Joe, "Where does he say that everything is just fine on offense?"
You know, I just went back and read the quote and realized his statement "Just these guys this year seeing offenses and understanding the schemes that we had and they become second nature." is not about the teams offense at all. I read it as saying the guys were understanding their own offensive schemes and they'd become second nature. Reading it more carefully, I'm not sure what it means but it clearly doesn't mean what I thought.
On the other hand in a very recent quote he did say the he thought the offense was pretty good - perhaps in another part of this same article.
>> Where does he say that they will not run and high post offense?<<
What? I said he's never mentioned the high post offense so how could you interpret that as me claiming he said we'd never use it.
>>Why are you so hung up on the high post offense as the only way to go?<<
I don't think the high post offense is the only way to go. But I do think with a C who can shoot from some distance and pass pretty well, a high post offense would fit Amare's, and JJ's games extremely well. With minor adjustments, it would also work well against zone defenses. It would probably fit Marion's game if he played on the baseline instead of being a second SG. As to the C we have Lampe who has promise of being a good fit for the HP and McDyess has the shooting range though he's probably weak in the passing part. Maybe Zarko could be the high post man in some lineups. Sounds like enough to worthy of serious consideration to me and better than what I've seen the team doing on the floor.
My arrival at the high post starts with the premise that we'd like to keep the opponents C well away from the low post, so as to facilitate Amare operating there. Now our C could float around the floor in an ad hoc fashion or we could structure an offense that has our C out away but still performing more useful things than just keeping out of the way. Out high he could run the pick & roll/fade with JJ or the pinch post manuever - more good stuff. That fairly shouts "high post offense" to me.
>>Only a fool does not see that while the offense isn't perfect it isn't the biggest problem with this team.<<
Only a fool or someone who's tired of belaboring the obvious. I've beat up coach Mikey for his defensive failings so often I just thought I'd give it a rest... let the second string have a go at him. (Uncivil remarks mustn't go entirely unpunished!
)