arthurracoon said:
Crazy Canuck said:
There are better examples in support of your usual, rather tiresome - anti Josh diatribes than the SF games. Our "D" collapse in the last 5 min. of the first game became the greatest comeback in 9er history.
However, some of that was because our D was on the field so much.
Our offenses inablilty to start a drive and keep the D off the field in the final minutes of the game was one of the main reasons we lost that game.
Huh???
Actually, according to the official stats (
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/gamebook/NFL_20041010_ARI@SF), the Cardinals had the ball for 9:19 of the first quarter, 15:47 of the first half, 22:47 of the first three quarters, and 30:49 of the first four quarters. When McCown threw a 24-yard pass to Fitzgerald to give the Cardinals a 28-12 lead with 8:19 to go in regulation, the 49ers had only had the ball for 1:17 of the 4th quarter vs. 5:24 for the Cardinals. At that point in the game, the Cardinals had held the ball for 28:11 vs. 23:30 for the 49ers.
Then Tim freaking Rattay proceeded to guide the 49ers to consecutive TD drives of 80 and 72 yards, followed by two successful two-point conversions.
True, in 14 offensive possessions, the Cardinals had four 3-and-out series, including one between the 49ers' fourth-quarter TD's, and one after the 49ers' tying TD, with 1:07 left in the game. (McCown completed 9-yard passes on both possessions!)
Of course it's correct that if the offense had executed yet another long drive in the fourth quarter, rather than going 3-and-out, they would've won the game. But the bottom line is that i don't think it's reasonable to excuse the defensive collapse at the end of that game "because our D was on the field so much."
...dave