82CardsGrad
7 x 70
No Alabama!!!!
My texas friends don’t like it. Wanted boise in second round.ASU getting 0 respect as the unveil the bracket. Basically crowning the winner of Texas v Clemson as getting easy opponent
I think Texas will beat ASU although I think Ewers is a pretty flawed QB. ASU got little pressure on ISU OL yesterday and Texas has a much better OL. I understand why they want Bose though and if I were a Texas fan I would have probably felt the same way.My texas friends don’t like it. Wanted boise in second round.
Absolutely that's what ESPiN is angling for. Also, they probably want a guarantee that Bama, Ohio State, UGA, USC, ND, and Texas will always be included regardless of record.Everyone notice ESPN laying the groundwork for doing away with conference champion byes and, instead, simply seeding the 12 participants?
Honestly, I’m not at all impressed by TexasI think Texas will beat ASU although I think Ewers is a pretty flawed QB. ASU got little pressure on ISU OL yesterday and Texas has a much better OL. I understand why they want Bose though and if I were a Texas fan I would have probably felt the same way.
Gotta root for Clemson again I suppose
Yes.Everyone notice ESPN laying the groundwork for doing away with conference champion byes and, instead, simply seeding the 12 participants?
They’re not talking about getting rid of the conference title games. They’re just saying those games shouldn’t determine the top 4.Everyone notice ESPN laying the groundwork for doing away with conference champion byes and, instead, simply seeding the 12 participants?
I never said ESPN mentioned the conference championship games just they are already floating conference champions not getting first round byes automatically.They’re not talking about getting rid of the conference title games. They’re just saying those games shouldn’t determine the top 4.
Which makes sense… the conference title games guarantee entrance into March Madness, but they don’t guarantee the 4 #1 seeds. Should be the same for football.
I never said ESPN mentioned the conference championship games just they are already floating conference champions not getting first round byes automatically.
Do you believe that for the NCAA tourney also?If not, why have them. Major conference champions should get a bye. They earned it.
Most likely scenario is the top 4 seeds get a bye regardless if they won their conference. Conference winners that have to play in the 1st round get a home game.They’re not talking about getting rid of the conference title games. They’re just saying those games shouldn’t determine the top 4.
Which makes sense… the conference title games guarantee entrance into March Madness, but they don’t guarantee the 4 #1 seeds. Should be the same for football.
i have no problem with that. they probably shouldn't, just like conference title winners in March Madness aren't guaranteed #1 seeds.I never said ESPN mentioned the conference championship games just they are already floating conference champions not getting first round byes automatically.
yup.Most likely scenario is the top 4 seeds get a bye regardless if they won their conference. Conference winners that have to play in the 1st round get a home game.
Basically the nfl system
Do you believe that for the NCAA tourney also?
they deserve a spot in the playoffs, but I don't think they deserve a first round bye.
I mean, taking that to a logical conclusion, Clemson deserves a home game... even though they're a 12 seed?
Yeah thinking about it the nfl isn't the greatest example since the top seeds are always division winners.yup.
but not the nfl system
I think that's the way to go. The winner of a "major" CCG should punch a ticket to the playoff, but not necessarily get a top seed. Kinda funny that there is still so much controversy around the bracket selections. Some thought that there would be a lot less of it when the field expanded from just four teams.i have no problem with that. they probably shouldn't, just like conference title winners in March Madness aren't guaranteed #1 seeds.