It's still a one inning job, regardless of leverage, until the league adjusts back to the original way a closer was used (think Gossage and Marshall).
If Bradley gets us from the 6th to the 9th coming in at high leverage situations and also throwing multiple innings, that has serious value. We will see if his usage rate is there though (he's only appeared in 4 games so far).
There is another factor involved in pitching the 6th to the 9th. In the NL, you have to take into consideration the need to pinch-hit for the pitcher in later innings.
It puts us at a disadvantage compared to the AL. And why I, as much as I've opposed the DH rule, have been advocating for the NL to get on board and be truly competitive with the AL. And be consistent with just about every other level of baseball throughout the country and the world and switch to the DL.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
I didn't get to see the latter part of last night's series finale vs. the Dodgers, but what a performance. Our 1st and 2nd batters in the lineup going 8-for-10 (each 4-for-5), accounting for all but two of the team's hits. I've never seen a performance like that in the 65 years that I have been following Major League (especially National League) baseball.
And by two guys who were close to the Mendoza line -- one who had just climbed over .200 and the other still below it. I was hoping they could both get back to the .240-.260 range as a first plateau. 'Never dreamed they'd reach it in the next game.
And a starting pitcher who couldn't find the strike zone, keeping the score down and keeping us in the game. A gutsy performance. But a trend that is not going to get us through the season.