Mitch
Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
I get the sense that the Cardinals under new DC Todd Bowles have an OLB/DE proto-type in mind---someone who is strong enough at the point of attack to set and maintain the edge, someone who is strong enough to generate an effective bull rush, and ideally someone who can disengage from blocks quickly to make stops on athletic QBs. if this is truly the case, the Cardinals will be less inclined to take edge rushers who rely primarily on speed and quickness.
Bruce Arians and Todd Bowles want the defense to be more physical, more imposing of their athletic will and more punishing in the way in which they attack the ball carriers and wide receivers.
There are some very intriguing edge rushers that will be scooped up early in this draft---let's see which ones might be the most appealing to the Cardinals:
Jarvis Jones, 6-2, 245, Georgia
2011: tackles: 70; tackles for loss: 17.5; sacks: 8.5; ints: 0. forced fumb: 2
2012: 85/24.5/14.5/1/7
Jones vs. Alabama 2012:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqczNIJJ2O4
This tape tells you pretty much all you need to know about Jarvis Jones:
Areas in which he excels:
Quick off the ball
Tenacious
Plays to the whistle
Doubles back to the ball on his pass rush in a flash
Tries to meet contact on blocks, shed and still make tackle---which he did on a pull block by Chance Warmack
Plays plenty fast on tape (forget recent 40 time)
Quickness and alertness are his forte
Areas in which he struggles:
Holding and maintaining the edge: see the Eddie Lacy TD---this is what NFL teams will do repeatedly---they will run to his side, straight at him
Rushing too wide of the pocket--in the NFL he will get burned by this over and over.
Ideal position: 43 WOLB---where he can wreak havoc on the edge and not have to set or maintain the edge.
Can he be a productive and effective DE in the nickel (4 man rush)? No. He's too small.
Grade: 1st round
Bjoern Werner, 6-4, 275, Florida St.
2011: 37/11/7/0/1
2012: 42/18/13/0/1
FSU vs. NCSt. 2012 DEs Bjoern Werner & Tank Carradine vs. QB Mike Glennon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RRjhUdWa2Y
Werner---Plusses:
Maintains the edge well---
Physical at the point of attack
Good rush angle---not too wide
Crashes down the line well
Gets good pressure on QB
Can string plays out well
Good on TEX stunts (tackle/end exchange/loops)
Gets his hands up and a fair share of batted/deflected passes
Werner---Minuses
Poor three point stance
Sets up in his stance too late, too often
Doesn't get off the ball consistently well
More of a read and react type player---only he reacts too late too often
With game on line---looked gassed and did not step up
Grade: 2nd round
Carradine---Plusses
Good length and athleticism
Holds the edge fairly well
Shows good quickness and hand action
Carradine---Minuses
On the turf a lot
Gets cut blocked too easily
needs to use his hands much better
Plays off-balance---to much lean on his rush which cause him to slip
Grade: 4th round
Note: if you watched the entire video, you saw Mike Glennon's finest and biggest comeback win at NC State. You also might have been surprised to see Glennon buy some extra time with his feet, which typically has not been tagged as one of his strengths.
Ziggy Ansah, 6-5, 275, BYU
2011: 7/0/0/0/0
2012: 62/13/4.5/0/1
Ziggy Ansah in the Senior Bowl game:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3mGBlGYLsQ
Plusses:
Very physical at the point of attack
Disengages from blocks quickly
Has tremendous speed to chase down and finish plays
Very good bull rush
Maintains rush angle very well
Plays disciplined
Around the ball a lot
Diagnoses the plays quickly
Minuses:
Lacks pass rush moves---needs to develop swim, spin and rip techniques
Grade: 1st round. The upside here is enormous. Best blend of size, power and speed in the draft.
Upside for Cardinals: can play 34 SOLB and nickel DE.
