crestwood,Ky
Originally posted by jkf296
Very good analysis/break down for FF. However, Tywan did not play last year - Banks, Jones and Bush were the 3 headed monster. Banks only played in 1 game - the Denver game & didn't cath a pass.


Mike Banks played in 12 games last season.not active or DNP in week 1 vs Wash,week 3 vs SD,week 16 vs SF,Week 17 vs Denver.
:thumbup:
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,547
Reaction score
34,628
Location
Charlotte, NC
Another minor error Pariah (hey you're not a Pariah!) Frank Garcia is our starter at center right now. Other than that a few small errors, great job!
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
559,934
Posts
5,468,542
Members
6,338
Latest member
61_Shasta
Top