This.also, keep in mind that Vernon signed his deal last year, and contracts usually only get bigger the next year, especially when the cap continues to balloon the way it has this year.
This.also, keep in mind that Vernon signed his deal last year, and contracts usually only get bigger the next year, especially when the cap continues to balloon the way it has this year.
Of course not, I never said as much. I was referring to a specific post. C'mon Cheese.
Comparing Calais' importance to Big Dans is laughableCalais Campbell = Dan Williams
Immediately after losing him-
"Defense will not be as good"
"Can't replace his role on the team"
"Don't understand football if you don't see the importance of his contribution"
Etc, etc, etc...
Year later-
"Who?"
Way overpaid...I like Calais but I believe Chandler was the right one to pay. Only thing I'm really gonna miss is Calais big ass paw blocking kicks.
We haven't blocked a kick in a long time.
also, keep in mind that Vernon signed his deal last year, and contracts usually only get bigger the next year, especially when the cap continues to balloon the way it has this year.
We haven't blocked a kick in a long time.
Thanks for helping prove my point. By the way, their importance to the Cardinals will be EXACTLY the same this year.Comparing Calais' importance to Big Dans is laughable
So..Should we be in the FA or Draft market for a 6-7 295 lb interior lineman to fill the specialized role vacated by CC?
Or should we consider CC to be an irreplaceable freak of nature and return to a more traditional defensive front.
Are you seriously going to claim that "the Cardinals didn't get any discount", when the very source you quote says that they GOT a discount, albeit not much of one?!? THIS IS EXACTLY MY POINT!
Yes, it IS SIMPLE. The THREAT of a franchise tag is NOT as good as actually applying it. Otherwise every team with multiple big-name free agents-to-be could use the THREAT of the tag to leverage ALL of them. But that's not reality. Until the tag is ACTUALLY APPLIED, each of the players have MORE LEVERAGE. Once the tag is applied, the players have LESS leverage than if they were free agents, and ONLY THEN are willing to sign SLIGHTLY below-market deals. Below-market meaning, below what they would have signed on the FREE market as unrestricted free agents.
I've explained this ad-nauseam, but if you still don't get it, that's fine. I think everyone else reading this is tired of the discussion, so i'm out.
...dbs