elindholm
edited for content
NY doesn't have any cap space (expiring deals) to offer Charlotte.
Sure they do. They have the biggest expiring contract in league history.
NY doesn't have any cap space (expiring deals) to offer Charlotte.
How 'bout dem RAMS Cheese?! Its too bad the LIONS didn't get us on their schedule LOL
Hill Interested In Return To Magic?
Dec 16, 2008 3:39 PM EST
You must be registered for see images attachA year after leaving the team, Brian Schmitz of the Orlando Sentinel reports Grant Hill might want to reunite with the Magic next summer.
His sources say there is mutual interest but nothing can be said because it would be tampering.
Schmitz does suggest a possible swap of Hill and disgruntled Magic guard J.J. Redick which according to our Trade Checker would work under NBA trade rules.
First of all, Charlotte cannot package Diaw or Bell in a trade to any team for 2 months, which would put that right near the trade deadline (Feb 10th to be exact).
/quote]
I'm not certain that your statement is accurate. Wikipedia validates your claim:
If a team acquires a player in a trade, they are allowed to trade that player straight-up for another individual player immediately. However, if they wish to package that player with another and make a trade, the team must wait 60 days before doing so.
However this link does not:
http://www.nbpa.com/cba_articles/article-VII_8.php
Any other source you can provide to backup your claim?
Yup, http://http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm
Larry Coon has pretty much dissected the CBA and outsourced it to the fans.
The Bell and Diaw can be traded alone at any point, but cannot be packaged with another player (including each other) for 60 days.
Sure they do. They have the biggest expiring contract in league history.
Marbury won't be traded.
Probably not, but that wasn't the claim. The claim was that the Knicks don't have an expiring contract available.
Next I bet you won't let me say that LeBron is untradeable and come up with a scenerio that works under the cap...
Well, sure, if you said that James won't be traded "because he makes too much money," or some other faulty reason, I would probably dispute it.
It's sad when people don't read between the lines instead of looking for ways to critique.
I think you're still missing the point. I'm happy to continue this conversation by PM if you are interested.
No need to continue it further. We're good. No hard feelings.
Since you've been the one doing all of the name-calling, that's mighty big of you.
Diaw is playing well, glad to see that. Bell is clearly done. As for teh 60 day rule, no thing exists....
couple seasons ago Rasheed Wallace was traded from Portland to Atlanta, and a few days later he was traded to Detroit.
In addition, teams cannot trade players under the following circumstances:
- For two months after receiving the player in trade or claiming him off waivers, if the player is being traded in combination with other players. However, the team is free to trade the player by himself (not packaged with other players) immediately. This restriction applies only to teams over the salary cap. (Also see question number 72 for a special case where players can be traded together in less than two months.)
No kidding? I wasn't even talking about that...
I think he was referring to Irish implying that Diaw is not a D'Antoni guy and my comment that Diaw is...
Diaw is playing well, glad to see that. Bell is clearly done. As for teh 60 day rule, no thing exists....
couple seasons ago Rasheed Wallace was traded from Portland to Atlanta, and a few days later he was traded to Detroit.