blindseyed
I'm saying you ARE stuck in Wichita
Got a text that the Ravens terminated his contract.....what do ya think?
Chris McAlister has been released by the Ravens.
http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/02/16/ravens-dump-mcalister/
I think he'd be a good veteran addition to our DB corps. He's big and physical and played at U of A. His bad knees have cost him some speed, but overall he'd be an upgrade over Rod Hood and Eric Green (assuming Green stays). He'll be 32 this June.
What do you guys think?
Hood excelled in the nickle in Philly, which is how he landed his deal with us as a starter. I like Chris McAlister but I agree that they need to show a true effort to extending the core before they hand out new money
NO NO AND NO.
I like Chris McAllister, he is still pretty good IMO, but he would get embarrassed on our current team IMO. He is also gonna want starter moneyt and he isn't worth that here IMO. I'd rather go after Dunta Robinson.
Whatever you say Champ. Sometimes you gotta pay the cost to be the Boss IMO.Do you know how much money Robinson will be seeking, Chris Gamble money. This isn't fantasy football
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/sports/6257321.html
Oh BTW, we're 40+ million under the cap (50 if you count losing Q, Edge and Chike). If you dont think we can afford a guy who is about the 7-10th best player at his position in this FA class you should stop posting so much and read more.
Arizona's cap room appeared as big as a rhino's yawn: $41 million, most in the league. With free agent studs Albert Haynesworth, Terrell Suggs and Julius Peppers ready to be wooed, the Cardinals seemed to have plenty of room to operate. Turns out, Arizona has only 41 players under contract, and when you re-punch the calculators, the functional cap space is $20-$25 million, less than the San Francisco 49ers. And, oh yeah, Cardinals safety Adrian Wilson and defensive tackle Darnell Dockett want raises, too.
Do you really want to take something from ESPN as truth? Gimme two minutes and I'll be right back.We have 41 players under contract, read this it explains it really well. We don't have as much cap space as you may think. This isn't Super Market Sweep where you can run down the store picking up your man crushes.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?id=3894167
Do you really want to take something from ESPN as truth? Gimme two minutes and I'll be right back.
We have 41 players under contract, read this it explains it really well. We don't have as much cap space as you may think. This isn't Super Market Sweep where you can run down the store picking up your man crushes.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?id=3894167
We have 41 players under contract, read this it explains it really well. We don't have as much cap space as you may think. This isn't Super Market Sweep where you can run down the store picking up your man crushes.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?id=3894167
41 players under contract. The remaining 12 aren't going to eat up 45-50 mill in cap space. You figure 6-7 of the spots are going to next years rookies and they will be on the cheap side.. That could go up to 9 rookies if Boldin(more cap space) gets dealt.Releasing Edge add 5+ mill more to the cap. That leaves 6-7 spots to fill out the roster. Two of those spots go to Warner and Dansby. Let's say they eat up a 17 mill cap hit.There is still going to be about 25+ mill left to sign new players and re-do AW and DD if they want.
Isn't he somewhat irrelevent though since cutting Edge and Chike (or restructuring Chike) will give us more back this year than Kurt will earn this year?One of those players is going to be Kurt Warner (probably) and I would assume a 2 year deal, probably 7-8 million dollar cap hit.... and that could be conservative
Ozzie Newsome is a good GM and knows when to dump players.
Remember when we threw big money at Db Starks, another Newsome dump-off? I do.