Dion Jordan, 6-6, 249, Oregon
2011: 42/13/7.5/0/1
2012: 44/10.5/5/0/3
Dion Jordan vs. Stanford 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMoel8E3HaE
Plusses:
Supremely athletic
Good length
Outstanding chaser
Quick and speedy off the edge
Extremely versatile---can cover TEs in the slot
Good tackler
A little stronger than advertised
Minuses:
Gets fooled a fair amount---you could see how Stanford game planned against him on QB keepers, runs inside of him.
Pass rush angle is often too wide which hurts versus runs to his side and versus a scrambling QB
Undisciplined at times
Lacks requisite NFL edge strength
Grade: 1st round, picks 20-32. His versatility is so attractive---but his injury issues and his lack of production in college are question marks---only 12.5 sacks in the last 2 years.
Note: if you watched this tape how impressed you might have been with Stanford RB Stepfan Taylor---whose lack of combine wow factors are causing him to drop in the draft. Stepfan Taylor can get it done. He's a warrior.
Barkevious Mingo, 6-4, 240, LSU
2011: 46/15/8/0/1
2012: 38/8.5/4.5/0/1
Mingo vs. Clemson 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDqkUsRgw6s
Plusses:
Tremendously quick first step
Blazingly fast crashing, stunting and rushing to the inside
Quick and naturally athletic
Plays the angles well
Minuses:
Negates first step by stopping his feet
Plays tentatively---as if he's thinking too much
Doesn't break down well on runs to his side
Gets little push after hard contact, especially on pass rush
Grade: 1st round---he's too good an athlete to grade any lower. The problem is, he doesn't finish his rushes or many of his plays off, which is why his production number are alarmingly low for a player of his talent.
Fit for the Cardinals? Yes, sir. Here's why. He's such a good athlete on the edge that he could be a tremendous asset at 34 OLB. Like Dion Jordan, he can cover TEs. If he gets stronger and he will and a coach like Tom Pratt turns him into a relentless pass rusher, the sky is the limit. Plus, he can rush the passer as a nickel DE---so that versatility is very attractive.
Best choices for Cardinals:
1. Ziggy Ansah
2. Jarvis Jones
3T. Dion Jordan
3T. Barkevious Mingo
5. Bjoern Werner
Bruce Arians and Todd Bowles want the defense to be more physical, more imposing of their athletic will and more punishing in the way in which they attack the ball carriers and wide receivers.
There are some very intriguing edge rushers that will be scooped up early in this draft---let's see which ones might be the most appealing to the Cardinals:
Jarvis Jones, 6-2, 245, Georgia
2011: tackles: 70; tackles for loss: 17.5; sacks: 8.5; ints: 0. forced fumb: 2
2012: 85/24.5/14.5/1/7
Jones vs. Alabama 2012:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqczNIJJ2O4
This tape tells you pretty much all you need to know about Jarvis Jones:
Areas in which he excels:
Quick off the ball
Tenacious
Plays to the whistle
Doubles back to the ball on his pass rush in a flash
Tries to meet contact on blocks, shed and still make tackle---which he did on a pull block by Chance Warmack
Plays plenty fast on tape (forget recent 40 time)
Quickness and alertness are his forte
Areas in which he struggles:
Holding and maintaining the edge: see the Eddie Lacy TD---this is what NFL teams will do repeatedly---they will run to his side, straight at him
Rushing too wide of the pocket--in the NFL he will get burned by this over and over.
Ideal position: 43 WOLB---where he can wreak havoc on the edge and not have to set or maintain the edge.
Can he be a productive and effective DE in the nickel (4 man rush)? No. He's too small.
Grade: 1st round
Bjoern Werner, 6-4, 275, Florida St.
