Cards say offers for trade down are picking up

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,470
Location
Charlotte, NC
Trice is my “stay away” guy too and I can’t quite put my finger on why.
Below average athlete and way smaller than he was listed in college. He looks like a JAG to me.

He doesn't really have a single special trait and he was pretty bad against the run in college too.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,470
Location
Charlotte, NC
You must be registered for see images attach


Here is a trade scenario where the Cardinals work out a three team trade.

Minnesota trades the Cardinals 11, 27, and a 2025 1st. The Cardinals trade 11 and 27 for 5 and 69.

The Cardinals still get Harrison but also get an additional 1st and 3rd, and improve 27 to 23.

The Cardinals then trade up to get Latu.
 

gmabel830

It's football season!!
Joined
May 8, 2011
Posts
12,996
Reaction score
8,092
Location
Gilbert, Arizona
That would be amazing. You do that for pretty much anyone who’s not a franchise QB especially a WR
Unless we for sure have a deal to move back up to land who we want with #11 and #23, trading with MIN in a deal that includes #23 does very little for me given we have #27 and #35 and are likely to get guys in the same general grade/range with those picks. I don't advocate trading that far down, but I'd prefer #11 plus their next two 1st rounders instead of #11, #23, and next year's #1 unless all of the dominoes are firmly in place to get us back up to a spot to grab the WR the team likes best (or second best if it's pretty much the same grade).
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,419
Reaction score
29,823
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Unless we for sure have a deal to move back up to land who we want with #11 and #23, trading with MIN in a deal that includes #23 does very little for me given we have #27 and #35 and are likely to get guys in the same general grade/range with those picks. I don't advocate trading that far down, but I'd prefer #11 plus their next two 1st rounders instead of #11, #23, and next year's #1 unless all of the dominoes are firmly in place to get us back up to a spot to grab the WR the team likes best (or second best if it's pretty much the same grade).
I'd argue that the #23 overall in this draft is worth as much if not more than a first rounder two years from now.

Pushing first rounders into the future is the ultimate magic beans strategy.
 

Fitz4Ever

Veteran
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Posts
475
Reaction score
911
Location
Idaho
Id trade #4 for 3 1sts all day long. We should be able to trade up and grab Odunze or Nabers, and even if we dont, we would be able to beef up the lines to a point where we are a much improved team.

I think the top 3 WRs are really good, and I would prefer to get one....but if it doesnt work out...Im ok taking 2 guys in the first 3 rounds and hoping that one of them becomes a #1 WR. I will take massive upgrades to the O and D Line...plus 2 guys out of Coleman, Franklin, Legette, Pearsall, and Walker.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,474
Reaction score
18,383
Location
The Giant Toaster
I'd argue that the #23 overall in this draft is worth as much if not more than a first rounder two years from now.

Pushing first rounders into the future is the ultimate magic beans strategy.

That’s cause we have PTSD from the Texans success. Imagine if Stroud/Richardson went 1-2 and Carolina traded up with us for Young…
 

Forum statistics

Threads
553,932
Posts
5,412,706
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top