Dumbest Draft Move

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
12,779
Reaction score
28,098
Location
Orlando, FL
You may recall in my Cleveland strategy post I mentioned SF was trying to rope-a-dope the Browns by making them think SF liked Trubisky. Cleveland didn't fall for it. Incredibly Chicago did and gave up 3 picks for a player they could have had by standing still. Not to mention this was way to early for him.
 

Vermont Maverick

Registered
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Posts
1,861
Reaction score
181
Location
Williston, Vermont
You may recall in my Cleveland strategy post I mentioned SF was trying to rope-a-dope the Browns by making them think SF liked Trubisky. Cleveland didn't fall for it. Incredibly Chicago did and gave up 3 picks for a player they could have had by standing still. Not to mention this was way to early for him.

This doesn't really add up. This didn't have to do with San Francisco bluffing that they wanted him, Chicago traded with SF because they were worried about Cleveland moving there. If San Francisco wanted him, they wouldn't have been talking to the Bears saying "Oh, we really like this guy...but we are willing to pass if you really want him." That doesn't happen with QBs. You like them or you don't.
 

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,816
Reaction score
9,649
Location
milan-italy
san francisco were considering offers for the number 2 pick thats why chicago has been forced to trade, anything u can do to draft your franchise qb is worth
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,290
Reaction score
43,293
Location
Colorado
Agreed, SF did very well on paper. There are reasons that Foster dropped, but none had to do with his play on the field.
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,450
Reaction score
14,742
my suggestion for dumb move:

Seattle moving out of round 1.

Ryan Ramcyk, Tackle was right there. Wisconsin lineman tend to pan out, and, you dont have to mess with the transition from the spread. This seems like a pick where Seattle could have plugged him at one of the tackle spots and upgraded their OL situation immediately.

in a thin tackle draft, they missed arguably the best one.
 

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
13,976
Reaction score
4,175
Location
annapolis, md
my suggestion for dumb move:

Seattle moving out of round 1.

Ryan Ramcyk, Tackle was right there. Wisconsin lineman tend to pan out, and, you dont have to mess with the transition from the spread. This seems like a pick where Seattle could have plugged him at one of the tackle spots and upgraded their OL situation immediately.

in a thin tackle draft, they missed arguably the best one.
Normally I'd agree but Tom Cable has been making chicken salad out of chicken ---- out there like it's easy.
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
The Bears move was a result of somebody else trying to trade with SF. So the "All that to only move up 1 spot?!" criticism is a little inaccurate. If they didnt, then somebody else wouldve traded with SF and taken Mitch.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,524
Reaction score
16,774
Location
San Antonio, Texas
san francisco were considering offers for the number 2 pick thats why chicago has been forced to trade, anything u can do to draft your franchise qb is worth

Or that is what Lynch told them gullible Bears, and all is fair in love for football
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,084
Reaction score
3,354
Normally I'd agree but Tom Cable has been making chicken salad out of chicken ---- out there like it's easy.

Cable is a fantastic OL coach but when the Seahawks were going to SB's their Oline took up a chunk of their salary CAP and they had maybe the worst OLine in the NFL last year.
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,421
Reaction score
21,862
Location
South Bay
Agreed, SF did very well on paper. There are reasons that Foster dropped, but none had to do with his play on the field.

If you listened to Jurecki this morning, he indicated that on top of his questionable conduct and failed test, his football IQ was found to be pretty low, which were simply too many red flags for Keim to overcome.
 

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
13,976
Reaction score
4,175
Location
annapolis, md
i would argue differently -- Seattle had a bottom 5 OL in the league last year and likely cost them playoff advancement.
Have you looked at who's been on the line? Defensive linemen and guys we didn't want. I think he's done wonders with what he's been given. I agree the line needs help but I think they think he could field a really solid line with some late picks that were at least drafted to play o line.
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
It's also possible they thought someone else (mainly Clevland) was interested in moving there and taking him, so they paid the price for their guy. But I would've stayed at 3 as well. You get him or the best DL.
 

Shane

My time of year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
70,144
Reaction score
41,524
Location
Las Vegas
The Bears move was a result of somebody else trying to trade with SF. So the "All that to only move up 1 spot?!" criticism is a little inaccurate. If they didnt, then somebody else wouldve traded with SF and taken Mitch.

Pure conjecture with nothing to back it up
 
Top