2011: 37/11/7/0/1
2012: 42/18/13/0/1
FSU vs. NCSt. 2012 DEs Bjoern Werner & Tank Carradine vs. QB Mike Glennon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RRjhUdWa2Y
Werner---Plusses:
Maintains the edge well---
Physical at the point of attack
Good rush angle---not too wide
Crashes down the line well
Gets good pressure on QB
Can string plays out well
Good on TEX stunts (tackle/end exchange/loops)
Gets his hands up and a fair share of batted/deflected passes
Werner---Minuses
Poor three point stance
Sets up in his stance too late, too often
Doesn't get off the ball consistently well
More of a read and react type player---only he reacts too late too often
With game on line---looked gassed and did not step up
Grade: 2nd round
Carradine---Plusses
Good length and athleticism
Holds the edge fairly well
Shows good quickness and hand action
Carradine---Minuses
On the turf a lot
Gets cut blocked too easily
needs to use his hands much better
Plays off-balance---to much lean on his rush which cause him to slip
Grade: 4th round
Note: if you watched the entire video, you saw Mike Glennon's finest and biggest comeback win at NC State. You also might have been surprised to see Glennon buy some extra time with his feet, which typically has not been tagged as one of his strengths.
Ziggy Ansah, 6-5, 275, BYU
2011: 7/0/0/0/0
2012: 62/13/4.5/0/1
Ziggy Ansah in the Senior Bowl game:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3mGBlGYLsQ
Plusses:
Very physical at the point of attack
Disengages from blocks quickly
Has tremendous speed to chase down and finish plays
Very good bull rush
Maintains rush angle very well
Plays disciplined
Around the ball a lot
Diagnoses the plays quickly
Minuses:
Lacks pass rush moves---needs to develop swim, spin and rip techniques
Grade: 1st round. The upside here is enormous. Best blend of size, power and speed in the draft.
Upside for Cardinals: can play 34 SOLB and nickel DE.
Dion Jordan, 6-6, 249, Oregon
2011: 42/13/7.5/0/1
2012: 44/10.5/5/0/3
Dion Jordan vs. Stanford 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMoel8E3HaE
Plusses:
Supremely athletic
Good length
Outstanding chaser
Quick and speedy off the edge
Extremely versatile---can cover TEs in the slot
Good tackler
A little stronger than advertised
Minuses:
Gets fooled a fair amount---you could see how Stanford game planned against him on QB keepers, runs inside of him.
Pass rush angle is often too wide which hurts versus runs to his side and versus a scrambling QB
Undisciplined at times
Lacks requisite NFL edge strength
Grade: 1st round, picks 20-32. His versatility is so attractive---but his injury issues and his lack of production in college are question marks---only 12.5 sacks in the last 2 years.
Note: if you watched this tape how impressed you might have been with Stanford RB Stepfan Taylor---whose lack of combine wow factors are causing him to drop in the draft. Stepfan Taylor can get it done. He's a warrior.
Barkevious Mingo, 6-4, 240, LSU
2011: 46/15/8/0/1
2012: 38/8.5/4.5/0/1
Mingo vs. Clemson 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDqkUsRgw6s
Plusses:
Tremendously quick first step
Blazingly fast crashing, stunting and rushing to the inside
Quick and naturally athletic
Plays the angles well
Minuses:
Negates first step by stopping his feet
Plays tentatively---as if he's thinking too much
Doesn't break down well on runs to his side
Gets little push after hard contact, especially on pass rush
Grade: 1st round---he's too good an athlete to grade any lower. The problem is, he doesn't finish his rushes or many of his plays off, which is why his production number are alarmingly low for a player of his talent.
Fit for the Cardinals? Yes, sir. Here's why. He's such a good athlete on the edge that he could be a tremendous asset at 34 OLB. Like Dion Jordan, he can cover TEs. If he gets stronger and he will and a coach like Tom Pratt turns him into a relentless pass rusher, the sky is the limit. Plus, he can rush the passer as a nickel DE---so that versatility is very attractive.
Best choices for Cardinals:
1. Ziggy Ansah
2. Jarvis Jones
3T. Dion Jordan
3T. Barkevious Mingo
5. Bjoern Werner