Cards say offers for trade down are picking up

[Dback Jon]

This is not real life. Just chad. Lighten up Frances.

Francis.

 

[Mulli]

Francis.

Frances - Baby name meaning, origin, and popularity

See the popularity of the baby name Frances over time, plus its meaning, origin, common sibling names, and more in BabyCentre's Baby Names tool.

www.babycentre.co.uk

 

[oaken1]

Frances - Baby name meaning, origin, and popularity

See the popularity of the baby name Frances over time, plus its meaning, origin, common sibling names, and more in BabyCentre's Baby Names tool.

www.babycentre.co.uk

ya see that .uk there at the end?

yeah, um...so those guys do it.......

 

[Mulli]

 

[SoonerLou]

He just wanted us to know @kerouac9

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

 

[kerouac9]

He just wanted us to know @kerouac9

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

LOL. I'd love to see the metrics on how many people watch 32 minutes of backwards hat talking to camera in a closet.

 

[oaken1]

He just wanted us to know @kerouac9

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

Holy poo ...that dude has the perfect face for radio

 

[kerouac9]

Imagine having to make one of those videos EVERY DAY? No thanks.

 

[SoonerLou]

Imagine having to make one of those videos EVERY DAY? No thanks.

A while back I was gonna suggest you and @Chopper0080 make a Cards pod.

 

[kerouac9]

A while back I was gonna suggest you and @Chopper0080 make a Cards pod.

Now that the revenue model has completely collapsed it feels like the right time.

 

[Chopper0080]

Now that the revenue model has completely collapsed it feels like the right time.

Nothing like buying high and selling low.

 

[Mulli]

Now that the revenue model has completely collapsed it feels like the right time.

Stamps.com.beyotch

 

[Ouchie-Z-Clown]

Id be ok with this move since I'm a pretty big Odunze fan. Not a fan of Trice or Nate Wiggins.

Trice is my “stay away” guy too and I can’t quite put my finger on why.

 

[Krangodnzr]

Trice is my “stay away” guy too and I can’t quite put my finger on why.

Below average athlete and way smaller than he was listed in college. He looks like a JAG to me.

He doesn't really have a single special trait and he was pretty bad against the run in college too.

 

[Krangodnzr]

You must be registered for see images attach

Here is a trade scenario where the Cardinals work out a three team trade.

Minnesota trades the Cardinals 11, 27, and a 2025 1st. The Cardinals trade 11 and 27 for 5 and 69.

The Cardinals still get Harrison but also get an additional 1st and 3rd, and improve 27 to 23.

The Cardinals then trade up to get Latu.

 

[Ronin]

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

 

[iLLmatiC]

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

I'm gonna be so pissed if we defer on Marvin for more first rounders.

 

[Finito]

I'm gonna be so pissed if we defer on Marvin for more first rounders.

That would be amazing. You do that for pretty much anyone who’s not a franchise QB especially a WR

 

[Shane]

I'm gonna be so pissed if we defer on Marvin for more first rounders.

I’m perfectly willing to defer on Marvin if a trade back up is in place to get Odunze. And still get a net gain in picks.

 

[Chopper0080]

That would be amazing. You do that for pretty much anyone who’s not a franchise QB especially a WR

I get what you are saying, but I don't believe we have that luxury after stripping down the roster of most of it's above average talent.

 

[gmabel830]

That would be amazing. You do that for pretty much anyone who’s not a franchise QB especially a WR

Unless we for sure have a deal to move back up to land who we want with #11 and #23, trading with MIN in a deal that includes #23 does very little for me given we have #27 and #35 and are likely to get guys in the same general grade/range with those picks. I don't advocate trading that far down, but I'd prefer #11 plus their next two 1st rounders instead of #11, #23, and next year's #1 unless all of the dominoes are firmly in place to get us back up to a spot to grab the WR the team likes best (or second best if it's pretty much the same grade).

 

[kerouac9]

Unless we for sure have a deal to move back up to land who we want with #11 and #23, trading with MIN in a deal that includes #23 does very little for me given we have #27 and #35 and are likely to get guys in the same general grade/range with those picks. I don't advocate trading that far down, but I'd prefer #11 plus their next two 1st rounders instead of #11, #23, and next year's #1 unless all of the dominoes are firmly in place to get us back up to a spot to grab the WR the team likes best (or second best if it's pretty much the same grade).

I'd argue that the #23 overall in this draft is worth as much if not more than a first rounder two years from now.

Pushing first rounders into the future is the ultimate magic beans strategy.

 

[Fitz4Ever]

Id trade #4 for 3 1sts all day long. We should be able to trade up and grab Odunze or Nabers, and even if we dont, we would be able to beef up the lines to a point where we are a much improved team.

I think the top 3 WRs are really good, and I would prefer to get one....but if it doesnt work out...Im ok taking 2 guys in the first 3 rounds and hoping that one of them becomes a #1 WR. I will take massive upgrades to the O and D Line...plus 2 guys out of Coleman, Franklin, Legette, Pearsall, and Walker.

 

[Mulli]

I'd argue that the #23 overall in this draft is worth as much if not more than a first rounder two years from now.

Pushing first rounders into the future is the ultimate magic beans strategy.

iTwOrkED 4 da BEARS!

 

[GatorAZ]

I'd argue that the #23 overall in this draft is worth as much if not more than a first rounder two years from now.

Pushing first rounders into the future is the ultimate magic beans strategy.

That’s cause we have PTSD from the Texans success. Imagine if Stroud/Richardson went 1-2 and Carolina traded up with us for Young…