OK. I understand that people are frustrated that situations like this exist, but before Igor came, he was considered exactly that guy. He was considered the BEST guy in the business for teaching and guiding young players and that reputation was developed over 17 years in the league. I know its common habit when the students aren't learning fast enough to blame the teachers. But I would hate to fire a good teacher, get a worse teacher and then find out that the problem was slow students.
He had a 17 year history of teaching young players as an assistant coach and was considered somewhat of a savant at it. I am not making that up.That's not entirely accurate. Who valued him as the best in the business? Seems to me the market was very small for Igor in the NBA. I didn't see any bidding wars happening over our coach. Second, it doesn't matter what people "thought".
The NBA is full of coaches some people "thought" would be the best for something. That doesn't mean what people thought were correct.
Here is my thing. When I look at a team that isn't completely devoid of talent. Has some unique players like Booker and said coach really hasn't brought anything to the table? There is a problem. He just helped the Suns set a new record in futility.
If Igor had been bringing anything to the table I would be happy with that. I just don't see it.
He is so open, and just "out there" about this stuff. You are right, he should know how to do this, but his candidness is really refreshing.this is such an odd thing for a C to not know how to do... especially for a guy who's offense comes very naturally. hoping we get a big man coach who can really make a difference here. He's got to get better at the rim.
He had a 17 year history of teaching young players as an assistant coach and was considered somewhat of a savant at it. I am not making that up.
Is seems to be the case. He might just be a weirdly unique player in being a 7 footer who shows better perimeter defense than as a rim protector. The last two games certainly trend in that direction.It is pretty clear that the type of defense we WANT Ayton to play, and the type of defense HE wants to play are quite different. He seems to really love the challenge to playing the other team's best big, even if it is a very mobile big like LeBron, one on one. It gets his juices going. Hanging back, switching off and guarding the rim, seems to confuse him.
He should be able to do the latter, but cannot seem to do it well for now. I am for putting him in the best defensive role for him to succeed, just like he has done the last two games, and then adding to his defensive skills over time. That would mean playing pf on defense most nights.
Zions the optimal running mate , but if Ayton wants to be a perimeter defender then they need someone whose gonna stay back and be a force on the boardsIs seems to be the case. He might just be a weirdly unique player in being a 7 footer who shows better perimeter defense than as a rim protector. The last two games certainly trend in that direction.
Makes me wonder what’s the optimal running mate for him at PF. Do we need a traditional rim protector or do we just need a rugged rebounder and have a scrambling defense sans shotblocker. Would be pretty unique.
We need someone who is a good rebounder.Is seems to be the case. He might just be a weirdly unique player in being a 7 footer who shows better perimeter defense than as a rim protector. The last two games certainly trend in that direction.
Makes me wonder what’s the optimal running mate for him at PF. Do we need a traditional rim protector or do we just need a rugged rebounder and have a scrambling defense sans shotblocker. Would be pretty unique.
Is seems to be the case. He might just be a weirdly unique player in being a 7 footer who shows better perimeter defense than as a rim protector. The last two games certainly trend in that direction.
Makes me wonder what’s the optimal running mate for him at PF. Do we need a traditional rim protector or do we just need a rugged rebounder and have a scrambling defense sans shotblocker. Would be pretty unique.
Dude. He has been IN the NBA coaching for 17 years. He did not just come to the NBA.Hold on. I never questioned his resume. You are completely missing my point. TONS of coaches with solid resumes have come to the NBA. It doesn't mean in translates to the NBA. It doesn't mean they make a good NBA coach.
My point was only that he wasn't a coach that tons of teams were in bidding wars for. It doesn't mean that other teams regarded him the same way the Suns did. So far the evidence seems to indicate he is not a good coach.
That's interesting. Where did you get that stat.Jesus fricking christ
Ayton is allowing the same defended FG%within 6ft as Gobert and Embiid since new years. And its not like he is defending less shots really.
Let’s remember that he’s the first foreign born head coach. So he’s actually a trailblazer despite the 17 years. It’s not like what he’s accomplished is commonplace and he was an outlier for it taking so long. On the contrary he’s the first of his kind, so to speak.Is it normal to be an assistant coach that long (17 years) without being promoted to head coach?
I really don't know, but it seems to me, the type of person that would make an excellent head coach (aggressive leader that has to win and be the best) would grow tired of being an assistant well before the 17 year mark.
Are there any examples of a guy who was an assistant for 15+ years and turned into a great coach?
That's interesting. Where did you get that stat.
It is true that there is more to defense than blocked shots.
Dude. He has been IN the NBA coaching for 17 years. He did not just come to the NBA.
Head coach!?
it was blatantly obvious that's what you meant.
Is it normal to be an assistant coach that long (17 years) without being promoted to head coach?
I really don't know, but it seems to me, the type of person that would make an excellent head coach (aggressive leader that has to win and be the best) would grow tired of being an assistant well before the 17 year mark.
Are there any examples of a guy who was an assistant for 15+ years and turned into a great coach?
You hit the nail on the head. With 17 years of assistant coach experience, he is a career assistant coach. And for a reason.He had a 17 year history of teaching young players as an assistant coach and was considered somewhat of a savant at it. I am not making that up.
He is not a leader or figurehead. And he has neither the credentials nor personality to knock sense into the mind of a meddling owner.