Carmelo Anthony busted for DUI

shazaam6

Censor this
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Posts
1,126
Reaction score
4
When President Clinton signed the .08 law in 2000, every state was forced to either comply with the law or give up millions of dollars in federal highway money. Critics at the time pointed to numerous studies showing that motorists aren't significantly impaired at .08, and that in fact, most drunk driving fatalities occur at .15 or higher. Lowering the national standard from .10 to .08, then, was a bit like lowering the speed limit from 55 to 50 to catch motorists who zip along at 100 miles per hour

The D.C. Council was wise to scrap zero tolerance. And given the control Congress exerts over the District and the millions in federal dollars attached to it, it's probably unreasonable for the council to scrap its .08 standard, too. But even the Schwartz bill gives police officers discretion to arrest motorists between .05 and .079, a level of impairment studies show to be lower than having kids in the backseat. The council should correct this error.

In the larger picture, Congress should revisit its blanket .08 standard. The evidence so far suggests that the lower threshold is not only targeting motorists who aren't significantly impaired, it may well be making our roads more dangerous.

http://www2.potsdam.edu/hansondj/DrivingIssues/1133834173.html


If having kids in the backseat impairs motorists more than being at .08, ..........is .08 actually impaired?
 
Last edited:

Bufalay

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Posts
4,679
Reaction score
786
I don't really understand the .08 law. How am I supposed to tell what my BAC is? I've never driven after drinking at all since whether I feel drunk or not I don't know what my BAC is.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,132
Posts
5,433,728
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top