Falcons Begin to Clean House

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,492
Reaction score
41,047
Location
UK
There is a targeted and systematic approach like the Steelers use and the throw spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks approach we use. Both teams had WR needs. One team used a targeted approach and the other is still talking about upgrading their WR core.

The difference is we drafted WRs in years where it wasn't a strong area of the draft and didn't draft them when it was.

Heck we drafted 3 WR last year when this year's draft was known to be packed with offensive skill players.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,700
Reaction score
39,012
I don't disagree that drafting is hard and an inexact science, but I also know that consistently good teams draft a large number of their best players. The Pats don't hit on all of their picks, but they get contributions out of a lot of them, and a significant % of their best players are guys they drafted. Steelers are the same. Ravens are the same. Saints and Vikings. Chiefs and SF are more of where we are at but they also have hit on a ton of picks if you look at their starting lineups.

So, you accurate to say that we are not the worst. That said, we are also a team that has wasted a significant number of high draft picks and our record reflects that. Our three most successful recent draft picks are DJ Humphries and Budda Baker and Kyler Murray and people argue if two of them are actually good. We have too many Haason Reddicks and Robert Nkemdiches and Brandon Williams and Dorian Johnsons and Chad Williams and Hakeem Butlers for this team to be consistently good. Those players cost us cap dollars because we then have to sign vets to fill those roles. To consistently get little to no contribution from top 100 players is a sign of a bad process.

Example...

Since 2017 we have drafted 5 wide receivers

Chad Williams - 98
Christian Kirk - 47
Andy Isabella - 62
Hakeem Butler - 103
KeeSean Johnson - 174

Despite that we had to trade for our #1 WR. In that same period of time, Pittsburgh has drafted 4

JuJu Smith-Schuster - 62
James Washington - 60
Diontae Johnson - 66
Chase Claypool - 49

Just comparing those two groups, it is pretty clear that a traditionally better franchise does consistently better when allocating draft resources. Now you can argue that every team has position groups that it drafts better than others, but I don't know that we have one.

Long story short, we have to draft better if we are going to ever be a consistently good franchise.

Speaking of Claypool how in the hell did he last until the 2nd round. I saw a bit of that game against Cleveland I had tried to get him on my Fantasy team but someone else got the waiver. he's a beast. I had no idea how fast and smooth he was.

WR loaded draft so far he's the best rookie WR in the draft, admittedly has a better situation than most but my goodness, he's good after the catch, he can run the ball, and he's big and strong. He looks like what David Boston was before he got obsessed with bodybuilding and PED's
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,934
Posts
5,412,714
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top