I went back and looked at Marion's early numbers. In year 1 (99-00), he shot 47.1% and averaged 10.1 ppg and 6.5 rpg in just 24.7 minutes.
Year 2 two he averaged 17.3 ppg on 48% shooting and had 10.7 rpg in 36.2 minutes.
Year 3 he averaged 19.1 ppg on 46.9% (but went 48 of 122 for three) and grabbed 9.9 rgp
Year 4 (2002-03) he averaged 21.2 ppg on 45.2% (but shot 38.7% for three) and grabbed 9.5 rpg
Year 5 (2003-04) he averaged 19.0 ppg on 44% and grabbed 9.3 rpg (his three point shooting dropped to 34.0%)
Year 6 (2004-05) he averaged 19.4 ppg on 47.6% and grabbed 11.3 rpg
Year 7 (2005-06) he averaged 21.8 ppg on 52.5% and grabbed 11.8 rpg)
Year 8 (2006-07) he averaged 17.5 ppg on 52.4% and grabbed 9.8 rpg)
The most obvious conclusion is that playing with Nash did not change his scoring but did help his shooting percentage. The faster pace helped his rebounding stats although a healthy Stoudemire hurt is overall stats.
Year 2 two he averaged 17.3 ppg on 48% shooting and had 10.7 rpg in 36.2 minutes.
Year 3 he averaged 19.1 ppg on 46.9% (but went 48 of 122 for three) and grabbed 9.9 rgp
Year 4 (2002-03) he averaged 21.2 ppg on 45.2% (but shot 38.7% for three) and grabbed 9.5 rpg
Year 5 (2003-04) he averaged 19.0 ppg on 44% and grabbed 9.3 rpg (his three point shooting dropped to 34.0%)
Year 6 (2004-05) he averaged 19.4 ppg on 47.6% and grabbed 11.3 rpg
Year 7 (2005-06) he averaged 21.8 ppg on 52.5% and grabbed 11.8 rpg)
Year 8 (2006-07) he averaged 17.5 ppg on 52.4% and grabbed 9.8 rpg)
The most obvious conclusion is that playing with Nash did not change his scoring but did help his shooting percentage. The faster pace helped his rebounding stats although a healthy Stoudemire hurt is overall stats.