But for the kid running the ponytail into the log, I thought that fight was awesome.Jeez! That kid went bananas! I'm all in on this flick!!!
But for the kid running the ponytail into the log, I thought that fight was awesome.Jeez! That kid went bananas! I'm all in on this flick!!!
Personally, I like it. You don't have to guess at the depth of his badassness. Yeah, the Cimmerans (sp?) were badasses, but this kid stood and fought GROWN MEN while the rest of the supposed badass kids turned tail.Why do filmmakers feel the need to do Conan's back story?
Seriously. Based on that clip, I think that looks more interesting than the rest of the movie.Well, I'm sold. I'm looking forward to watching Jason Momoa but I halfway think I'd rather watch The Adventures of Little Conan.
Steve
Makes sense.Personally, I like it. You don't have to guess at the depth of his badassness. Yeah, the Cimmerans (sp?) were badasses, but this kid stood and fought GROWN MEN while the rest of the supposed badass kids turned tail.
F yeah.
Seriously. Based on that clip, I think that looks more interesting than the rest of the movie.
Personally, I like it. You don't have to guess at the depth of his badassness. Yeah, the Cimmerans (sp?) were badasses, but this kid stood and fought GROWN MEN while the rest of the supposed badass kids turned tail.
F yeah.
I'm pretty sure it's Hollywood law somewhere that any and all badass roles have to be offered to Anquan first. Yeah, I'm pretty sure I read that somewhere.A lot of people don't know this, but Conan was originally going to be played by Anquan Boldin.
A lot of people don't know this, but Conan was originally going to be played by Anquan Boldin.
Personally, I like it. You don't have to guess at the depth of his badassness. Yeah, the Cimmerans (sp?) were badasses, but this kid stood and fought GROWN MEN while the rest of the supposed badass kids turned tail.
F yeah.
Yeah, but that has little to do with his childhood and more to do with it being the exact same movie. I have a problem with that, too...just not with the idea of telling Conan's backstory.It's been done before in the SAME MOVIE, it wastes time, and it ignores material far better than any of those lousy writers could ever dream up. I hate it. I don't want a stupid remake of the movie; it was already a good movie that didn't follow the source material. We don't need THE EXACT SAME EFFING THING!!!!!
I kind of feel strongly about this
Yeah, but that has little to do with his childhood and more to do with it being the exact same movie. I have a problem with that, too...just not with the idea of telling Conan's backstory.
Aside from it not being covered in the Robert Howard canon, it simply wastes time. Who cares about his childhood? He is a bad-assed barbarian that is more intelligent and cunning than all other barbarians. He raises himself to be a king more than once, a feat that most barbarians would find impossible. He has incredible adventures, faces fantastic magic and horrendous creatures. We don't need a back story for that; in fact, it takes precious screen time away from the main story.
Or what could be the main story. Instead, the idiots are matching the original move point for point, it would seem. The main plot? Revenge for his father. Really? I mean, really? With all of those rich stories to draw upon, they're sticking with revenging his father? Pathetic.
There comes a time, Stout, when the films cease to sparkle, when the television loses its luster, when the home theater becomes a prison, and all that is left is a fan's love for the source material.
Maybe I am a purist, I dunno....I remember the first time I saw Schwarzeneggar, and my first thought was they need to make a Conan movie, and have this guy play Conan....the only issue was Arnold was a tad short, other than that he was perfect for Conan......
enter Jason Mamoa........are ya ****ing kiddin me?? Jason is tall enough, but nowhere near the Conan build.....and Mamoa is a terrible actor,...he is getting better, as his work on G.O.T. showed, but he is in no way fit to lead a movie,.....and to play Conan?? That is like Blasphemy....then in an interview, he said Drogo would whoop Conan, rediculous!! Conan would beat drogo like a stepchild with his ****in dick!!
I will watch it because I am a life long fan,....but I am fully expecting to be disappointed.
Ya know, I used to have a copy of the very first SSOC magazine, "The fiend in the Haunted Cavern"...got it at the swap meet for 50 cents....my cousin traded my comic collection for a sack of weed and a boom box....saw the mag at a convention some years later....5 grand....damn cousins
Maybe I am a purist, I dunno....I remember the first time I saw Schwarzeneggar, and my first thought was they need to make a Conan movie, and have this guy play Conan....the only issue was Arnold was a tad short, other than that he was perfect for Conan......
enter Jason Mamoa........are ya ****ing kiddin me?? Jason is tall enough, but nowhere near the Conan build
Arnold is 6' 2", Jason Mamoa is 6' 4", not really a whole lot of difference heightwise.
And I'd venture to say Jason is a more accomplished actor at this point than Arnold was at that point....unless you were a huge fan of Hercules in New York
Have read the books. Conan was not exactly a dolt.Arnold is about 5'11 1/2"....... Jason does have a longer acting resume, but it all sucks...GoT is the best he has done so far in what is basically a non speaking role. He was horrible in Stargate Atlantis.
Mamoa does not have the build to be Conan, he is in great shape, but the overall size and definition just is not there.
Arnold's accent is a non issue....unless you have had a conversation with a Cimmerian?
Have read the books. Conan was not exactly a dolt.