Jetstream Green
Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Better then Micheal Floyd? Hell yes.
Just as problematic... hell yes
Better then Micheal Floyd? Hell yes.
What does Bryant do now as a receiver better than Floyd? He is not faster, he doesn't run better routes and he doesn't contest jump balls better.Better then Micheal Floyd? Hell yes.
What does Bryant do better than Floyd? Well for starters he's about to get signed by someone and actually be on a roster, so it's fair to say he does a lot of stuff better.What does Bryant do now as a receiver better than Floyd? He is not faster, he doesn't run better routes and he doesn't contest jump balls better.
Bryant can be man covered effectively by a team's number two corner.
On the Cardinals Bryant sits on the bench behind JJ Nelson because the defense has to honor Nelson's speed.
I must admit that I would like the Cardinals to sign Bryant. Even though he has regressed the last couple of years, I think he would easily be the second or at least third best receiver on the roster. I also think he has some good years left, and after all, it has happened before that players suddenly plays well again after a change of scenery.
Obviously, he can be somewhat of a distraction in the locker room and on the sideline, but I would trust Fitzgerald to get Bryant under control.
I think you guys have Dez Jr. in butler. he is a special talent and also has a lot of confidence in his ability to make tough plays that others don't make in traffic. butler is a lot cheaper and will probably be a better soldier in a healthy environment that fitz creates. dez in dallas was good when he was productive and had the right QB, but now the ship has sailed and he waited too late to make an attempt to become an adult which is why dallas cut him. It cannot be overlooked that Bryant was awful last year especially when dallas needed him the most. he dropped a lot of balls, gave up on routes, and had a terrible fumble against seattle when the season was on the line. and that fumble was after he threw a tantrum on the sideline because he wasn't getting the ball.
Why would it be Fitz's job to get Bryant 'under control?'
So what media outlets do you use in dallas? I still listen to the ticket online when I can but can not stand ESPN or 105.3 the fan. Or do you live in south Texas? They probably are even more cult-like there?I would not say Butler will ever have the impact of Dez in his prime or close to it but a lot here seem to base every critique they make by being a Google professor for stats. I live in Cowboy country and have had to see Cowboy highlights and commentary on a consistent bases (even when you don't want to haha), and Butler is much better than some here I think give him credit for
What does Bryant do now as a receiver better than Floyd? He is not faster, he doesn't run better routes and he doesn't contest jump balls better.
Bryant can be man covered effectively by a team's number two corner.
On the Cardinals Bryant sits on the bench behind JJ Nelson because the defense has to honor Nelson's speed.
I am fairly sure I did not write what you claim.
It’s not his job. Just as it wasn’t Patrick Peterson’s job to take care of Tyrann Mathieu. Or that is wasn’t Carson Palmer’s job to take care of Blaine Gabbert. Or that when you read the multiple articles that says that some veteran will tutor a younger player, it most likely doesn’t actually say in the veteran’s contract that it is his job to do so.
Check your post at #77 of this thread:
"Obviously, he can be somewhat of a distraction in the locker room and on the sideline, but I would trust Fitzgerald to get Bryant under control."
It's not Fitz's job to get a veteran WR 'under control.' Fitz will be learning a new O just as Dez would.
I don’t see where he said it was his “job”. It is reasonable to think Fitz would assist Dez as a leader on this team.
You just seem to enjoy arguing and beating a topic to death.
I was responding to Ghandi's comment in post #77 and the comment that he "would trust Fitzgerald to get Bryant under control."
That's not Fitz's responsibility or job or whatever. I don't think it is reasonable to trust that Fitz does anything to get Bryant under control. Both are veteran players.
Ghandi addressed a comment back at me. Would you prefer I ignore the question and not give the courtesy of a response?
You seem to enjoy sticking your nose into a conversation that has nothing to do with you. Allow Ghandi to respond for himself.
That’s the interesting part for me. Is dallas to blame for letting dez be a diva from day one or is dez to blame? I think it is both. And Jerry has the eat this one because of the culture he has promoted. but dez may benefit from going somewhere else where there is no red carpet rolled out for him and he has to prove himself as well as be an adult on and off the field. For me that is the only way he’s going to have success. In many ways him getting drafted by dallas was a double edged sword and this was always bound to happen.On paper, I think Dez would benefit greatly by going to an offense that had Fitz and Johnson. IMO, he's at a point in his career where he isn't quite able to take over a secondary all on his own but would see more open looks with Fitz and Johnson dividing the defense's attention. I didn't watch a lot of Dallas games but it seemed like they relied on Dez to create when they decided to pass.
But, would Dez fit personality-wise? I think that's a real concern for any team considering him. What is he going to be like now that he isn't in Dallas and not the center of attention? Is he going to try and create attention with antics? Will he grow up and focus on winning? Big questions for anyone willing to take him on.
Check your post at #77 of this thread:
"Obviously, he can be somewhat of a distraction in the locker room and on the sideline, but I would trust Fitzgerald to get Bryant under control."
It's not Fitz's job to get a veteran WR 'under control.' Fitz will be learning a new O just as Dez would.
If you would show me where in my post it explicitly writes that I would make it anyone’s specific job to take care of another player, and thus is not something you have interpreted yourself. After that it would be great if you would prove to the board that veterans in fact do not take other players under their wings in various ways even though it is not in their job description. If you do those things, then your argument would be valid.
So, what exactly did you mean by saying I would trust Fitzgerald to get Bryant under control. What would you have Fitz do????
Well, you could call it a job if you like. I call it taking responsibility. I believe that Fitzgerald has proven that it is something he takes pride in doing.
I would expect him to be Larry Fitzgerald.
Like TRW said, you seem to argue just for the sake of arguing.