JCSunsfan
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2002
- Posts
- 22,114
- Reaction score
- 6,547
Booker looked very good today. He doesn't need to dominate the ball to impact the game and he just moves effortlessly.
Wow.
Wow.
That's a myth. The best shooters in the league today shoot with their feet close together as it actually creates better balance on the shot.My point is that we can afford to wait and keep developing Goodwin if he continues to be patient and work hard. It's stupid to get rid of young talent too soon without good reason. He might yet turn out great.
I think we have a good two guard rotation with our two starting combo guards, Archie, Weems and Booker. Should replace McNeal and Ronnie Price with a small classic PG that can shoot open 3s and just bring the ball up.
One problem I have though is with his stance. His feet are too close together when he shoots so he does not get proper balance. They should square up with his shoulders. Jeff or jumpshot #8 should have pointed this out by now...
Would love it if Booker and Goodwin kept Weems on the bench. Obviously Booker offers a lot of promise as a classic shooting guard. Goodwin has a more all-around game but he must work on his defence and shooting. I don't know much about Weems.
Exciting to see how it turns out this year on all positions really. Chandler and Len, Kieff without his twin and how Teletovic performs, seeing if TJ replaces PJ, how the guard rotation plays out and perhaps most importantly how Bledsoe and Knight work together.
I'm most pessimistic with the ongoing dual combo guard project. Knight can shoot and Bledsoe has improved, but I'm not convinced they can run an offence to get easy shots and shots in the paint. I hope I'm wrong!
Archie is much better off the dribble.I am not sure where Goodwin has an advantage over booker. He seems to be the same or better in every category I can think of. Maybe Archie is a tad quicker, but not by much. But even that doesn't matter if Booker finishes as well or better at the rim.
Also another myth. Most of the best shooters sway their shoulders back and sweep their feet forward when they shoot. They do not elevate "straight up" when they shoot. When I say sweep and sway I'm not referring to a fadeaway either as the fadeaway is an off balance shot that usually results in the shooter kicking one foot forward and landing on one foot. With the sweep and sway you still land on both feet and the point is to help you get proper elevation/arc on your jump shot. Some of the other shooting myths out there are that you shouldn't dip the ball after you catch it and that your feet and shoulders should be squared up to the basket. There is some really good information in the 10 video series if you care to watch:The shoulder wide stance is mainly to ensure that you elevate straight up when you come off screens or pull up the dribble. I think it's easier to go straight up when you have a little space between your feet. I'm not talking about the set shot from the floor (ft, 3pt).
He has to keep working on it. Take hundreds of shots from left and right shoulder three (corner three is for forwards) and pulling up from dribble around the ft line. Get really good from a select few spots.
I heard the video just fine. The point he was making was that a shoulder wide stance is NOT optimal. YOu are not more stable, in fact less stable with it and you are not as quick with it. He also pointed out that the best shooters do not use it.