Trade makes more sense now
But why wait so long?
Strange moves by the FO
Seems like another rookie mistake
But why wait so long?
Strange moves by the FO
Seems like another rookie mistake
The lack of foresight this FO has is troubling to say the least.
The issue is a lack of foresight… and to be honest, talent evaluation. Even entertaining the idea of Colt McCoy being your stopgap starter going into the season was insipid stupidity AFAIC.Yup - new regime took their time to get to see what he had. He had nothing, so they moved on and got a replacement.
Not sure what the issue is.
Yup - new regime took their time to get to see what he had. He had nothing, so they moved on and got a replacement.
Not sure what the issue is.
He was alarmingly bad the majority of last season when he played.fwiw:
Calvisi said that Colt's play in both practices in Minnesota was alarmingly bad
a lot packed into that "fwiw"
They were idiots to do all of that.
And his experience? He is an AWFUL Starting QB and even last year was a below average backup. That experience is meaningless when the overwhelming majority of it was bad to awful.
And they decided for 98% of the off-season, they were going with that trash to be their opening day starter. And now are facing starting a QB who will have what… ten days with the team and never even taken a pre-season snap to start the year… who they ALSO could have gotten much much earlier this season, but were literally a day late and a dollar short, continuing to show their lack of foresight there.
LOL at the outrage. This is a team that is clearly rebuilding. Rebuilding teams generally invest very little in back up QBs. It's better that way, they aren't competing anyway even with a high end backup.They were idiots to do all of that.
And his experience? He is an AWFUL Starting QB and even last year was a below average backup. That experience is meaningless when the overwhelming majority of it was bad to awful.
And they decided for 98% of the off-season, they were going with that trash to be their opening day starter. And now are facing starting a QB who will have what… ten days with the team and never even taken a pre-season snap to start the year… who they ALSO could have gotten much much earlier this season, but were literally a day late and a dollar short, continuing to show their lack of foresight there.
His arm is toast.fwiw:
Calvisi said that Colt's play in both practices in Minnesota was alarmingly bad
a lot packed into that "fwiw"
Do we know officially it's not a Waived/Injured designation?
You're assuming Dobbs will start. I don't think he will.
Honestly, there could be something to that...same with Simmons. Could very well the FO had to prove, without a shadow of a doubt that both guys needed to be let go.To me all of this speaks of a lack of unified vision with the front office.
McCoy being a Bidwill guy...Hard Knocks...
We probably had to get a complete disaster to move on.
I find it funny that on one hand people say they're tanking and then on the other hand complain about moves like this.The issue is a lack of foresight… and to be honest, talent evaluation. Even entertaining the idea of Colt McCoy being your stopgap starter going into the season was insipid stupidity AFAIC.
Or do you think it’s common for NFL teams to flat out cut their QB who ran with the #1s ALL OFF-SEASON ten days before the season starts.
The issue isn’t cutting him now. It was believing for even a nanosecond that he could/should open the season as your starter.
I don't necessarily agree with this either. If this saves us even more cap space and he wasn't the guy, then why not do it?To me all of this speaks of a lack of unified vision with the front office.
McCoy being a Bidwill guy...Hard Knocks...
We probably had to get a complete disaster to move on.
That is completely fair. Although he was splitting time with Tune for most of the preseason, right?Anybody trying to spin giving most of the 1st team reps in camp to a guy you cut before the first game is crazy.
I have no problem with cutting him. How it took you 6 months to figure out he would not be the starter is just horrendous. If this was Keim and KK it would be a meltdown.
This is pretty similar, but less egregious, than the Leinart/Anderson situation.Anybody trying to spin giving most of the 1st team reps in camp to a guy you cut before the first game is crazy.
I have no problem with cutting him. How it took you 6 months to figure out he would not be the starter is just horrendous. If this was Keim and KK it would be a meltdown.
I don't necessarily agree with this either. If this saves us even more cap space and he wasn't the guy, then why not do it?
They weren't going to bring in a 6-10M dollar backup with Colt on the roster. And they traded for Dobbs, who they think is an upgrade over Colt. (I'd assume)
I'd argue that this speaks more that they have a plan, then not.
..and why should he?He has a 2.5 million dollar guaranteed salary. I am going to take a solid stab that Bidwill didn't want to just give that away for free.